PC 1961-1962-225i
I t~ ~' ~Q: ' ~
1
.,:: •., ...., . ,_..
,.... _.._..~__._.,,,,~.,M,....,... _._. ,,.~,,.,,.~,,:.~,~„ .......
. . . ... .. ,.
.,. .._.__...,~ „~.:.. ,.._. ,. .,,. ....,.
.Y ~, .. .. ..
f T~
,;~~. ~ c ~;~
RESOLUTION NO. 225+ 3BRIBS 1961-62
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIlH
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE.CITY OF ANAH~IM THAT
PETITION Fl3R RECLASSIFICATION' NO. ~1-G2-74 BE DENIED
WIiEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim did ro::eive e verified Petit~on foa Reclassifica-
tion &om PAUL PLBTZ, 3302 West Ball Road, Anaheim, Cali:ornia, Owner; Rothmaa-Steen,:617..
South Harbor Boulevard, Suite C,.;Anaheim, California, Agents; proposing reclassification of
the following described property: Legal descra.ptioa marked Bxhibit "A", attached hereto,
incorporated in file of subject petition and referred to herein aS though set forth in full
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold e pqblic headng et the City Hell •in the City of Aneheim on
Pebruary 5, 1962 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid publlc heering having been duly given es tequited
by law and in eccordence with the provisione of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.72,to hear and consider evi-
dence for end egaiast aeid proposed ceclassificetion end to inveatigate and make findings end cecommendetions ia
cronnection therewltl~: end
WHEREAS, seid Commission, after due inspection, investigation, end study mede by itself end in ite behelf,
and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at aeid hearing, does find end determine the following
facts:
1. Tkat the petitioner pcoposes a reclassificaUon of t3te ebove desceibed pcoperty from the R-1 , ONE FAM I LY
RESIDENTIAL, and the R-0, RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN, 20NESto the C-l, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL,
ZONE for Parcel No. 1 and to the R-3, MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, ZONE for Parcel No. 2.
2. That the proposed reclassification of subJect property is not necessary or
desirable for the ordetly and proper development of the community.
3• That the proposed reclassification of subject property does not properly rela~e
to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proocimity to subject
property and to the zones and their permitted uses generall,y established throughout the
community.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does not conforrh to the
intent of Precise Plan Study No. 29-94-2 as recommended by the Planning Commission to the
City Council for the ultimate development of the subject property and that the Planning
Commission does hereby re-affirm said recommendation, thereby keeping faith in the matter
of resotving the•problems affecting those properties located on the west side of East Street
between Water Street and South Street.
5. That verbal opposition by five owners of property in subject area, in.addition
to a petition of protest containi~g 59 signatures, was recorded against subject'petition.
Rl-D -1-
.. . x -
_._ ._._.._------ --~-w .-- ---- -~- _~ ..
_ ~ ~ ~ , , __ . _. ---_ .
~
~~~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOII.VED thet the Aneheim City Plaaning Commies3on does hereby cecommend
to the Ci:y Couacil of the City of Aneheim thot aubject Petltioa for Reclasai8cation be deaied on the b~~sis of the
aforementioaed findinge.
TF:E FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end epproved by me this S~h.day of Pebruary,1962,
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST: ,
SECR Y ANAHEINf CITY PLA G COMMISSION
ST OF CALIFORNItA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Jean page, Secretery of the City Planniag Commieaioa of tf« City of Aaeheim, •do hereby certify that the foee-
going resolution was passed epd edopted at a meetiag of We City Planniug Commiesion of the City of Anaheim, held oa
Februar~ 5, 1962 at 2:00 o'dock P.M., by the ~ollowing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMIVIISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Hapgood, Marcoux, Mungall,
, Pebiey, Perry.
NOES: COMMISSIONER5: None.
ABSENT: COh~VIISSIONERS: None.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I 6ave hereunto aet my hend this 5th, day of Pebruary~ 19fi2.
,
SECRET Y ANAHEIM CITY PL G COhtMISSION
RES~DLUTION NO. 225
R2-D -~
~_ , r ~ ~~ . ~ --~`~~. . ._ __.~ _ . ~