PC 1962-1963-523~
;
..;. .. ...._ .,._
.~
;
c .~
. ( ,`, `_~
RESOLUTION NO. 523, SERIES 1962-63
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THg CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-124 gE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a vedfied Petition for Reclasai~ce-
tion from JAMES 1~ID .MARY. ~LICE ALLEN~ ..95b2 Harvest I.ane,. Anaheim, Califoxnia, Owners; FRANK
TORLEY or HIZL K15GEN, 96b2.HarvESt Zane, Anahaim~ California, Agents o~ certain'xeal prop-
erty situated in the Cit~ of Anahe3m, County of Orange, State of California, described as:
The Easter.ly 100 feet of the North half of the West half of the North half of the Northwest
quarter of the Northwest quar.ter of Section 24, .in Township 4 South, Range 11 West, in the
Rancho Los Coyotes, as shown on a Map recorded in Book 51, page 11 of Miscellaneous Maps,
records of Orange County, California
; end
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold e public headne at the City Hall in the City of Meheim on
November 14~ 1962~ , et 2;00 o'clock P.M. notice of aaid public headng havin6 been du;y givmt ae required •by
law and in accordance with the provisions of the Maheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.72, to heni end coneider evidence
for and against seid ptoposed reclassification and to investi6ate and meke findin6s end racommend~tions in connection
thecewith; end .
WHEREAS, aaid Commission, efter due inapection, investigation, and study made by itself ond in its behalf, end
after due rnnsideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearinQ, doea find and determine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes a reclassification of the above described pmpecty from the R-A~ Residential
Agricultural, Zone to the k-3, iNultiple Family Residential, Zone to construct a two-story
multiple family residential development.
2. Thet the proposed :eclessification of subject property is necessary and/or desireble for the orderly and pro-
per development of the community.
3. That the proposed reclessillcetion of snbject property does pmpes!y relate to the zones and their permitted
uses locelly estabiished in close proximily to subject propedy end to the zones and their permitted uses generelly esteb-
lished throughout the community.
' 4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does require dedication for
and standard improvement of abutting streets because said property does relate to and abut
upon streets and highways which are proposed to carry the type and quantity of traffic,
which will be generated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation element
of the General Plan.~
5. That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition.
. ~
Rl-A
i
4
i
_- ~; ~~
-1-
~
•' • ,__i ~ ~ .
`~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RE50LVED that the Anaheim City Plenning Commfseion does hereby recommend /~ /
to the City Councii of the City of Aneheim that aubJect Petltion for RecleeaiHcetioa be appmved and, by eo doing; •
thet Title 1&Zoning of the Aneheim Municipal Code be emended to exclude` the ebave described propeety from the
R-A9 Residential Agricultural, Zone, and to incorporate saici described property in to the
R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone upon the following conditions which are her~by found
to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the sub3ect property in order to pre-
serve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anahein.
1. Dedication of fifty-three (53) feet from the monumented centerline of Ball Road
(30 feet existing).
2. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improvements for
Ball Road subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted
standard plans on file in the Off ice of the City Engineer.
3. Payment of $2000 per front foot far street lighting purposes on Ball Road.
4. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be collected as
part of the Building Permit.
5. Provi~ion of trash storage areas as determined by the Aepartment of Public Works,
Senitation Division, which are adequate in size, accessible to trash-truck pickup and
adequately enclosod by a solid fence or wall prior to Final Building Inspection.
6o Instellation of fire hydrants, as determined to be necessary by the City of Anaheim
Fire Department, to provide adequate fire protection priar ta Final Building Inspection.
7. Time limitation af one hundred and eighty (160) days for the accomplishment ef~ Item
Nos. 1, 2, and 3. ~~
8. Development substantially in accordance with Revision No. lt Exhibit Nos. 1~ 2, 3,
4, and 5.
9. Subject to the approval of Variance No. 1525.
THE FOREGOIlVG RESOLUTION is aigned and epproved by me this 14th day of November, 1962.
ATTEST:
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIIIG C,0 _,
SE~RETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY CF OR~NGE ) as.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs ~ Secretery of the City Pleaning ~Commiasion of the City of Anoheim, do hMeby certify that the fo~e-
going resolution wes pessed end adopted et e meeting of the City Plenning Commisaion of'the City of Aneheim, hefd on
November 14, 1962, , et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by tha following vote of the members theceof:
AYESr COhII~ISSI0NER5: Camp, Chavos, GatrBr, Marcoux, Mungall, Pebley' Perry.
NOES: CO~IMISSIONEPS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Hapgood.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have heteunto set my hend this 14th day of NoVember~ 1962.
%~S~~~C.G~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ~
RESOLUTION N0.523
R2-A
;~s
_~
----,-...__._... ___.. __..___.._ . _.__ ___ ._.__...__.
~