PC 1961-1962-334..,~.~'~ I~~ ~
~~ ~., ~ ~ ~ ~ I
' '1
i::',:., ~
S
. '~
r:; ~
~`:~
('; .
i`: ;
.~ ~.
i } ;~
RESOLUTION NO 334~ SERTES 1961-62
A RESOLUTION OF THE CTTY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.2~y. BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Pianning Commiseio~ of the City of Maheiin did receive e verified Petition for Conditional
Une Permitfrom ALBAN and BERNADINE HOLTZ, 534 West Laveta, OrangeT California, 0-mers of'
certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California
as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referred to herein as though set forth in
full
; and
WHEREAS, Lhe City Flenning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
May 28~ 1962, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of ssid public headng having beep duly given as required by
law and in accordence with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipel Code, Chepter 18:64, to hear end consider evidence
for end against seid proposed conditionel use and to investigate and meke findinga end recommendetions in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, seid Commission, efter due inspection, investigetion, and study mede by itself end in its behelf,
and efter due consideration of all evidence and eeports offeeed et suid hearing, does find end dete~mine the following fads:
1. Thet the proposed use is properly one for which e Conditional Use Pe:mit is aathorized by lhis Code, to wit:
establish a service station.
2. That the proposed use will adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the grow-
th and development of the area iri which it is proposed to be located.
3. That in a planning study the Commission went on record as opposi'ng the commercisi
development at sup~eci: intersection, that there was adequate service station f acilities
for the area, that there seemed to be no need for four service stations at sub~ect inter-
section, and thet consideration should be taken as to the highest and best land use
developieent for subject area.
4. That 18 persons aPeeared before the Commission in opposition to sub~ect_petitiqn;
two persons presenting petitions with 120 signatures of neighboring property owners in
opposition to subject petition.
Cl-D
-1-
,.._._ .__...._.__._._ .___ _ _ _.-
: -------------r-_ __ __ _........_ ._ ._...__._ __
i
--~ `' ,~ _
. _. _ _
_ .. . _ .. .
_. a,,.~ ' ~
::1
o - ~ ~ ~ :~~ , ~~~
.., . : . .,, ~~
. ~ . ..
A ;:
~
~
1~
i.T
,E
~.
~
-~
~~~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Anaheim City Plenning Commission does hereby deny subject
Petition for Conditional Use Permit on the basis of the aforementloned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION ie atgned end approved by me.this 28th day Of May~ 1962.
. ' ' ~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIO
ATTEST:
~~2'~'~' ~ %~~/2.C~L~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss,
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs~ Secretary of the City Plenning Commiesion of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
going resolution wes passed end edopted et e meeting of the City P1ennIng Commission ofthe City of Anaheim, held on
May 28~ 1962~ . at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the membera thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred~ Camp, Chavos; Gauer, Hapgood~ Marcoux, Mungall~ Pebley,
Perry.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
~AHSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend this 28th day Of May~ 1962.
~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. 334
C2-D _~
------ --- -----r. .. _ _-- - _ __ _ __. ... .. _ _ _ ___ . __ ... _ . ____ _ __ --
., . - ,.
_ ~:, ~ ~.~
~ . y~ ,,_.....__ ,.