PC 1961-1962-373;-'r
~
. ' . ~ . - ~ k~., .
. . • ~ ~. ' ~ . ~ .~.
' ~ RE50LUTION N0.-373~ SERIES 1961-62
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COtTIVCIL OF THE CITy OF ANAHEIM THAT ~
PETITION FOR RECLASSIk'ICATION NO. 61-b2-119 gE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commiseion of the City of Anehetm did recefve e vedfied Petition for Reclea'sifica- . ~
tionfrom HARRY IWISELY~ 730'West Katella, Anaheim, California, Owr.er of certain real prop~rty ?
situated in~the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California as follows: Lot Nos. ?
9, 10, and 11 in Tract 2903 and furtner described as 1515, 1523, and 1531 West Katella Avenue, ;
Anaheim~ California ~
.. ~
. ; ead
WHcREAS, the Ciry Plenning Commiesion did hold a public headng at the Cfty Hell in the Ciry of Anaheim on
June 11~ 1962~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of seid public headng havin~ been duly glven as requiced •by
law and ia eccordance with the provisions of the Maheim Municipel Cade, Cheptet 18.72, tu heai and coneider evidence ~.
for end egeinst seid ptoposed reclasslficetion and to investigete end meke findings end recommendetiona in coanection
therewith; end
WHEREAS, seid Commiasion, eEter due inspectiai, investigaUon, end study mede by itself end in lts behalf, end `
a$er due conaideretion of all evidence and ceports offered et seid heering, does find end determine the following fects: '
1. Thet the petitioner propoaes e reclessification of the above descdbed property from the R-1~ One Family ~
Resideritial, Zone to the C-1, Neighborhood Commercial, Zone to establish business and pro-
fe3sional offices and church activities.
. ;
~
2. That the proposed reclessificetion of subject property is neceasary and/or deaiteble for the o:detly end pro-
per developnent of the community.
3. Thet the pcoposed recleasification of subject propeety does properly relate to the zonea end'thelr petmitted
uses locelly eatebliehed in close proximity to subject propeKy end to the zones end their permitted usea generally eateb- +
lished througnaut the community. . ~
4. That the proposed rec~.assification of subject property does not require dedicatioq
for and standard improvement of abutting streets.because said property does relate to and
abut upon streets and highways which are improved to carry the type, and quant=ty of traff ic
wh!ch will be generated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation element 1
of the General Plan. •
. _ -_.~ .., . ~
,:: 3 t,e,
.~ _ .
~ ~ ' f~
_. ~ .y a
. , '~`~ ; ~,
NC~W, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOJ iiED thet the Aneheim City Planning Commission does heeeby zscommsnd
o the City Council of the City of An~iheim thet subject Petition fot ReclassiEicetion be approved and, by so doing,
iat Title 1&Zoning of the Maheim 'dunicipai Code be emended to exclude the abave described property from the
=T, One Family Residential, Zone and to incorporate said described property in the C-1,
eighborhood Commercial, Zone upon the f.ollowing conditions which are hereby fbund to be
necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the sub~ect property in order to preserve
he safety and geneial welfare of the citizens af the City of Anaheim.
1. Payment of $2.00 per front foot f.or street Lighting puiposes on Katella Avenue
nd Bayless Street.
2. Provision of. trash•starage.areas as determined.by the Department of Public Works,
anitation Division, which.are adequa~te..in size,, accessible to trash-trucic pickup,. and ..
de.quaiely enc].o~ed.by a solid fence or wall, prior to Fina1 Building Inspection.
3. Time limitation of. one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of
tem Na. L
4• Recordation of deed re=trictions limiting the use of subject pxoperty to church pu
vsiness and professional offices only.
~ 5. . Provision of a six (6) foot masonry wall to tk~a rear of sub3ect property, said
~all to match masonry. wall abutting subject property.
6. Sub~ect to the approval of the Architectural Control Committee fo: any alterations
,o any existing structures.
7. Provision that subject structures shall remain as R-1 single family residences
intil bu3ldings a•re completed prior to Final Building Inspection.
8. That a common driveway be used between Lot Nos. 9 and lo-~ ar.d sl~all be maintained
~y both property owrcers of adjoining said drivev~ay.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIOIv is signed and appmved by me this llth day of June~ 1962.
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISS '
ATTEST:
____~95f "~:.~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMft7ISSI0N
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY CF ORANGE ) ss.
C~'t u'r" ANAHEIM )
Iy Ann Krebsa Ser.retery of the City Plenning Commissiun o: the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify thet the fore-
going resolution wes passed and edopted at a meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anah@im, held on
June lly 1962y et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the foilowing vote of the me~becs thereof:
AYES: COMNfISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos~.Gauerq Nlarcoux9 Mungall~ Pebley, Perrp.
NOES: COMMI55IOTERS: Paone.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Hapgood.
IN WITNESS WHFREOF, I have hecFUnto stt my he,nd this llth d0y of Juney 1962.
~;`~~l//5~~r~~/
SECRETAR': ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
i
~
~;
~~:.
RESOLUTION NO. 3!~ '
R~-A
-Z-
~
"'
~ ~
_..._...-----..~..._ _. ..,.._.._.....:.. ,
..-- - --- _--,-~. _
F.~.-..~._,.._...__. -
~~ . .