PC 1961-1962-377.> ,
~
~. ,: ~~` .' ~ , ~ :~ ~ i . .~.
~.,.
A - ~ ~ 377, SEi2IES 1961-62 '~
RESOLUTION N0. -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANANEIlN
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 149b BE GRANTED
~Y~:EREAS, the City Plenning Commiseion of the City nf Anehelm did eeceive a vedfied PeUtion foc Vadance
t,ro;n JOHN R.,NETHERY, 911 Nutwood, Anaheim' Cali:ornia~ Owner of certain real property sit-
t~at~ed in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as followst Lot No. 29
in Tract 2426, and further described as 911 Nutwood, Anaheim, California
; end
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commiealon did hold a public hearing et the City Hell in the City of Aneheim
on JUne 25 ~ 1962, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notictr of seid public headng having been ~uly given es required
by law and in nccordence with tha p:ovisions of the Maheim Municipal Code, Chepter IC.68,to hear end considee
evidence for and egeinat seid prop4sed verience and to lne~etigote and meke findings end recommendetions in connec-
tion therewith; qnd
WHEREAS, seid Commieslon, after dne inspection, investigetlan, ead study made by itself end ia its Lehalf,
and eftet due consldetetion of all evidence and ceporte offered ae seid hearing, does find end determine the following
fects:
1. Thet the,patitionet requests a verience from the Aneheim Municipel Code: • SeCtion 18.24.030 (3~ to
construct an addition to an existing single family residence.
2. That thece ere exceptionel ot extraordinary circumstencea or conditions eppliceble to the proporty involved
ot to the intended use of the pcoperty that do not epply generelly to the property or ciesa of use in the seme vicinity
and zone.
3. That the requested verience is neceasary fot the pres2rvetion ar.d enjoyment of a subsfentiel pcopeKy dght
poaseased by othet property in the same vlcirtity end zone, and denied to the property in queation.
4. Thet the requested verience will not be meteda:ly detrimentel to the public welfate or injuriaua to the pmp-
erty or improvementa in euch vicinity end zonq in which the property is loceted.
• 5. Thet the iequested vedance will not edvetaely affect the Com zehenaive General Alen.
6. That no one appeared in opposition to subjec~t petition.
Vl-G
'v.
"r-,:
- - - ~
. ~ ~ . y
~ ~. , ~ '°'9P\ ~ ..
r
~ F ~ ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1'!' RESOLVED thet the Aneheim City Plenn g Commission does heceby grant subject ~
PP#itlon for Varience, upon the following conditions whfch ere hereby found to be e necessary prereqaisite to tlie pro- =
'` poer,d uae of the subJect propeety in order to pressrve the safety end general welfere of the Citizene of the ~ity of ~
;S+ Ane.`~eim. •i
1. Substantially in accordance with Exhibit No. 1. '
i 'S.
c
~.
~ Y
~. i
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end epproved by me this 25th day Of June~ 1962.
• CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PI.ANNING COMMISSIO
ATTEST: ;
~`r~' l.C/'~
SECF.ETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLAYNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) as,
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs~ Secretery of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Meheim, do hereby certify thet the fore- ~
going resolution wea pessed end edopted at e meeting af the City Plenning CommissIon ef the City oE Anaheim, held on ;
Julle 25~ 1962~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the membera thereof: ~
i
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:Camp~ Chavos~ Gauer, Marcoux, Mungali~ Pebley.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None. ~
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:Allred~ Hapgood~ Perry. !
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto aet my hend this 25th day of June~ 1962.
'
j
SECRE:'PARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ,
R~SOLUTION N0. 377
V2-G
_2.
t
F
}
,
_
_ 1
~_._.._
=:i
-- --_.------_.___.._...-.
ti
- - ~a
~ ' .~