PC 1962-1963-594, ____ _ __--_ ___ _____.._ _ _.`. _._.._. __...__._ ___ _ . . _
,,._ _ ____-_ _.... . .
, _
s" ~ ~ .
5' ~J ~ ~~r~~
f • . . ~ ~t
i RESOLUTION N0. 594, SERIES 1962-63
~. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY FLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITIOI~ FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.344_ gE DENIED
1. ~
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Conditianal
Use Per.nit from ELVEE~ INC., 200 West Midway Dr3ve, Maheim, California, Ownersy L. V. BOSIWICK,
200 West Midway Dr.ive, Anaheim, .California,. Agent of cextain.real pxoperty situated in the
City of Anaheim, County.of Orange, State.of California described as Lot No. 26 in Block 1
t of Tract No. 419, as shown on a Map reco~ded in Book 16, page 2 of Miscellaneous Maps,
records of Orange County, California
=i!
:~
`' ~
iij
;,~ , and
WHEF.E~:S, the City Planning Commission did hold e public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Aneheim on
January 7~ 1963~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public heering having beep duly given es required by
law and ia accocslance with the provisions of the Maheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18:64, to hear and consider evidence
i;~' for and against said proposed conditional use and' to investigete and make findings and recommendations in connection
!'~ the~ewith; and
WHEREAS, seid Commission, after due inspection, investigetion, end study mede by' itself and in its behelf,
;•~ and aEter due consideration of ell evidence and seports offered et seid hearing, does find end determine the following fads: ~
i~ 1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a Conditionel Use Permit is authorized by this Code, to wit:
'i establish a trailer park facility on subject property.
;~ 2. That the proposed use will adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the
1 growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located.
~ 3. That subject property was classified into the M-1, Light Manufacturing Zone
`.~ under Reclassification No. 61-62-37, on the assumption that the tier of lots, of which sub-
I ject property is a part, could be developed for industrial use as presently exists on the
abutting properties to the east and on three parcels to the south of subject property, and
that Zeyn Street would be the dividing line between the industrial and residential development.`~
4. That one person appeared and one letter was recei~ed in opposition to subject
petition.
!~ •
,;.i
;~
:~
`~
'1
~i
;j
;,
:.,
:~;,
.;1 ~
~,
:;
>~
.;
.; .
,~
,
;;{
;,~ . ~
~~ ~
;J ~
_. Cl-D _l.
i
i
~
;
I
_. ~ ---~--..._ __ __ .~. __._..______- ~__..,..... cyl
-~ -- x"'M`~".},i ' ~ __. _
t'
~ 4
i,
~
f- • ~
~.
~,,,:,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Maheim City Planning Commission does Itereby deny subJect
Petition for Conditionel Use Pernut on the basis of the aforementioned flndIngs.
TSE FOREGOING icc~:~LUTION is signed end epproved by me.this 7th day Of January~ 1963.
~----.
~---= "l"/
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISS
i,
ATTEST:
i J
SECRETARY ANAHEAN CITY PLANN'ING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM } •
I~ Ann Krebs~ Secretary of the City Pxertning Commission of the City of Meheim, do hereby cedi£y that the fore-
going resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Plenning Commission ofthe City of Anaheim, held on
January 7~ 1963~ , at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members theceof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Mungall, Pebley, Perry.
NOES: COMA9ISSIONERS: None.
ABSTAIN: O~N~~SSIONERSs Marcoux.
~ABSENT: C SSIONERS: Hapgood.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set ~ny hend th3s 7th day of Januaryi 1963.
RESOLUTION NO. 594
C2-D
i~ ___
~ r.
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
_~