PC 1961-1962-53. .. ~ i
. . . .f
~~_. : ~' '~.
+i
~.~
~
t w . ~~
d '
z
, ~ ~.,~,n
:~
RBSOLUTION N0. 53. SHRIHS 1961-62
~~'~ A RHSOLUTI~i OP T!~ CYTY PIANNYNG C~D(ISSI0~1 OP T~ CITY OP A~WWIDIN
v~' RBC~iATNG TO Tf~ CITY CtKJI1CII. OP ~ CITY OP ANA}~3IN THAT , .
}" pBTITION PQR RBCYA38IPICATION Nd 61-~i2-14 BS APPROVHD
~ ~ ~~,1
~' k'FI~tBA3, the Ci4y Pianain Cosmieaioa of the Ci# of Ana~heia did receive a perif3ed
t~'.' 8 Y
~;; Petitioa foi Recla~aification fron ROBERT L. WRTZLBR, 929 Spring Street, Anaheim, Caiifornia,
3.: Otimer, Stephen F. Gallagher, California Bank Building, Anaheitn, California, Agent; proposing
~: reclassification of the following described property; Hxhibit "A" on file in the office of
~' the Planning Department.
i ~
MF~lRBA$, the City Piaaning Co~isaion did hoid a publ3c hearing at the City Hall ia
the City of Anaheim on August 21, 19G1 at 2:00 o`cloc~ P.M., soti~e of said
public hearing haviag beea duly givea as required bylaM and ia accordaace xith the provi-
siona of the Anaheim Municipai Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear aad conaider evidence fcr and
against said propoae~.3 reclasaificatioa and fo inveatigate and aal:e f3ndiags sad reco~nen-
dationa in connection thereaith; and
@VHHRBA3, said Commiasion, afte= due inspection,iavestiga~ioxt, aad atudq made bq it-
seif and in its behaif~ and after due consideration of ail evideace aad reporta offered
at said hearing, does find and determine the foilovring facts:
1, That the petitioner propoaea a reclasaificatioa~ of the.above deacribed pro- ~ i
perty from tIIe R-A, RHSIDBNTIAL AGRICULTURAL; ZONB to the C-3, HBAVY COMMBRCIAL, ZONB l~imited
to se vice station use only for the. northerly 150 feet and to the C-1, NHIGHBORHOOD COMNIBRCIAL,;
ZOtIS ~fqLr t}~a~out~l~e l~iropoeee~t=eciaeaificatioa of aub,~ect propertq ~_ aesesaar~ or
deairable for 4he orderly aad proper developmeat of the couunity.
3, Tlxat 4he proposed reciasaificatioa of aub,~ect property doea properly
relate to the zoaea and their permitted uaea locaiiq estabiiahed in close prosiait~ to
eub,~ect property aad to the zoaes and their pesmitted usea geaerally esLabliahed through-
out the co~nunity.
4. That the p=oposed reciassification of aub,~ec4 property doea require
dedication for aad standard improveeent b~' abutting etreeta becdqat saia proper~q
does relate to and abut upon atreets and highuaps xrhich are ~~ to cazry.the
tqpe and quantity of traffic~ ~ahich uili be generated by the per~sit e~ d ueed, in ~accord-
ance with the circula4ion element of the Generai Plaa.
5. That no one anpeared in opposition to suoject petiL•ion.
R-1
. _...__ __...s;: ,~ -
. , ..... ~-`1 ~
-1-
-.--- _ ~._.___ _ _ _- ---
~ . .
~ .___._...._...~,.,.
,_.=~,_r ....:.~.,..~._ ...~...r._~.~..~~:.y..».~r...~,~.,:..~,..r.~.,.
~m-..,~.,.~„~. .~~..~.,~.~..~w,.....~_..~.....~,.._~_...~._._._... ~.---__ __ _ _ _ ~
i
, ~
~ ;j . . .
. 1~
~ ~~
NU+V, 1HBRHPORH, BB IT RHSOLVHD that the Anaheim City Planning Commission hereby ,
recommends to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that Pe•~~tion for Reclassification
No, 61-62-i4 be approved and, by so doing, that T_r.t~-r 18-~'Laning of the Anaheim
Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above describeL~ pr.~per•cy f~am the R-A, RBSIDBNTIAL
AGRICULTiAtAL, zone and to incoroorate said described prope.fy i.it t:ia-~ C-3, HHAVY COVdtdHRCIAL !
ZONB limited to service station use only for the northexlp 150,~eQ". r_nd to the Glt NHIGHBO~t- j
HOOD COMMHttCIAL, ZONE for t1~e southerly 125 feet, upan thP fol,cwiy;; conditions which are here-
by found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of *he sebject property in order
to preserae the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of Anaheim: !
i
1. Development substantially in accordance with Hxhibit Nos. 1 and 2 with the submission of j
the C-1, Neighborhoo~ Commercial, development plans, and the plot plans for the proposed !
service station to the Planning and Buiiding Departments for reeiew. ~
2. Recordation of deed restrictions limiting u'se of the r~ortherly 152 feet of subjec't propert};
to the C-3, Heavy Commercial, Zone for a service station only or to any C-1 Neighborhood ~
Commercial, Zone use, ~
3. Dedication of 53 feet from the monumented centerline of Bali Road (50 feet existing). ~
4. Preparation of street improvea~ent plans aiid installation of all improvements for Ball ~
Road in accordance with the approved stattde~rd•p!~ ott file in the office of the City Bngineei~
5. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Ball Road. i
6. Time limitation of ninety (90) days for the accomplishment of Item Nos. 3,,4, and 5. ~
~ ~
t
i
a
1
THB PORBGOING RB90LUTION is siQned and approved by me this 21st day of August, 1961. '
ATTBST:
Ovi~
S ARX ANAFIBIM TY P ~YNG CQ~A1I$SIO'N -~
ATE OP CALIPORNIA )
COtJNTY OP ORANGS ) ss.
CITY OP ANAI~IM )
I~ Jean Page , Secretary of the City Plaaning Commission of the Citq of
Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foxegoing reaolutiori was passed and adapted at a
meeting of the City Plarming Commission of the City of Anaheim, heid on August 21, 1961
at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the followiag vote of the members theseof:
AYBS: CObAtISSIONffitS: Allred, Gaues, Hapgood, Marcoux, Muagall, Pebley, Summers.
NQSS: C~AlI3SIOI~iBR3: None.
ABSBNT: C(Y~ASI3SIOI~3: Morris, Perr~,
IN WITNES3 YlHSRBOP, I have hersuntc. set my hand this 21s# day of August; 1961.
~~ ~
SE Y ANAHSIb+ CITY PIANN~3~~~C ~x33I0N
R 2-•A
,~ ?esolution No. 53
'~ . - ...-... ~~ ~~.
-2_-
~- -----_.___.~_------•---~----___...__ ~.---~~___ . , ~
. - __ __ _
~ - . . .. . . - -- _ ~ 1