PC 1962-1963-520• ^ ~,
i _)
j .
RESOLUTY~N NO. 520, SERIES 1962-63
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CYTY OF r1NAHEIM
REPET~ITIOIdFOR RECLASSIF AT ON NO.F6~~~~Y 0 BE APPRO EI? T
WHEREAS, the City Pleaning Commissioa of the CIty of MeheHm did receive a vedfied Pe4ition fot Rcclasei$ce- ;
tionfram S. D: VANDRUFF, 2973 West Rome, Anaheim, California, Qwner; ROBERT L. BALEN, 921
YYest 17th Si:reet, Santa Ana, California, Agent of certain real property situated in the ,
City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as described in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and referred to herein as though set forth in full '
; and
WEiEREAS, the City Planning Commisaion did hold a public headng e4 the City Hell ia the City of Aas~heim on
October 29, 1962, at 2:00 o'clock P.M. .no4ice of seid public headng havieg beea duly given ea requiced •by
law end in accotdance with the pmvisiana of the Anahelm Municipel Code, Cheptee 18.72. to heai aad consider evideace
fo~ aad against seid ptoposed reclassi$cetion ead to is-vestigete end meke 8ndings ead recommeadatione in cottaectioa
the:ewith; and .
WHEREAS, seid Commiselon, after due inspection, iavestigetion, end study made by itself en~ in its behelf, end
aRec due ooasidecation of all evidrnce ead repocts ofEeted at seid hearing, does find ead detem~ine ffie followiag facts:
1. Thet the petitioner proposes a mclesslficetion of the ebove desctibed propeety from the C-1~ Neighbor•-
hood Commercial, Zone and ~t-A, Residential Agricultural, Zone to the R-3, Multiple Family
Zone to construct a deluxe planned-unit development. .
2. That the pmposed reclassificetion of aubject property is n~cessary and/or deairable for the ordetly end pro-
per development of the community.
3. That the propoaed reclassificetion of subject proRetty doea properly tolete •to the zones end their peimitted
nses locally established in close p:oximity to subject property and to the aones end their permitted uses generally esteb-
lished thmughout 4he community.
4. That the proposed.reclassif ication of subject property does not require dedication
for and standard improvement of abutting streets because said property does relate to
and abut upon streets and highways which are proposed to carry the type and quantity
of traffic, which will be generated by the permi~ted uses, in accordance with the
circulation element of the General Plan.
5. That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition.
Rl-A '1'
~ '
~ ~
~
' ~
-.. ..._.. ' :~
_ ____. _ ,
~ 3
,Ss--_ _ .._ ~
~
\ . 1~ . ~ - -
4•1'~ V~-i /t.. .•'..`'.,
~ ~ .'._, : titi 4`+~Sri%.~.`~i=•:
~ ~~~~;~t~:'-='
---- ~ /~ G.z -G ~ - ~ H
; ':.~ ;
/ ~A~ ~ V J
~'--a 8 p Coccn~jr ~stle Company
MAIN BTaEET AT FIFTH, lIINTII IINR, CALIFORtlIII • KIMbERL~ i-o'r:3
~~T'~Q~ ~~~)-p-1 ~f~)~
t 1
L . ry. ~ ~. L.i ~
Ali tl~a4 ~ertafta land eituatecl ~ru tha 5~4e ot Cal~t'orni,a. C~nty
ot Orange. Ci4y of Anagoi~, de~cribmd na fo4l~vos ~
' ~Par~el l. ~he West 3 acre~ of She Eamt ix.~l€ ot 41~e South halt oi -
t~o Southweat quartsr ot t~o Sauthwect quar3as oi Sectian 130
„ M Tawn~bt~ 4 South. Range 11 Weot~ in the R~acho Y~os Coyacmo, a~
~, A olaowa on a map roaorded in book 51. page 7 of Mi~collan~oua Mapo.
seeord~ of Orange County, CalffornSa.
ESceeptinQ th~refrom tho S~uth 303.00 feet. ;
'' Parcel Z. Ti~e ~a~t 3~cxe~r of !he Soutt~west quaster of the
Soutirn~ie~t quartes oi the Southcve~t quarter o8 Smctiomm 1~. Town~Wp 4
South~ Rang~ 31 Wee4~ !n tho Rancho Y~or Coy~stoeo ~-o ~hown on a~ map '
aecord~d in book 61, pa~e 7 ot Ml~cellaneou~ Mapr, record~ oi Oran~s
Cmunty. CaLiforaia. i
Excepting thmreirom the South 303.00 feet.
