PC 1961-1962-348
~ ~,
../~ ~~
J ~
l
~1 ~'~~
~ J .
F
~
f
1 ~~,
.
. . . . ~.. ~~ . %h . .....~.....~..n~....,.... .r...... .. ,.,.:. ~ ~
. ~ . . . _„ .-. . _ ..,..-..f:. ., .. ._ ,. ~.~.. .. .: ~...,.~...... .
~ .. .. ...., ,"~__n~_ ~ ~..~.-.~..:: .,.:~~•..,....
,~ ~ ..... . . . . . . ... . . . _. _ . . ..
.~ '~ ~.~ L
RESOLUTIOi~ NO, 348. SERIES 19b1-62 '~~ ~~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANI~ING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 242 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Conditional
Use Permitf:om MADRONE INVESTMENT OOMPANY, 5776 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California, Owners; ;
ROTHNAN-STEEI~ and ASSOCIATES, 617 South Harbor Boulevar~, Anaheim, California, Agents of
certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orangei State of California,
as fallows; the South 5 acres of the North 10 acres of the West~ 20 acres of the Northone-half
of the Northwest quarter of Section 18, Township 4 South, Range 10 West, S. B. B. & M. Ex-
cept3ng an undivided one-half interest in and to all oil, gas, minerals, and hydrocarbon
substances in, on or under said land, without, however, the right of entry upan any
portion of the surface of said land f or the purpose of exploring for, boring, ~i~ing, drill-
in~ removing, extracting or marketing said substances as reserved in the deed from Joseph
D. Huarte and wifey recorded August 19, 1955, in Book 3179' page 421 of Official Records
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hell in the City of Aneheim on
June 11~ 1962, at 2:00 dclock P.M., notice of seid public hearing having been duly given es reqixired by {
law and in accordance with the provisions of the MaUaim Municipal code, Chapter 18.64, to hear and consider evidence
for and ageinst seid proposed conditional use and to investigate end meke findings end recommendations ia connection
theeewith; and '
;i
WHEREAS, seid Commission, after due inspe%t?aa, iavestigaticn, and study made by itself and in its behalf, and
after due consideretion of all evidence and rep~~ta off~red et said headng, does find and determine the following fects:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a Condilionai ,Use Permit is authorized by this Code, to ;
wit: establish a multiple family plannEd unit development.
2. Thet the pcoposed use will not edversely effect the edjoining land uses end the growth and development of ~~
the area in which it is proposed to be located.
3. That the size end shepe of the site pcoposed for the use is adequete to allow the fuli development ofthe ,
proposed use in a manner not detrimentel to the perticular area nor to the peece, health, sefery, end general welfere
of the Citizens of the City of Meheim. ;
4. Tliat the grenting of L~e Conditionel Use Permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will ~iot be detrimentel
to the peace, health, sefety, and general welfere of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
5o That th~ traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon
the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area.
6e That one person appeare~l in opposition to the oriqinal plans.
7. That Condition t1o. 2 of Reclassification No. 60-61-54 af the pending reclassif ication:
.to R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zor~e requiring the recordation of a final tract map on ~
sub~ect property would have to be amended by the City Councils that Variance No. 1334 be
terminated since it was na longer applicable to said property. •
Cl-G _l.
, ______ _. _--. _ ._._..__.._ . ---- -.. ----
~ __-- - -_ _. _ _
.~, _ _ .____._ ................
ri ~
_ .. ''~ .
.. ~ :..._. ,._..--,-- . _.._- --.____..___.~................~. _____._.__~.____._-----__..___ ~. ., - . _ _
NqW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESO?%""D that the AnahPim City Plannirs''~ Commission does hexeby grant
subject Petition for Conditin~ai.~se .Permit, upon the following c~,~dit3.ons which are here~y found
to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use.of.the subject pxoperty 3n order to preserve
the safety and general. welfare _of _tne.Cit3.zens-nf. tne C3ty_of. Anaheims
lo Dedication of 53.f.eet f.ram.the mantunented centerline.of Magnolia Avenue (30 feet existing).
