PC 1961-1962-260_
: ~/' y .,~,
: .
~ `' ~ ~ ~ , , .
; r
i, ,
. ~~:
~ ~: u
' RESOLUTIOAa`N0. 260, SHRIES 1961-62 ~'~' _
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 1452 gE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Planning CommissIon of the City of Aneheim did receive e verified PetiUon for Vadance from
MARY B. DOHSKBN, 2748 West Ball Road, Anaheim, Califorhia, .~wner; G. G. Lamkin, 730 West
I{atella Avenue, Anaheim, California, Agent of certain real property situated in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as described in Exhibit "A" or as follows:
The west 132 feet of the east 661 feet of the north half of the northwest quarter of the
northeast quarter of 5ection 24, Township 4 South, Range 11 West, in the Rancho Los Coyotes,
as shown on a Map recorded in Book 51, page 11 of Miscellaneous Diaps, records of
Orange County, California
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold e public hearing et 4he City Hell in the City of Anaheim on
March 5, 1962 et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said publlc headng heving been duly g~ves~ ea required by
law and in eocordence with the provisions of the Meheim Municipel Code, Chapter 18.68, to hear and conaider evidence for
and against said propased varience and to investigate end make finding's end recommendetlons in connectioa therewith;
end
WHEREAS, seid Commission, eEter due inspection, investigation, end study made by itself and in its behelf,
and after due consideeation of ell evidence and reports offered es said headng, does find and detecmine the following
fecta:
1. Thet the petitioner requests a vedance from the Aneheim Municipel Code: Section 18.32,060 and
Section 18.32,090 for waiver of wall and single story height requirements.
2. That there are~no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicaUle to the property involved or to the intended use of the property 4hat do not
apply generally to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
' 3, That the requested variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment
of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone,
and denied to the property in question.
4. That the requested variance will be materially detrimental to the publzc
welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which
the property is located.
5. That at the present time there is a problem of drainage and flooding in the
subject area which necessitates consideration before development of subject area is
established.
6. That the proposed two story multiple family residential development of subject
property would permit an encreachment into the R-1, One Pamily Residential, development in
subject area,
7. That a more suitable plan for the ultimate development of the suoject and abu#ting
properties is possible and it is hereby suggested that the petitioners endeavor to
develop plans which would promote the highest and best use of tlie subject property and for
the ultimate development in the subject area.
8, That verbal opposition, in addition to a petition of protest c~ntaining 33
signatures, was recorded in protest to subject petition. That verbal support by two owners
of abutting properties was recorded in favor of subject petition.
~ ~ Vl'D• -1-
. . . •
i _ . _ _ ._ __.
_. _ ~
f~
- {, ..f_ '._
~: ~ ~•• ~ . •~ ~ ~ -~~~~ f ~ ~,~~i
` '
i:
t
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Maheim City Plenniag Commleaioa does hereby dany eub)ect
PetlUon Eor Vadence on the bases of the efocementioaed fiadinge.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me khis 5th, day of March, 1962.
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CIT]t PLANNING COMMISSION
A'TTEST:
SECR Y ANAHEIM CITY PLA G COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) .
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. ~
CITY OF ANAHEIM . )
I, Jean Page, Sectetery of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim,, do heceby certify that the fore-
going cesoluUon was pessed end adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission ofthe City of Aaeheim, held oa
March 5, 1962 at 2:00 o'clock p,M„ by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Hapgood, Marcoux, Mungall,
Pebley, Perry.
NOE3: COMMISSIONERS: None .
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hgreunto aet my hend thls Sth, day of March, 1962,
~ '
SECRE Y ANAHEIM CITY P ING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 260
Variance No. 1452
V2-D '
_2.
~
,~ .
. __~
. _ - _ .~:::1 x.
-- -- . , - - aY;:? - ~ . . ,~"rs' . . ... . . . . .. . . . ...__. .