PC 1961-1962-214!
1 ~ .~~ , ~ '
, ,, .
!~ 1 ., ,~
j ~;•~~---
;
~, l .
RESOLUTION NO. 214+ SHRIBS 1961-62
A RESOLUTION QF '1'HE CITY PLANNII'tG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF61H62 ~p OF ANAHEIb1 TFiAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. BE APPROVED
\
~_l
I NHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the Ci~ of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Recleseilce-
tionfrom M. 0, and BSTHHR C. WANG;3NSTH8N, 10 Hast Center Street, Anaheim, California,
Owners; James P. Walker, 1311 South Los Angeles Street, Anaheim, California, Agent; propos-
ing reclassification of the following described property: Legal description marked Hxhibit
"A", attached hereto, incorporated in file of subject petition and referred to herein as
though set forth in full
; and
WHEREAS, the Ciry Plenning Commission dId hold a public heedng et the City Hall in the City of Maheim on ~
January 22, 1962 at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of said public headng having been duly given es iequired•by "
lew aad in eccordance with the provisions of the Maheim Municipel Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear end conaider evidence ~
fot end against said ptoposed ceclassiEicetion end to investIgete and meke flndinga end eecommendatIona in connection ~
therewith; und ~ )
WHEREAS, seid Commission, after due inapectlon, invesHgetion, and etudy made by itself end in its behelf, end
efter due consideretion of all evidence end repoda offe:ed at seid heedng, does find end determine tb^ following fecte:
1. That the peUtioner progoses a teclassiEication of the above descdbed property from the R~A, RHSIDBNTIAL
pGRICULTURAL, ZONB to the R-3, MULTIPLS PAMILY RESIDHNTIAL, 20NB,
2. Thet the proposed recla:.sification oE subject propedy is necessery and/or desirable for the orderly end pro-
per development of the community.
3. Thet the propr,sed eeclessiflcetion of subject propeety does properly relete to the zones end'their pe:mitted
usee locally esteblished in close proximity to subJect property and to the zones and their permittxd uses generally eateb-
Ilehed throughout the community. '
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does require dedication
for and standard improvement of abutting streets because said property does relate to and
abut upon street~ and highways which are designed to carry the type and quantity of traffic
which will be generated by tiie permitted uses in accordance with the circulation elenent
of the General Plan. '
5. That one (1) letter of support and three (3) letters of opposition were filed with
the Commissior. relative to subject petition. '
Rl-A
~ : . ~. : __ s:w
-1-
~ ~ -
,.w.-
.tj~X,:.
~::~;
~..: :
-KI;i
~n __ _.
jJ
; ~ ~` ;~
.~
, .
~. /
~ /
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend
to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subject Petition for Reclessification be approved nnd, by so doing,
thet Title 18-ZonIng of the Anaheim Municipal Code be emended to exclude the ebove deacribed property from the
R-A, RHSIDBNTIAL AGRICULTURAL, 20N8 and to incorporate said described property in the R-3,
MULTIPLB PAMILY RHSTDBNTIAL, ZONH, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be
a necessary prerequ3site to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve
the safety anQ general welfare nf the Citizens of Anaheim:
1. Payment of $2,00 per fiont foot ior street Iighting purposes on Vermont Avenue.
2. Instaliation of sidewalks on Vermont Avenue in accordance with the adoptc:d standard p'...ns
on file in the Office of the City Engineez.
3. Repair of curbs and gutters on Vermont Avenue in accordance with the~adopted standa:d
plans on file in the Office of the City Bngineer.
4, payment of a park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be collected as part
of the Building Permit. •
5. Provision of trash storage areas as determine3 by the Depart~ent of Public Works,
Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size and accessible to trash-truck pick-up and
adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wnll prior to Final Building Inspection.
6. Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Item Nos. 1,
2, and 3,
7, Installation of a six (6) foot masonry wall along all boundary linesof subject property,
except the Vermont Avenue frontage and the eastern most boundary line of subject property,
where said property abuts property classified in the R-3, Multiple Family Residential,
Zone prior to Pinal Building Inspection. '
8. Provision oE ten (10) by twenty (20) foot garages in accordnnce with Municipal Code
requirements.
9. Development of subject property in accordance with standard R-3, Code requirements,
THE F012EGOING RESOLUTION is sIgned end epproved by me thia 22nd day of January, 1962.
:~
;.`,
;j
~t i
:~ ;
~
, ~
I
~~ ~
.~ I
~
ci
~~~
c .. _i.
ATTEST:
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMIS
RCTARY ANAHEIM CIT Pt p~NING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY CF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Jean Page, Secretaq~ of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
going resolution was pessed and adopted at a meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim, held on !
January 22, 1962 et 2:00 o'clock P,M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Gauer, Hapgood, Marcoux, Mungall, Pebley, and perry. }
NOES: COMMISSIONERS• 1:one.
ABSENT: COMMIS~?ONEIe~. Summers. ~
:•: WITNESS WHEREOF, I i.e, ~; aereunto set my hend this 22nd da of i
Y January, 1962. ,
i
~ ;
SEC ARY ANAHEIM CITY P NNING COMMISSION '
~.
R~SOLUTION N0. 214 '
R2-A _2. '
t
r
~ ..... _ _ .
__..,~_.... _ ' ' ~ ''i ^
.~.°~ . 1 . { . . . _ _ i . . . "
~ . . ~- . ..... __ ....
..rJ r