Loading...
PC 1961-1962-210~ r ~ v ~ -~~ ~' , ~ r '~ t ~ ~ ~ , . ' (" } ,~ ~ ' RESOLUTION NO. 210, SHRIES 1961-62 A RFSOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNuQG COMMISSTON OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM 7 THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL U~E PERMIT N0.195 gE DENIED : '~J %~ ~. .T~, r WHEREAS, the rity Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Conditionel Use Permit from SAM NAKAMURA, 2793 Ball Road, Anaheim, California, Owner; W. D. Newman, 2316 Pairhill Drive, Costa Mesa, Ca7.ifornia, Agent of certain real proper~ty situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as described in Hxhibit "A" or as follows: The west 135.00 feet of the south 365.00 feet of the west half of the southwest quarter of the Southeasc quar{er. of Section 13, Township 4 South, Ratlge 21 West, in the Rancho Los Coyotes, as said section is shown on a map recorded in Book 51, Page 11 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County, California. HXCBPT the north 175.00 feet thereof ; end WHEF.EAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing et !he City Hell in the City of Anaheim on January 22, 1962 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., noQice of seld public heedng hevIng beep duly given es required by law end iu eccocdance with the pmvisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.64, to hear and consider evidence for and ageinst said p'roposed conditional use end to investigate and make flndingc end recommendetions in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, efter due inspection, investlgation, and atudy mede by itself and in its behelf, and aftec due consideration of all evidence and reports offeied at seid heedng, does find and determine the following facts: 1. That the propc ied use is properly one for which a Conditionel Use Pecmit is authorized by this Code, to wit: A drive-through restaurant. 2. That the proposed use will adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the arr.a in which it is proposed to be located. 3, T~at the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is not adequate.to allow the full development o€ the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. 4. That the prcposed use would establish a precedent for development of other com- mercial facilities on properties abutting to the east of subject property which would not compliment an established community facility, namely, the Dale Junior High School, 5. That the subject and abutting properties to the north and the east, adjacent to the Dale Junior High School, would appear best suited for multiple famzly residential development. 6. That one owner of property in the vicinity of subject property appeared in opposition to subject petition. Cl-D -1- 'r f Si-_~~_".~.~... "_ ... ~ .....____._.~.y..._.~.~....._.,-~.. ~.. L. . . ..~ ~ . ... ._.__ a 1 :y a ~~~ .~ ~ ~~ ~i. _~ ~ ~ w~M,.~..~'.S~ ,~F f _t~` i ( ~ I ~~ ~ ~ ~4Tac v '_ - --;~x i, ~ 4 ~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anehelrp City Plenning Commission does hereby deny subject Petitian for Conditional Use Permit on the besis of the aforementioaed findings. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end appmved by me.this 22nd day of January, 1962. CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING.COMMISSIO ATTEST: ~ I SEC RY ANAHEIM CITY PL G COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ~ COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. . CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Jean F+age, Seccetery of the City Planning Com~Ission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certity that the fore- going resolution wes passed end adopted et e meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on January 22, 1962 , et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the [ollowing vote of the memb~rs theceoE: ' s 'IES: COMMISaIONERS: Allred, Gauer, Hapgood, Marcoux, Mungall, Pebley and Perry. NOES: COMMISSiONERS: None. ? ABSENT: COMMIS330NERS: Sunuuers. ' ~ ~ IN NITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand ttiis 22nd day of January, 1962. i i ' ~ i ~ i i SE TARY ANAHEIM CIT ANNING COMMISSION