PC 1961-1962-109~ ~. ~~ ~~; . # • .~ ;,,
` rr Y w ~k~+ ~
•~::::__. ~-~ - -
'~~~~~ ~
i~~~ .
:,i ~Y.. ~ '~ .:'-. ~,.~' ~
i~ ~~
('~::
RHSOLUTION N0. 109, SHRIHS 1_961-62
:~r,. -
_~:,'
A RHSOLUTION OP 1HH CITY PIANNING C~A4lISSI~1 OP T7~ffi CITY OF AI~AI~RI'ri
THAT PBTITION FOR VARIANCH N0. 1409 BH QtAI~1TED
1h'fi~tRAS, the City Planning Commission of ~he City of Anahe3m did receive a verified
Petition for Variance from KBNNBTH W. BRADY, 203 South Monument Street, Anaheim, California,
Owner
of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, Caunty of Orange, State of
California, as described in Sxhibit "A" or as follows: Lot 44, Tract No. 1940, and further
described as 203 South Monumen~ Street.
; and
Wf~RBAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in
the City of Anaheim on October 16, 1~61, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said
public hearing havine been duly given as required by]aw and in accordance with the provi-
sions of the Aaaheim Municipal Code, Chaptes 18.68, to hear and consider evi8ence for and
agaiast said proposed variance and to investigate and mate findings and recommendations
in connection thQrewith; and
WF~RBAS, said Commission, after due inspection, iavestigatioa,and studq mada by it-~
self and in its behalf, and after due consideration of ali evidence and reports offered
as ssid hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner sequests a variance• from the Anaheim Nunicipal Code:
9ection 18.24.030 (1) to permit an encroachment of fifteen (15) feet into the
required twer_ty-five (25) foot front yard of sub,ject property in order to
construct a six (6) foot fence.
2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary ci~cumstances or conditions
applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not
apply generally to the property or class of use in the aame vicinitq and zone.
3. That 4he requested variance is necessary for the ~reservation and enjoyment
of a eubstantial property right possessad by other property in the same vicinity and
zone, and denieri to the property in question. •
4. That the =equested variance wili not be materially detrimental to the public
welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zane in wh3.ch
the property is located,
5. That the requested variance wiil not adversely affect the Comprehensive
Geueral Plan.
6. That the existing fence was recently constructed in violation of
the Anaheim Municipal Code on an interim basis and that the petitioner
has agreed to the necessity of its replacement with a six (6) foot masonry
wall where said fence presently encroaches into tne required twenty-five
(25) foot front yard.
7. That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition.
V-1 °1'
_...~-----~---- ___. __...... ... -- ---- ___ ....._ _ _ . ____. _ _ .__. _..------- ,: :~
:; ;;~.. _ .....,-.. _.
~ ..:,_. _-
- -~:a7 • ~. .
1
:.~1 ~ '
1,
~ , ~ I ~ ~~..~ ~~~ ' ~
4
V ':.
' _
j~
f ~
t : c t ~ , ':
~ NaMi THSREPORB BH IT RESOLVSD that the Anaheim Cit Planai Commiasion hereb
i^~;: r r Y n8 Y
approvea Variance No. 14os , upon the folloxing coadit3oas rrhich
F'-' are hereby fciund to be a neceaserq prerequiaite to the propoaed use of the aub,~ect prc-
perty ia order to pieaerve the eafety and geaeral xelfare of 4he CiLizeas of Anaheim: ~~
;`-j 1. Dev>lopment substantially in accordance with Exhibit No. 1 with the
?t=' stipulation that a six (6).foot masonry wall shall be constructed on
,,;;~ the present fence location in the required twenty-five (25) foot front
-;~ yard area, ~
~~~~ 2, preparation of improvement plans and the removal of the existing driveway
apron and installation of curbing and also the installation of a new
driveway apron for direct access to the existing garage, in accordance
with the approved standard plans on file inthe Office of the City Engineer.
3. Installation of landscaning in the ten (10) foot front yard setback prior +.
to Final $uilding Inspection of the wall.
4. Time lAmitation of 180 days for the accomplishment of Item Nos. 1 and 2.
!~
S,
:,~
~I ~
;.~ TfiB PQtFGOING RHSOLUTIQt~i ie eigaed and approved by ae this 16th day of October, 1961 .
~/i
+ . C ~' ~/ ~/`~i;/~/~
'. . CHAIRMAN ANA}IDIM CITY PLANNING COAV~lI93102I
, ATl&9T: ~ ~;
~ ~ ~
S ' \~
~ ~ ( c./
~~ ANAfffiIM CITY YI.AI~IIi C(~4dISSI~I
i
~i ~ 8"' OP CALIPORNi:A )
;.~ COiJNTY OP ORANGB ) sa.
CITY OP ANAF~IM ) i
::1
~;,} I. JEAN PAGE ~ 5ecretary of the City Planaiag Coma:lea£on of the City of i
~' ' Anaheim, 3o hereby certify thet the foregoing resoiution raas paased and edopted at a ~
;::i i neetiag of the City Planaing Comaisaion of the C~itp of Ana2aeirt~ held on October 16, 1961, !
'~ at 2;00 o'clock P.M.~ by the following vote af the aesbers thereof:
.;;~1 ~ AYES: CUG@~lI831Q~iSRB: yllred, Gauer, Hapgood, Marcoux, Mungall, Pe'bley; 'i
!;j 4 NOB3: CahAfIS3I0NBR3: Tjoneers .
i i ` ABSENT: OUI~iI9SI~Iffil3 : Mo r r i s, P e r r y
'~ t
.
~ ; IN WITNB$$ WHBRHOP, I bave heYeunto set mq hRad this 16th day of October, 1961.
,, ~ %.
;.~ ' ~
~:l
..j SB ANA~IRIA! CITY P COFaQI3SI0~1
r,i~~
VCTrW _2~
-- RESOLUTIOiv N0. 1~9
,,
-•.
,,,.~, .~_.~.__~...,, _ __._. . _ ...
~ ,~
-- ,:' , -+ .
. 5~~ i ~ . r~ .