PC 1962-1963-459~ .
„ "
+ RESOLUTIO~NO. 459, SERIES 1962-63 ~-~
A RESOLUTION Ur' THE CFTY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT 1~ETITION FOR YARIANCE NO. 1518 BE GRANTED •
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Meheim did receive e ved8ed PetiUon for Vadance
from R~NALD SHIZUD~TATSUTA,.2807 Puritan Place, Anaheim, California, Owner of certain real
pr~perty situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California as follows:
Lot No. 24 in Tract 3959, and further described as 2807 Puritan Place, Anaheim, California
; end
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold e public headng et the City Hell in the Ciry of Maheim
on August 20~ 19fi2~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., noUce of sald public hearing heving been duly glvea es required
by Inw end in eccordance with the pcovlsione of tha Maheim Municipel Code, Chepter 18.68,to hear end considet
evidence fot end egeinst said proposed varience and ta investigate and meke findings and recommendetioas in connec-
Uon therewith; and •
WHEREAS, seid Commiesion, efter due inspection, investigatlon, and study made by itself and in its behelf,
end aftet due consldeeation of all evidenee and reports offered es seid hendng, does find end detecmlae the following
facte:
1. Thet the peclttoner requests e vadence fmm the Anaheim Municipel Code: Section 18.25v010 (1) to
complete an accessory building located 503 feet from the main buil~ing.
2. Thet thare aro exceptio^al or extreocdlnary circumetences or conditions eppllcable to the pmperty iavolved
or to the intended uee of the property thet do not epply genorelly to the pmperty or cless of use in the aeme viciaity
end zone.
3. That the requested varience is na.essary for the pceservation and enJoyment of e eubstenUal property dght
posseased by other property in the snme ~i~~iry end zone, end denied to the ptoperty in queatlon.
4. That the iequested vec3ence will not be materialiy detrimentel to the public welfere oc injurioue to ffie pmp~
erty or impmvewente in such vicinity end zone in which the property l,e loceted,
' S. Thet the requeatai veriance Nill not edveroaly aEfect the Compreheasive Generel Plea.
6. That no one appeared in apposition to subject petition. ~
,
ii
;~
Vl-G -1-
f
# ~'
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT~SOLVED that the Aneheim Lity Planning~,~ommission does hereby gran~t subject
~ Petition for Verience, upon the following conditions which are heceby found to be a necessery pcerequisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject propecty ia o:der to preserve the safety and genecal welfare of the Citiaens of the City of
Aaaheim.
1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Noso 1 and 2e
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me this 20th day of August~ 19b2o
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ~
AT'Y'EST:
G~c~-~./ ~~u...~.~.~-~ . '
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
i
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ' ~ ;~r
COUNTY OF ORA,vGE ) ss. ~
CTfY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs, Secretery of 4he City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify that the foce- ~`
going cesolui:an was passed mnd adopted at a meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
August 20~ 1902~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Marcoux9 Mungall, Pebley, Perry. ~
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Nonea ~
AHSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Hapgoodo '
IN WITNESS WFiEREOF, I have he~eunto set my hend this 20th da'y of August~ 1962.
~i~~ ~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. 459
V2-G -2- '
~
3
. _ __ _-_-._...---~ - --- -- ------ - __------ - - ---,--~--- _..T , - --__. ___ _..__. . ------. ~
a
.. ~ ~ ~_ •i