Loading...
PC 1961-1962-191,f `' , I t - b 9V ~ ~ , ~~ ~, i-"-~- --+-- I ~ - ,~`~' ,.~r ~ ; • ,.~._.,........._.._ -----...__.. ...,..:._...,, ,~:,...,~.:.~..«._....._,-._ ,..~..._:. __....._....:....__.._~.,.._......,. :'~ ~, ,.._.,,, ....................... ... _.. _....~....... ,.....,,.._.._....,... . . ... ~. ' ~~~` ~y~ ti . ~ ' • RESOLUTION NO. 191, SHRTHS 1961-d2 ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMtSSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY CO'(JNCIL OF THE C1TY OF ANAHEIM THAT • ~ PETITION FOR RECT.ASSIFICATION NO. 61-6?-53 gE APPROVED ~ . . ~ ~ . . . . .. ~ ~ i WHEREAS, the City Flanning Commiasion of the City of Aneheim did receive e verified Petition for Reclas'sifica- . tionfrom H. H. RRU&GBR, P. 0. Box 202, Anaheim, Cali£ornia, Owner; Hetty Roberts and Oscar ; Schultz, 723 North Los Angeles Street, Anahe3m, Ca1i€ornia, Agent; proposing reclassification ~ of the following described property: All that certain,land situated in the State of Califor- ; nia,, County of Orange, described as follow's: That postion~ef th:: westerly 6 acres of the ; easterly one-half of the northerly one-half c+f Lot 8 of Anaheim Hxtension, as shown on.a Map ti of Survey made by William Hamel on file in the office of tlie County Recorder of Los Angeles County, Califosnia, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of said westerly ; 6 acres and running thence easterly along the northerly iine of said westerly 6 acres, 150 'feet; thence southerly parallel with the westerly line of said westerly 6 acres,.800.25 feet ~ to the southerly line'of said westerly 6 acres; thence westerly along said southerly line, y; 150 feet to the southwest corne$oo~fZSafeete*•oethe point o~' beginningr~EXrCSPTING TI~RHPROMtthe ' line of said westerly 6 acres, g follqwin~hancernorthl74~~37Be~5"~eastaalong thetnorth lineeof~saidlwesteilyl~ acrese150nfeet; running thence south 15~ 20' 30" east and parallel with the westerly line of said westerly 6 acres, 345 feet; thence south ?~1~ 37' 25" west and parallel with said no~thezly line 150 feet to said westerly line; thence north 15~ 20',30" west along said westerly line 345 feet to the point of beginning;,and WIiEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public headng at the City Hell in the City of Aneheim oa Januacy 8, 1962 at 2:00 o'clack P.M. notice of said public headng having been duly given es cequiced•by law and in acco~denc~ with the provisions of the Aneheim M¢nicipal Code, Chepter 18.72, to hear end consider evidence for and ageinat seid pioposed reclassificetion end to investigete and meke findings and tecommendetions in connection theccwith; end ~ WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, end study made by itself and in its behalf, and eftec due cottside:ation of ell evidence and repocts ofEeced at said hearing, does find end determine the following.facts: 1. That the petitionec pmposes a reclassification of the above described property from Uie R-1, ONE PAMILY RHSIDBNTIAL, and the iT-2, TWO PAMILY RBSIDBNTIAL, ZONBS to the R-3, MUI;TIPLB FAMILY RBSIDBN- TIAL, ZONS. • . 2. Thet the proposed reclessificetion oE subject property is necessery end/or desirable for the orderly and pro- per development of the commwlity. 3. That the propos4d ceclassification of subject p:opeety does properly ~elate to the zones end'their permitted uses locelly established in close proximity to subject property and fo the zones und their permitted uses generelly estab- lished throughout the community. 4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does require dedication for and standard i:nprovement of abutting street~ because said property does relate to and abut upon streets aad highways which ate proposed to carry the type and,quantity oi traffic, which will be generated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation element of the General Plan. ' , 5. That verbal opposition by three owners of property in subject area, in addition to a petition•of protest containing 74 signatures, was recorded against subject petition: Verbal support was recorded by ane owner of property in subject area. ~ Rl-A ; . ._'~_"""~ _ _T _ _._ ~ --- Kr~-;~ -1- . ~ i i -_.._ -- ----_ ..~ _. _... --- -. .._.. ~x -- ~ . . ._ ._ .. ----__.___....---._.__...~_.._~_---- , ,,,~ 1 ~v.