PC 1961-1962-56~ k:• -• ~ ~ ~':~Ri-
RBSpLUTION NO 56. SHRIHS 1961-62
i
A RBSOLUTIOd~i OF THH CIT3t FIANNING CObOdISSI~I OP 17iB CITY OF ANAI~ED(
RBC~~iDING TO TH8 CYTY CO[TN~IL OP TFffi CITY QF ANAI~IM TAAT
PHTITTON PO~t RHCIA33IPICATION PIO: 61-62-18 SE APPROVSD
4V~tBA3, the Cihy pluaning Commisaion of the City of Anahei*~ did receive a yerified
Petition for Reclasaification from WILLIAM D. RHMY, 1545 West Katella Avenue, Anaheim,
California, Cwmer, J. R. Nason, 616 West Common~cealth Avenue, Pullerton, California, Agent,
proposing reclassification of thP following desr_ribed property; Lot 106 of Tract No. 2903,
as shown on a Map recorded in Book 99, pages ?.1, 22 and 23 of Miscellaneous Maps, records
of Orange County, California. .
i ~
WFIDRBAB, the City Pianniag Coaisaion did hold a public hear3ng mt the C3t~ ~li in
the City of Anaheim on August 21, 1961 at 2:00 o~cioct P.11.~ aotice of eaid
pubiic hearing haviag beea duly givea aa required by Y±~ and ia accordaace rith the provi-
sions of the Aaaheim Municipal Code, Chapter. 18.72, to hear and consider evideace for aad
against said propoaed reclasaificatioa aad to iavest?gate and nate fiadiaga and recoam~ea-
dations'ia connectioa therexith; and
Wt~tHAS, said Commiasion, after due inepectiAn~iaveatigatioa, aad study aade by it-
seif and in ite behaif, aad after due considera4ion of a11 E~idence amd reporta offered
at said hearing, doea find aad determiae the foilowing facts:
1. That the petitioner propoaea a reciasaification of the above deacribed pro-
perty from t3ne R-1, ONH PAMILY RBSIDHNTIAL, ZONH to the C-1, NHIGHHORHOOD COt~fERCIAL, ZONH
' 2. That the propoaed reciaesificatioa of sub,~ect property ~_, neceaaar~ or
deairable for the orderly and proper development of the co~unity.
3. lhat the propoaed recisesification of aub3ect propesty doea properiy
relate ta the zones aa~d their permitted uaes localiy eatabliahed in close proxinit~ to
subiect property aad to the zonea and their permitted uues gemcraliy eatabiiahed through-
out the co~nunity.
4. That the proposed :eciasaificatioa of aub~ect property doea not requ~re
dedicstion for and etnadard inprove~eat of xbutting streeta becauae said plopwrtg+
does relate to and abut upon atreets and highaaye rrhich are imoroved to carr~ ~2ae
typF and quantity of tra!~fic~ which xiii be generated hy the per~titted ueea, in •aecord-
anee with the ~irculation element of the Geusral Pian.
5. That no one appeared in oppositicn to subject petition.
g_1 -J.- ,
i ;
,
,
~,'. __ .---~~-------___---~------------ -----_. __--- ------------ ~
- -~~ ~ , '~ _._,:~__ _. __ ....__- ~ _ __-- - ~
:._.~ . - .._..' . p ' . . .
i.
;
:.,
; :~: ~` o
,
+~J
~.~~
NCki, 7HBRBFORH, BB IT RHSOLVBD that the Anaheim City Planning Commiss:au hereby
recommends to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that Petition for Recl::asification
No. 61~-62-18 be approved and, by so doing, that Title 18-Zoning e.` the Anaheim
Municipai Code be amended to exclude the above described property from th<• 3'-7., ONS FAMILY
RHSIDBNTIR.L zone and to incorporate said described prpperty in the G1 '~{IGHBORHOOD
C0~41ffitCIAL zone, upon the following conditions which are hereby found ~, be a neces-
sary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject psoperty in order to preserve the
safety and general welfare of the Citizens of Anaheim:
1. Development substantially in accozdance with Ilxhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
2. Limitation to one (1) unlight~d sign 4 feet in widtli and 6.3 feet in height in accordance
with the sign plan shown on Exhibit No, 2, said siga to be located at the alternate
sign location shown on Bxhiba.t No. 1.
3. Substantiai maintenance of existing residential character of the front portion of subject
property with the exception that sidewalks be isistalled on Katella Avenue in accordance
with Condition No. 4.
4, lnstallation of sidewalks on %atella Avenue <in accordance with approved standard
plaas on file in the office of the City Hngineer).
5. Recordation of C-1, Neighborhood Commercial, Zone deed zestrictions limiting use of
~ubjec# psoperty to business and professional offices only.
6. P.covision of a six l6) foot masonry wall siong the north boundary of subject property
to conform with existing wall color.
7. Time limitation of ninety (90) days for the accomplishment of Item Nos. 4, 5, and 6.
THB PORHGOING RH90LUTION is signed and ap~roved by me this 21st day of August, 1961,
ATTA3T:
SH 1 R IM TY P ING COAN! 33ION
OP CALIPORNIA )
COUNTY OP ORANGB ) ss.
CITY OP ANAHHIM )
I, Jean page , Secretary of the City Planning Co~niasion of the City of
Anaheim, do he=eby certify that the forego:ng reaolution was passed and adopted at a
~aeeting of the City Plasmiag Commisaion of the City of Anaheim, held on August 21, 1961
at 2:00 o`cloc~s P.M., by the fullowing vote of the members thereof:
A'~3S: COhAtISSIONBRS: Allred, Gauer, Hapgood, Marcoux, Mungall, Pebley, Summers.
NOB~: CONASISSIONffitS: None.
A: ~BI~T: f.~O~Q~fISSI0NHR3: Morris, Perry.
IN WITr%.°S3 WHBRBOP, I have hereunto set my hand this 21st day of August, 1961.
SE IM I7.Y ING COA4~SI98I
R2-A -2--
Resol~tion No. 56
~o.~,~~~ ~~.-
CHAIRMA.N 71NAHHIM CITY PIANNING COP9~4ISSIQ~ '
~
____~__._~~ -- ____.^ __ ____.._-..»-- -~-----• --------__._.-•._ .,.._ . -.-:..:...
_--rr;~ , L _