PC 1961-1962-245i i E ~:
` ' ' il
~
~:: ~ 6 :~' ~:~ '~ ~
,
;~
;;~
%:;~
>;I
~; a
's~
:I
;,
;:,
;I
!I
'
'I
,
'.ji
1
i;~
,
.1
-~
~'~
I
.f
~~
;
tif
;~'~
:I
;
''i
;'~
~i
;'i
;±
i
,
$ ~`~ 245, SERIES 1961-62 ;;~w
RESOLUT~ ~NO. ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2~8 BE DENIED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City oE Anaheim did ceceive e verified Petition for Conditional
Use Pecmitfcom FINIEY and MAXINE LEWIS, 931 South Magnolia Avenue, Anaheim, Californid,
PAUL Eo and MARIBEL TRAVER, 927 South Magnolia Avenue, Anaheim, California, and NANTE F.
and JUANITA Fo CRAIG, 923 South Magnolia Avenue, Anaheim, California, Owners; VIOLA B.
MURRAY, 15118 Highway 39, Midway City, California, Ageni;, for certain real property
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as
followsa
Lot Noso 124, 125, and 126 of Tract Noo 1951
; end
WHEF.EAS, ttSe City Planning Commission did hold e public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim o~i
February 19~ 1962 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing having beep duly given as requiced by
law end ih accordence with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18:64, to hear and consider evidence
for and agaiast said proposed conditional use and to investigete and nake findings and rscommendetione in connection
thecewith; end
WHEREAS, said Comminsion, after due inspection, investigetion, end study made by itself and in its behelf,
end aEter due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at seid hearing, does find and determine the following fects:
1. Thet the proposed use is properly one for which a Conditional Use Permit is autncrized by this Code, to wi~:
a service stationo
2o That the proposed use of subject property could not be established under the
present classification of said property in the R-1, One Family Residential,
Zoneo
3~ That no one ~ppeared in opposition to subject petitiona
Cl-D
-1-
~ _. .___ ------ ~ _ .. _-
_ _. _._. ._
_ . _~.~ . 'a ~ • ~ __.
_ .- . . Y~~ . ~ ~ '
~7
~ ,
, ~ ''
r 0 ~.b-~ ~}
. .;,,
~
.-. ...
~ I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Aneheim City Planning Commission does heteby deny subject
~; Pe t i t ion for Con d itiona l Use Peccnit •wit hout prejudice on•-the•~bases-of'the aforementioned findingso
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and eppmved by me•thie 19tho day of February, 19620
• • ~ ~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIIVI CITI PL,~INNING COMMISS
ATTEST:
~Y V /
5EC Y ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIN OMMISSION
, STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
~ COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Jean Pege, Secretery of the City Pianning Commiesion of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certi£y thet the fore-
going resolution wes passed end adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commisaion ofthe City of Aneheim, held on
February 19~ 1962 , et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the iollowing vote of the membeta theceof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Hapgood, Marcoux, Mungall,
Pebley, Perry.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None o
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None o
IN WITNESS PlHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand thie 19tho day of February~ 1962.
SECRETA APIAHEIM CITY PLANN COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 245 •
C.UePo 208
C2-D .2-
..,_ _.. _ _...
_ ... ,
q .