PC 1961-1962-314/ .~
^ -• . ` ~ 314. SERIES 1961-62 ~~
FtESOLUTI01~"~NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CIT'Y OF ANAHEiM '->;;
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0: i473 SE GRANTEA ' _
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commisaioa of the City of Anaheim did eecolve a veri$ed Petition for Vedance
from HERMAN and HELEN L. JONES~ 1014 .Izene.Pla~e, Anaheim, Califorria, Ovmer of certain real
property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange,State nf...California, as follows,
Lot 59 0~ Txact 2326,..and further described as 1014 Irene P1ace; Anaheim Calif.nrnia
; end
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commissioq did hold a publlc hesdng at 4he City Hell in the City of Anaheim ~-;t
on May 14~ 1462~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public headng havieg been duly given es requimd ~~
by law and.in accordence wlth the ~provisions of the Aaeheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.68, to heac and coasider '°r
evideace ~oc ac~d egainat said pcoposed veriance end to iaveatigate and make findinge end cecommendations la connec- `~z
tion thecewith; and .
WHEREAS, said Commisaian, eEter due inspeetlon, investigation, and study mede by itaelf and in its behalf,
,.i
and aftee due consideratioa of ell evidence and ~cepocts offered as seid hearing, doea ~ind end determine the follo~ing ~
(HCte: ~ . ~ ,
1. That tha petitioner requests a vatiance from the Anahe~m Municipel Code: SeCtion 18.22.030 (3) to permit `i
an encroachment'of twenty (20) feet into rear yard, to permit the enclosure of a patio.
,*
: ;~
iil.
2. That thece ere exceptional or extreordinary citcumsteaces or conditions appliceble to the p~opeity involved `k
or to the intended use Of the propecty that do not epply generally to ffie peoperty oe cless of use in the same vicinity ;
and zone. '=i
3. Thet the requested varience is necessery foc the peeservetion and enjoyment of a rsubstantial property right F~,
possessed by other propert•~ in the seme vicinity end zone, and denied to the ptopeity in question. ,
4. That the requested varlence will not be materielly detrimentel to the public welfase or injuelous to the pmp- ''~!
eriy or improvements in such vicinity and zone ia which the pmperty is located.
~ 5. Thet the cequested vatiaace will not adve~sely affect the Comptehansive Geaeral Plen. ~
6. That no one appeared in opposition to sub~ect petition. '~'
`.'<
Vl-G
,F,.
---
- -~--- --~ - - - ---•--- -
--_ _ . ~ ~
-1-
--_.....~ .:-- -_........_ . __,.. a
, . • ,. _ _ _-- .._ .
~ . ... ~
,,: .~,-,:
' ) ~y~
~ NOW; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Aneheim City Plenning Commission does heceby grant subject
Pe4itlon for Vadence, upon ffie following conditioas which ace hereby found to be a necessery ptecequieite to the pto-
posed use of the subject property ia ocder to pieserve the safety aad general welfere of the Citizens of ffie City of
Anaheim.
1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2, except that a
maximwn encroachment of 17~ feet shall be permitted.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is si~ed and epproved by me thie 14th day of May~ 1962.
!
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIl1'I CITY PI.ANNING COMh!
ATTEST:
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAIiEl~d )
I~ Ann Krebs~ Seaetary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Meheic:, do heceby certify that the foce-
going resolution was passed end adopted at a meetiag of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, held on
May~ 14' 1962, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of Lhe members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Camp, Chavas, Gauer~ Hapgood, Marcoux, Munga119 Pebley9 Perry.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None>
AHSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allred.
IN pITNESS WHEREOF, I haye hexeunta set my hand this 14th day Of Mays 1962.
~~~'.Z~~%~~~~~
SECRETARY ANAH~.IM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 314
V'2-G
_ .. ._ ~ --
~
_Z.
___ .,..,.. - . . _ _ _, 3
~ _- - -
i ~. ... _. _ . -- - -~