~ s ~,~) ~ ? ; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Plenning Commission does hereby cecommend 5 to the City Council of the City of Aneheim that subject Petition foc Reclassificetion be approved and, by so oing, i that Title 1&Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above described properry from the 1. Aevelopment substantialiy in accordance with B:chibit Nos. 1 and 2 with any s~bstantial ', revision of development plans to be subject to seview by the Planning Commission, and to be;; set for Public Hearing, and referral to the City Council. 'f 2. Payment of $2.00 per fsont foot fox s~reet ligHting purposes on Broadway. 3. Installation of sidewalks and driveways on Broadwa'y in accordance with the adopted standard plans or. file in the Office of the City Bngineer. ; 4. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be collected as i part of the Building Permit. ' 5, provision of trash storage axeas as determined by the Department of Public Works, ~ Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, accessible to trash-tsuck pick-up and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall, prior to Final Building Inspection, 6. Installation of s- six (6) foot masonry wall along the ~ivesterly boundary of subject ; property p.rior to Pinal Building Inspection. _' 7. Dedication of access ~ights to the stub end of Oak Stzeet and Chestnut Street and the :. alley connecting said streets. 1 8, Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Item Nos. 2, 3, and '7, THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end approved by me this 8th day of Januasy, 1962 i ~ }- , CHAIRMAN At~AHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIO r :3 ATTEST: ` ~ ', i SEC ARY ANAHEIM CITY P NNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ~ COUNTY CF OR~INGE ) ss. >; CITY OF ANAHEIM ) `' i 1 I, Jean Page, Secretary of the Ciry Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do heceby certify thet the fo:e- _ going cesolutioa wes pessed and adopted at a meeting of th~ City Plenning Commissian of the City of Anaheim, held on Janriary 8, 1962 at 2:OU o'clock P.M., by the following vote af the membecs thereof: AYES: COMMISSI0IVERS: Allred, Gauer, Hapgood, Mungall, Pebley, Perry, 5ummers, ~ NOES: COMMISSIQNERS: Marcoux. ; ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None. ~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 8th day of January, 1962. 1Y~ ~j RESOLU'PION N0. 191 ~ R2-A I _ - e:+: __ _~.-. . . ... .. ~ . .. .. ... , :.Yi'{ . ~ 3EC ARY ANAHEIM CITY P NNING COMMISSION -2- _ _ _ ----- ___._ -- , . a ~. _ .. - . . - --....... . c`~ i,~.) City Hall Anaheim, California January 22, 1962 REGULAR MEETING OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION.,. REGULAR MEETING - A Regular Meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman Gauer at 2:00 0'Clock P.M., a quorum being present. PRESENT - CHAIRMHN: Gauer; COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Hapgood, Marcoux, Mungall, ~ Pebley, and Perry. ABSENT - COMMISSIONERS: Summers. PRESENT - Senior Planner - Martin Kreidt Assistant City Attorney- Joe Geisler Secretary Pro Tem - Shirley Taylor INVOCATION ~ - Rev erend James C. Dixon, Pastor, Centrai Church of Christ, gave the Invocation. PLEDGE OF - Commissioner Marcoux led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ALLE~IANCE APPROVAL OF - The minutes of December 27, 1961, were approved as submitted. MINUTES The minutes of January 8, 1962, were approved as submitted with the following correction on page 641: Reclassification No. 6l-62-53: Condition No. 7-"Dedication of access rights ta the stub end of Oak Street and Chestnut Street and the alley connecting said streets in order to prohibit access to Oak and Ches n~ t r s and'th atlPv connecting said streets." RECLASSIFICATION - CONTINUED PUBLlC HEARING. Petition submitted by WILLIAM T. and LEONA N0. 61-62-5g GREGER, 605 Pandora Street, Anaheim, California, Owners; Vandruff Developments, Inc., 2973 West Rome Avenue, Anaheim, California, Agent; requesting that property described as: A parcel 533 feet by 640 feet with a frontage of 533 feet located on the west side of Sunkist Street between Lincoln Avenue and South Street; its northeast corner being approximately 255 feet more or less south of the southwest corr~ar of Lincoln Avenue and Sunkist Street, be reclassified from the R-A, RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL, ZONE to the R-3, MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, ZONE. Subject petition was filed in conjunction with Petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 