PC 1961-1962-92....._._..._ ..., ._, ..:._ ..: . .: ,._. ..:.~. ,..~.... _.,,. _ .... . . .._..._.. _.._. _
~
~
~ '' ~ ~~ -~ '-~
RASOLUTION NO 92. SHRIBS 1961-62 '
A RBSOLUTIC@i OP Tf~ CITY PIANHIPi~ C~Qr[ISSIdD1 OP T!~ CITY 03+ ANAHBII[
RBCCY~Ud~1DING TO Tf~ GITY COUNCIL OP Tf{G1C6TY 0~ANAHBII(~ T
PETITION POR RBCLA38IPICA130N N10.
t~tBA3, the City Pianning Com~iasioa af the City of Anaheim did rxcei~pe s oerified
Petition for Reclasaificatioa from C. W. HHSTHR, F. C. HARRINGTON and C. G. WARD, F. 0.
Box 215, 3800 Bast Coast Highway, Corona del Mar, California,.Owners; Joseph M. Girard,
Suite 610, 6505 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles 48, California, Agent; proposing re-
classification of the following desczibed property: Legal description, Bxhibit "A", on
' file in the office of the Planning Department
; 8nd
WHBRBAS, the City Plaaniag Comaission did hold a public fteering at thc 8it~ Hall in
the City of Anaheim on September 18, 1961 at 2:00 o~cloc~ P.M„ notice of anid
public hearing having beea duly given as xequired.by]a~e and in accor8aace xith the provi-
eions of the Anaheim blunicipal Code, Ckiapter 18.72, to hear aad corasider e9idence for and.
against said propoaed reclassificatioa aad to iavestigafie and aake findings aad recosaea-
dations in conaection therewith; a~d
WtiSRBA3~ said ~omm3eaion, after due iaepection,iavestigation, aad eludq vade by it-
aeif and in its behalf, und.after due coasideration of ail evidence, aad reporta offered
at said hearing, doea find and determiae the foilowing facts:
1. T1xat the petit3oner proposeo a reclasaificatioa of tlae above deacribed pro-
pesty from tIIe R-A, RHSIDHNTIAL AGRICULTURAL, ZONB to the C-1, NBIGHBORHOOD COMI~!ffitCIAL,
ZONH.
2, Th:~:: the propoaed reclasaification of sub3ect property ~_ neceaear~ or
desirable for the orderiy and prop~r developmeat of the coeesuaity.
3. That the propo~ed rec?lasaification of aubJact property doea progerly
relate 4o the zonea and their peronitted uses locaily establiahed in close proxiaitT to
aub3ect property aad to the zonea ~sad fiheir permitted uaes generaliy e8tabiiahed through-
out the community.
4. That the proposed recissaificatioa of sub3ect property does not require
dedicatios for and atandard inprovemeat of abutting atreeta becauae 8aid proptrty
doea relate to and abut upon atsee4a and highways which are imoroved to carry t2ue
type sad quantity o€ treffie~ xhich will be geaeratea by the pezaitted ueea~ in •occord-
ance with the circulatioa elemeat of thx Generai Plan.
5. That no one appeared in opposition to the C-1, Neighborhood Commercial, Zone
classification for subject property, although verbal opposition was recorded against the
proposed two story height of the proposed commercial development.
R-1
-1-
- ----- ---.. __---- „
~ _.._
° i ~ j,
C.~ ~ ~~ :~ ~ ~ ;:~
f..
~:'-
,3
~ ~ ~~ f ~ ;~
.1
NOH1, THBRHPORB, BH IT RSSOLVBU that the Anaheim City Planning Commission hereby
recommends to the City Council of the City of Attaheim that Petition for Reclassification
No. 61-62-23 be approved and, by so doing, that Title 18-2oning of the Anaheim
Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above described property from the R-A,Residential
Agricultural zone and to incorporate said described property in the C-1,Neighborhood
Commercial . zone, upon the following conditions~which are hereby found to be a neces-
sary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the
safety and general welfare of the Citiaens oY Anaheim:
1. Development substantially in accordance with Hxhibit Nos. 1 2, and 3, with the stipula-
tion that no buildings be placed within 120 feet of the nor~herly pro~erty line~ and with
the exception that those areas proposed for ingre'ss and egress be modified, limiting
the access from Monterey.Street to the center access area only, as indicated on Bxhibit
No. 1, and with the provision of landscaping in accordance with the requirements stipu-
lated in Condition No. 2, Plans ~or 3aid development to be submitted to and subject to
the approval of the Ruilding and planning Departments.
2, ~rovision of a minimum six S6),foot strip of landscaping,along Monterey Street,and Lin-
coln Avenue with the installatioa of tree wells, eitrier in this landscaped strip or in
the parkway portion of the lanned highway right-of-w~y line of Lincoln Avenue and Mon-
terey Street, placed at for~y (40) foot intervals,.plans for said landscaping to be sub-
mitted to and sub,7ect to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Mas.ntenance and
to be installed prior to Final Building Inspection.
3, Installation of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the northerly property line where sub-
,ject property abuts the R-1, One Family Residential, 2one prior to Pinal Building In-
spection.
4. Provision of parking in accordance with Code requirements and in accordance with the
open-air parking space standards on file in the office of the planning Department.
5. Payment of $2,00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Lincoln Avenue.
6. Installation of sidewalks in accordance with the approved standard plans on file in the
Office of the City Hngineer.
7, Installation of standard commercial driveways in accordance with the approved standard
plans on file in the Office of the City 8ngineer.
8, Provision of utility easements along exterior boundaries as determined to be necessary
b the Director of Public Utilities to adequately serve the subject property and other
p~operty. .
9, Time limitation of ninety (90) days for the' accomplishment of Item Nos. 5, 6, 7 and 8.
THH FORBGOING RBSOLUTION is signed and approved Uy me this 18th day of September, 1961.
CHAI ANAHHIM CIT3f PIANNI COFQfI
ATTEST:
~
SB ARY ANAHBIM CITY ING CQhQfI3SI0N
ST TE OP CALIPORNIA
COUNTY OP ORANGg ) ss.
CITY OP APIA}~IM )
I~ J~ PAG$ , Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the Citq of
Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed aad adopted at a
meeting of the City Pla:ming Commisaion of the City of Anaheim, held on September 18, 1961
at 2:00 o'clock P.M.. by the following vate of the members thereof:
AYH3: COhAtI8SI0NERS:Allred, Gauer, Hapgood, Marcoux, Mungall, Pebley, Perry,3ummers.
NOB3: CQ~AlI33IONBRB; None.
ABSHNT: C0~9~(I9SIOI~tB: Morris,
IN WITNB39 WFffiFtSOP, I have hereunto set my hand this 18th day of September, 1961.
&H ANAHBIM CITY ING CGiNAfI39I0N
R 2-A
RESOLUTION N0. 92
-2--
- i~: