PC 1962-1963-550:J .
~
~`~;.:..____. ~_,_ _ -~~_
5 .
~+,y' ,~,1'`'~' ~ ~ .
~~' ~ RESQLUI.~N NO. 550y SERIES 1962-63 ~,~
~
~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNIIQG COMMISSION OFT~ CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 02~ BE DENIED
WEI~REAS, the City Plann?ng Commission of the City of Meheim did eeceive a vedHed Petltion for Conditioaal.
Use Permit from ?ARSo ARI'HUR Eo H~]N~IERLINGy et al, 114Coffman Street, Anaheim, California, Ownor;
LIAYD E. MJUM"y 600 North £~;>;lid Avenue, Suite 609y Anahe3m, California, Agent of certain
real property situated in +he City of Anahe3~ County of Orange, State of California, described
as follovirst The East one-half of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section
17~ in Township 4 Southy Range 10 West, partly in the Rancho San Juan Ca~on de Santa Ana
and partly in the Rancho Los Coyotes, as shorm on a map thereof recorded in kiook 51, page 10,
Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange,County ~
: ; ead
WHEREAS, the City Flenning Commission did hold a public headng at the City Hell in the City of Aneheim on
Novetnber 26~ 1962, et ~:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public headng having bee~t duly givan as requiced by
law aad i'n accordence with the pmvieions ot the Aneheim Municipel Code, Chepter 18~64, to hear end coneidee ovidence
for and ageinet said proposed condiUonel use aa3 to inveatigete and meke fi~zfng~ end recommendetioasin conaection
thecewith; end ~
WHEREAS, eaid Commiaslon, eftar due inspaction, investigation, and etudy mede by iteelf and in its behelf;
end after due coneideretion of ell evidence and repods offeeed at seid hearing, doea iind end determine the followL~g focte:
1. That the ptopoaed uee ie pioperly one foe which a Conditional Uee Permit ie authori,~ed by thin Code, to wit:
5ection 180640020 (1-e) to pex~mit the establishment of a three-si:or~y planned-unit hotel-apart-
ment development with carports; and Section 16o64v020 (3-p) to construct two twenty-story
offico buildings 3n con~unction with the ultimate development of a planned-unit shopping
cente~< A requested amendment of G1 (see staff report) -----purpoaes, i's under the
~urisdiction of the Counail and thereforep nov properly bafore the Commiasion.
2a That the proposed use w3ll adversely atfect the ad~oining land uses and the
growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be loca'tedo
3e That a Resolution o: Intent for C-1, Neighvoxhood Commercial, Zoning prohibiting any
residential use9 is ,pending on sub,jeGt property9 that sub~ect propasty ehould be maintained
for commerciet developmenta ~
4q That a letter signed by five (5) persons was':received in oppos'i,tion to eub~ect
petitiono . . •
~. _
-
„~ i'. ._..~ i :: ~
i
-
.
. ~7A;,. ~~ A . ~
~I. ' ~• ~ "~ .
~ A`
~ t'
\ ' I
~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Aneheim City Planning Commiesion doea heteby deny eubJact
Petition for Conditional Use Permit on the basis of the eforementioned findinge. .
THE FOREG0ING RESOLUTION ie eigned end approved by me this 26th day of November~ 1962,
i
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISS
ATTEST:
~--~_, ,
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLtiNN1NG COMMISSION '
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ec.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs~ ;ecretary of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certi£y that the fore-
go~mg reaolution wes pessed end adopted et a meeting of the City Plenning Commies3on of the Ciry of qneheim, held on '-'
November 26~ I962~, at 2:00 o'cloclc P.M., by the following vote of the membera thereoE:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred9 ~am~~ r'aavos, Gauer, Marcoux, Nhmgail~ Pebley, Perry.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None9 -
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Hapgood< '~
~ ~
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve he:eunto set my hend thia 26th day of November~ 1962. ~
:,
. j
, ,a
~
-- ~
~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMIS3ION 3
RESOLUTION N0. 550
C2-D -~
___~..__ . _- - _ _«, ~.-.~____._. ...- . ''~ ,
~~