189 and has been continued from the Meeting of January 8, 1962, at the request of the petition~r's agent in order that revised plans for a more suitable development of the subject property could be submitted. Mr. Norman Smettegard, Attorney for Vandruff Homes, appeared before the Commission and stated that the abutting property to the north of subject property h'ad recently sold for over $35,000 per acre, and,therefore, that said property can only be developed economically for apartments or commercial establishments. If subject property is not developed under the proposed plan at this time, with single story high quality multiple units, the land wili continue to increase in value andin the future a request for development would economicaliy haveto be mac~fortwo-story apartments or a commercial development. Mr. Smettegard noted that to the south of subject property is the Reynolds property, used for a grain mill and the storage of heavy equipment.. Traffic would not be increased to a great extent es it would for two-story or commercial development. Due to the growth of the City, he felt that the proposed apartments would fulfill a need and be an asset to the Community. Mr. Vandruff,.the developer, stated that their plans include beauti- ful landscaping, such as Monterey Pines along Sunkist Street. 663 - ... ~.... ,_ , . . _ .............<. • - _ ,. _.._ :s . ,, . -. . - : , . _ ._ --.. ~~._~ _ ... . . . . :~ . _ ;, f '~ ~ i Am/~ ~ .~' ~ ~+', ~,y !I ::i ~ ~ ~, ~_~ . { _ ~ ; d _~ ~; RESOLUTION N0. 191 SERIES 1961-62 C~tRHCTBD COPY: See Planni.ng Com- mission Msnutes of • aRUar 22 1962 , i A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61.62-53 gE APPROVED _ . • 1 WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Reclassifica- ; tio fo H Eo KR~ GER P. Oa Box 202 Anahei, Calif rni , Owner• Betty Rpberts and p&~ar ' Scfiu~~z 323 North Lo§ An eles Stree~, Anahe~m, Cali~orn~a Agen~• propos ng reclassification j of the ~ollowing describe~ property : All that certain land situa~etl in t~ie State of Calif.ornia ,County of Orange, described as follows: That portion of the westerly 6 acres of the easterly ;~ on h lf 0p the ortherl e-half ~f t 8 o A ah~im gxt nsio as s},own on Ma of Surve ma ~~y William ~~mel onYf~Ye xn the o~'~ipe o~ t~ie ,.ounty ~ecor~~r of I:os Ange`~e ~oun y,. Y' Ca~iforn}.a, ~l~scribed s~Y11 ss Beginni t~~ie no thwg~t corne~yof acrd we ~srfy ~.acres a runnin t nce ea e a ona the nort~i~r ane o~ sai we te 6 ~] e~ t fience sou t her ly para~ l~e~ l wi t t fie wes ter l y l~~ ie o f sa i d wes ter~ l y ~ b acres, ~~ bo 2 5 fee~ ~o ( ~h southerl~ line ~~ said westerl~ 6~cres; th~nce~ westerl~ along said southgri line, • 5~ feet to he sout west corner o saad wester y acres; hence northerly a on the. westerl line of said westerly 6 acres, 800e25 feet to the point of beginning ~XCEPTING '~ TIiEREFR~M the following described landz Be~inning at the northwest oorner of~said westerly 6 acres and running thence north 74° 37' 25 east along the north line of safd westerly 6 acr s 50 feet• th e so th 15° 20' 3p" ~t d arall 1 w'th th w'ste 1y li e of ai ~es~e~~~ ~ acr~s, ~3~~ fee~; ~henqe south 7~ 3~ 2~. w~ n~d paragle! wi~6,sai~ nor~~ier~y >~ ine eet to said wester y line; thence north 15° ~~. ~30" west along said wester y line ~, 345 feet to the point of beginning . and WHEREAS, t;~e City Planning ComR~ission did hold a public hearing at the City Hell in the City of Anaheim on JanUary 8~ 14~2 at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of seid public hearing having been duly given as required •by Isw and in eccordence with the pmvisions of the Meheim Municipel Code, Chepter 18.72, to heai and consider evidence for end ageiaet seid ptoposed reclassificetion and to investigate and meke findings and recommendetions in conaection therewith; end . WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigetion, and study made by itseif end in its behalf, end after due consideration of ell evidence and ceports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following.fects: 1. That the petitioner proposes a recla~sificetion of the above descdbed property, from the R-1~ ONE FAMILY RESIDSNTIAL, and the R-2, TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, ZONES to the R-3, MULTIPLE FAMILY RESI- DENTIAL, ZONEo 2. That the proposed reclessification of subject property is necessery and/or desireble for the ocderly end pra per development of the community. 