2, Preparation of street.improvement plans and installation ot all improvements for Magnclia
Avenue, subject to the approval of the Gity Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard
plans on file in the off ice of the City Engineer.
3. Payment of $2.Q0 per front foo~ for stree.t ligh~ing purposes on Magnolia Avenue.
4~ Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of 825o0Q pex dwelling unit to be collected as part of the
Building Permit.
5. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, Sanitation
Division, which are adequate in size, accessible to trash-truck pickup, and adequately enciosed
by a solid fence or wall, prior to.Final Building Inspection.
6. Provision of a thxee (3) fno.t puhlfc utility easement and a two (2) foot overhan5 easement
northerly and southerly; a f ive (5) foat.public utility easement and a th.ree (3) footJoverhang
ea6ement easterly~ along the said.boundaxie.s af the.subject property to adequately serve the
subject property and other. properties, at the time af the installation of the service facilities.
7. Access drives shall kre a minimum of twenty-one(2~ feet in width with adequate angle cu~off s pro-
vided, or a mfnimum of twenty-eight (28) feet in widta if no cutoffs are provided and, in all cases,
shall have a minimnm ver~ical clearance of f~usteen (14) feet.
8. Installation of fire hydrants, as determined to be necessary by the City of Anaheim Fire Marsh-
all, to provide adequate fire protection.
9. Drainage from the east shall be accepted in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer.
10. Tima limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of I+,em Nas. 1, 2, 3,
and 6.
11. Development substantialiy in accordance with revised Exhibit Nos. la~ 2a, 3a, and 4a except .
as amended herein.
12. Provision of finishing of three (3) sides of the interior of the carports with stuccos
installation of btmper guards at the front of said carportss and the installation of enclosed trash
storage cabinets in said carportsd
13. InstalTation of a six (6) foot masonry wall on the north, east and south boundaries of sub-
Ject propertyo
14. Subject to the reclassif ication'of sub~ect property to the R-3, Afiultiple Family Resideni:ial
Zone, and in accordance ~ith Reclassification No. 60-51-54, as amended by the City Council regard-
ing amendment of Conditioq':;No. 2 of Resolution of Intent No. 6722 passed by the City Council on
March 7y 1961 omitting refeience to recordation of a final tract mapj requesting that Veriance
No. 133~ be terminated, said variance having been filed in conJunction with Reclaseif ication
No. 6A-61-54, and which is no longer applicable.
THL• I~R~OIIVG RESOLUTION is signed and apprbved by me this llth day of June, 1962.
' CHAIRMAN-ANAHEZ',~A CITY PLAt~NING ODMMISSION
ATTEST:
~'! ' .
SECREI'ARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING OOMMISS'^'~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
CC?1NTY OF ORAhGE )ss
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim,_ do hereby certify
th~t the f oregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a me~tinq of the City Planning CortynissLon
of the City of Anaheim, held on June 11, 1962, at 2:00 o'clock P^M.~ by the f~llowing vote of
the members thereofj
AYESc COMh1ISSI0NER5sCamp~ Chavos~ Gauer, Marcaux, M•angall, Peb~ey, Perry.
NOESe OOMMISSIONERSsNone. ~
ABSENTs ODMMISSIQNHRS:Allred, Hapgood.
IN WITNESS WHERBJF~ I have hereuntn set my hand thls llth day of June~ 1962.
i
SECR&TARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING OOMMISSION
~: RESOLJTIQN N~. 348 " j
_2_ ;
- C2-G
a
f
'.,_; .-:rw-ns -- ----r _...._._.----..---..- -----... _____ ....----__ ._.. .. i
, _._. ._._..----...~~_._.._---- _ _ ... . .
---°-
~y~y _ _
~. . . ... ~ Xs,~ • .. ~ ~~5 . -