~~--Parcel 3. The North Z3S. S2 feet ot 4hat portion of Lhe Soutla half
of !he Southwoat quart~sz ot th0 Sov~4hv~rest quarte~ of Sectlon 13~
Towaehip 4 South, Range 11 We~t, At~ the Raneha Loo Coyote~, a~~ ehown
oa a map recorded ~n book 51, page 11 oi NiecellaneouA Mape~ rocord~
of Orang~ County~ Califoraia. lyin~ 1~eoterly of the following deocribed
li~e:
u
~ b B~ginning at a point in the South line oi eafd Section 13. eaid polat iteSna
located 464.20 feot Ea~texly of the Southweat acs: w,r of said Section 13~
tlsenco Noath 660.18 foet alomg a liae pa ra1Le3 to ttis W~ o¢ Yise of eaid
Sectioa 13, 4o a pofat is ths North line ot tixe S~ro~th half of tho Soutfd~ws~t ~
qvartsr of !he Southweei qnart~r of sa~d Sastio~ !~.
~~ ~ ~ BSscogting thsroiram the We~t 3Q9.00 ieet.
~
`' ~ Pard~Y 4. The So~eth 176. q 1 feet o!' ttio Nsrtharest qaarter ot tire
6outhweet qwr:mr of t!~ Sout~we~t qaaat.r ot 8~~4loa 13~ Towuohlp 4
~?; So~ath. ltan~a 11 Wos., ~. B. H. k M.
`~y ~c~epting W~a~fsom tQ~r ~Gs~t 3~l.9A foot.
~-;
;~ . 1;
,_, ~
~, . .
`---------- ---- - .. 1
~, _> _ `_.,"` -.
~
r,
y'
j,
i
\.
^ • ! i ~
NOW, THEREPDRE~ BE IT RESOLVID that the Aneheim City Planning Commission hereby recommends
to the City Cbuncil of the City of Anaheim that Petition for Reclassif ication No. 62-63-36 be
approved and, by so doing, that Title 18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to
exclude the above described property from the C-1, Neighborhood Co~mnercial, Zone, and R-A,
Residential Agricultural, Zone and to incorporate said described property in the R-3, Multiple
Family Residential, Zone, upon the fol:owing conditions which are hereby found to be a ~
necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the sub~ect property in order to preserve the
safety and general welfare of the Citizens of Anaheimt
1. P~yment of a Park ~nd Recreation Fee of $25.~0 per dwelling unit to be collected as part
of the Suilding Permit.
2. Prov;sion of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works, ~
Sanitation Division, ~rior to F.inal Building Inspection.
3, Installatfon of fire hydrants, as determined to be necessary by the City of Anaheim Fire
Department, to provide adequate fire.pratection.
4. Sub~ect.to.the.approval of.Petition.for Conditional Dse Permit No. 314.
5. Provision of a modified cul-de-sac on Eldorado Street subject to the approval of the City
Engineer.,..prior.to Final Building Inspection.
6. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 through 7, with the exception
that covered parking spaces be 'increased to a minimum of ninety (90) as required by the Anaheim
Municipal Code. •
7. That the access.drives ad3acent to, but outside of sub3ect property along the south proper-°
ty line and along the east property line be paved as indicated on the Plot Plans, prior to Final
Building Inspection.
8. Provision of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the east and north boundaries of sub3ect
property where safd property abuts single family residences, .the height of said wall to be mea-
sured from the f inished grad's of the R-1 property.
THE FORIDOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 29th day of October, 1962.
t/tih.~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CO ON
ATTEST~ ~
. !
SECREfARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING ODMMISSION
STATE OF CALIF~DRNIA )
(AUM'Y OF ORANGE )ss
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do
herehy certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the
City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on October 29, 1962, at 2t00 o'clock
P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof~
AYESe ~MMISSIONERSe Allred, Camp, C}ievos, Gauer, Marcaux, Mungall, Pebley.
NQESa WMMISSIONERSt None.
ABSENTt QOb1MIS5I0NERSt Hapgood, PeTry.
IN WITNESS YVHERIDF, I have hereuntn set my hand this 29th day of October, 1962.