3. Thet the pcoposed :eclessification of subject property does properly relete to the zanes and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity to subject property end to the zones end their permi;ted uses generally esteb- lished thmu hout the rnmmunity. • 4e ~hat the proposed reclassification of sub3ect property does require dedication for and standard improvement of abutting streets because said property does relate io and abut upon streets and highways which are proposed to carry the type and quantity of tTaffic, which will be generated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation ~lement of the General Plano • ' ~ ' • ~ 5., That verbal opposition by three awners of property in subject area, in addition to a`,etition of protest containing 74 signatures, was recorded against subject petitiono , VerbaT support was recorded by one owner of property in subject area. Rl-A -1- „ w_ _ ~: : . ... ----- _. -~------_ --. ____..._ _..._ _.._.. _.~_.__. . ------ . :. ..._ . _ - -_._._.._ , ___ ^ . .-~: ~~ ~ ~ M . - ' ~ ~. .~ '. ' ... . . . ._. . . `~Sy,~j1 ~ . , . . . . ~~ ~ ; ~ f , ~ ; z i ~ ~ i --- _...~_..._.....:.,..., ...,,...>.~:::..,..._:_,..._.~___~..._. , - ------- __.._-----------._. _. _. _.--------- _--------- ~ . ~, . i: • ~ -~ ~ ~:..f•-~~°~..-~, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commisaion daes hereby recommend s. to th~~City Council of the City of Anaheim thet subject Petition for Reclassificetion be appmved er.d, by so doing, i~: that Ti~l~ 18-Zoning oE the Anaheim Municipel Code be emended to exclude the above described pmpe:ry from the R-1 ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL an~i $he R-2, TWO FAMILY f?ESIDENTIAL, Zones ~nd to incorpb"sa~e saic~ desCribed-property in the'R-3, MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, 2one, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the sub~ect property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens , of An2heim: lo Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Noso 1 and 2 with any substantial r.evision of development p2ans to be sub~ect to review by the Pianning Comma.ssion, and to be set for Public Hearing, and referral ~o the City Councilo 2a Payment of $2000 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Broadwayo 3o Installation of sidewalks and driveways on Broadway in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the Office of the City Engineero ~lo Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25000 per ,dwelling unit to be collected as • part of the Building Permito 5o Provisi.on of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation Division, wllich are adequate in size, accessible to trash-truck pick-up and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall, prior to Final Building Inspectiona 6o Installation of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the westerly boundary of sub3ect property prior to Fina1 Builaing Inspectione 7o Dedication of access r3ghts to the stub end of Oak Street and Chestnut Street and the alley connecting said streets in order to prohibit access to Oak and Chestnut Stxeets and the alley connecting said streetso 8e Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) deys for the accomplishment of Item Noso 2, 3, and 7a THF. FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end spproved by me this 8th day of January~ 19620 ~ ~ ~~. . CHAIR AN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION \ ATTEST: I ~. 5E ARY ANAHEIl11 CITY P~. NNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALTFORNIA ) • COUNTY CF OR~INGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Jean Page, Secretary of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Meheim, do hereby certify that the tore- going.resolution wes pessed and adopted et a meeting of the City Plenning Commission ofthe City of Aneheim, hald on January 8~ 1962 et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Gauer, Hapgood, Mungall, Pebley, Perry, Summerse NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Marcoux o ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None o IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hand this 8th day of Jar,uary~ 19620 . ~ • ~ SECRE ANAHEIM CITY PLAN G COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 191 ' ' I R2-A _2. ~ , i . I i _.. __-_._.~.~_ __ _ .__ -----. _.__. ~ ~ 1 ------- , ~,I _...~ '. . , , . . ... . ,ys~ . ~ .. _ _ _-- -