PC 1962-1963-465. ,,., ,_
.
._ ... ,._ _..
.,~~_,... _.--.____.-_~_________.__.... ~,...~.._._.__._._.,.~___._.__.__.... _
,.;~~,n, -._ . ___..
~~~
~,;, ~ (_} ~
'~ RESOLUTION N0. 465, SERIES 1962-63
`~<-.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITIOI3 FOR CONbITIONAL USE PERMIT 289 BE GRANTED
WHI~REAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim did eeceive a verified Patition for Conditional
Use Permit f~om HERMAN. FBEESE, 2143.,West, Bxead~uay., Anaheim,. Calif.ornia, Owner; DAVID W. 1~OK,
16Q9 North Bush, Santa Ana, California, Agent of certain real property situated.in.the City
of Anaheim, Caunty of.Orange, State..of California~ Rancho San Juan Ca~on de Santa Ana, the
Westerly.815 feet..of the.Northerly b93.feet .of the..Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter
of Section 17q Township.4 South, Range IO West~ S, B. B. & M> Excepting therefrom the Westerly
102,5 feet of. the.No.rtherly 425 feete Also excepting .theref.rom the Easterly 9 feet of the
Westerly 111.5 feet of the Southerly 18 feet of the Northerly 148 feeto Also excepting the
Northerly 66.00 feet
; and
WHEREAS, the Ci4y Planning Commissiop did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Aneheim on
August 20~ 1962, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public heering having been duly given as requered by
lew end in accordance with the provisions of the Meheim Municipel code, Chapter 18.64, to hear and considez evidence
for end ageinst said peoposed conditionel use and to investigate and meke findings and recommendations in connection
therewith; and .
WHEREAS, said Commission, efter due inspection, investigation, and study'made by itself end in its behalf, and
after due consideration of all evidence end reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. Thet the proposed use is pcoperly one for which a Conditional,Use Permit is authorized by this Code, to
wit: establish a medical-professional developmento
2. That the pcoposed ;de will not adveesely affect the adjoining lend uses end the growth and development of
the area in which it is proposed to be loceted.
3. That the size and shape of the site propoaed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the
pcoposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particulet acea nor to the peace, heelth, sofety, and gen~ral weifere
of the ~itizens of the City of Meheim.
4. That the gcanting of We CondItionel iJse Permit under the conditions imposed, if eny, will not he detximental
to the peace, health, sefery, and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Aneheim.
5. That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue hurden upon
the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the areae
6. That two persons appeared in opposition to sub~ect petitiono
Cl-G _l.
„ :.f:
~ • ( ~[ _
• ~ 'S~ S
~~ '•NOWy THEREFdFtE~ BETf'R~SOLYF~ that ~he Anahei.m City Plann~ng Commission does-hereby-grant a~
subjECt Petition.for.Conditional Use PErmit,.upon.tha following conditions which are hereby
,found to be a.necessaxy prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject proper.ty in order to pre- ~
serve th2 safety.and general welfaxe of the Citizens of the City nf.Anaheima
1. Preparation of street impr.ovement plans and installation of all improvements for Lincoln
Avenue, subject to.the approval of the City Engineer, and in accordance with the adopted standard
plans on f.ile in the.aff ice of .the City Engineere
2. Payment of $2000 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Lincoln Avenue.
3, Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works,
Sanitation Division, prior to Final Auilding Inspection.
4. Provision of a modified cul-de-sac at the terminus of Embassy Street subject to the approval
of the City Engineer. .Engineering to be prcvided by the City and canstruction by the developer. I
5. Installation of f ire hydrants, as determined to be necessary by the City of Anaheim Fire
Department, to provide adequate f ire protectiono
6. Access drives shall be a minimum of tv:enty-one (21) feet in width with adequate angle cut-
offs provided, or a minimum of twenty-eight (28) feet in width if no cutoffs are provided, and in ~
all cases, shall have a minimum vertical clearance oi fourteen (~14) feet~
7. Provision of a three (3) foot public utility easement and a two (2) foot overhang easement ~
along the easterly boundary of the subject property to adequately serve the sub3ect property
and other properties, at the time of the installation of the service facilitiesa
8. Provision of a three (~3) foot overhang easement along t~ie southerly and westerly boundary
of the sub3ect property to adequately serve the subject property and other properties, at the
time of the installation of the service facilities..
9. Provisions for handling the.drainage from the east to an existing street in a mannQr which '
as satisfactory to the City Engineer•. {
10. Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Item Nos. 1, 2,
and 4.
11. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit No. 1, provided that any development
proposed for subject property shall be subject to Architectural Committee approval prior to
issuance of a Building Permito
12e .Provision of a thirty-five (35) foot b~iilding setback from the~ Lincoln Avenue riqht-of-way
line, abtitting subje~t p~ o~erty, together with the provision of.a minimtim six {6) foot strip of ~
larrciscapinq abutting said right-of-way line, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and sub-'
jeci• to the approval of +he Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, and said landscaning to be in- ~
stalled prior to Final Building Inspectiono '
13.Construction of a six foot masonry wall on the south and west sides ~f subject property adjacent`
to the single family development and dedication of access r3ghts to Embassy Street prior to Final ?
Building Inspectiono .: :
14d That all structures sIiall t~e constructed no cYoser than fifteen feet fTOm tFie abutting single ~
fiamilu•~d'evelopfientSy and that an eight,foot strip of land~caping be provided where sub7ect property;
abats property developed foi single family residencesa ~
75':~~~That the proposed professional.huilding ~e of single story construction, and that the entire ~
development be limited to medical and professional aff ice uses onlyo ~
16. That prior to development of the southerly portion of subject property, the petitioner must `
epply for an additional Conditional,Use Permit for hearing~ and that complete plot plans be sub-
mitted at the time said application i''s~ made: '~
THE FOREGOING RE,,OLUTION is signed and approved by me this 20th day of August, 1962. ~
ATTEST: CHFiIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING OOMMISSION
Li~~,+~~Q"~`~`~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLAN[3ING flOMfiM1ISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1
OOUNTY OF ORANGE )ss,
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the ~ity Flanning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution ~nras_~assed and.adopted at a meeting of the City Planning
Cortmiission of the City nf Anaheim, held on August 20, 1962, at 2i00 o'clock P.M., by the follow-
ing vote of the members thereofs
AYES: COMMISSIONERSs.Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Marcoux, Mungall, Pebley, Perry.
NOESt OOMN{ISSIONERSt None.
ABSENTs ODMMISSIONERS~ Allred, Hapgood.
IN WITNESS WHERBDF~ I have hereunto set my hand this 20th day of August, 19620
- -A /~
UC~/
RFSOLllTION N0. 465 S CRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING G~DMMISSION
C2-G -2-