PC 1962-1963-598~~ ~~
RESOLUTION NO.a98< SERIES 1962-63
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNPdG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OI' ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDIIJG TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-55 HE APPROVED
WF3EREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive e vedfied Petition for Reclesaifica-
tionfrom ROBERT.L. WETZLERy 929 Spring Street, A~eim, California, Owner of certain.real
property situated in the C3ty of Anaheir~~, County of Orange, State of Ca13.fornia described ae
thp 1Nest 165 feet of the•East 265 feet af the.Nnrth one-half of the West one-half of the
North one-half of~the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 24, Township 4
South, Range 11 West, in the Rancho Los Coyotes, as per map recorded in Book 51, Page 11 of
Miscellarteou"s Maps, in the office of the county recorder of said county .
; end
WHE;REAS, the City Plenning Comadssion did hold e public hearing et the City Hell ia the City of Anaheim on
January 7~ 1963' et 2:C0 o'clock P.M. notice of said Public hearing having been duly given es required •by
law end in accordence with the provisiona of the Meheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.72, to heai and conaider evidence
for end egainst said ptoposed reclassificetion end to investigate attd make findings end recommeadetiona in connection
therewith; aad
WHEREAS, aeid Commission, after due inspection, investigation, ead atudy mede by itself end in iQe behalf, and
efter due consideration of all evidmce and reporta ofEered at seid hearing, does find and datecmine the following.fects:
1. Thet the ~~etitioner p:opoaes a reclasaification of the above descdbed property from the R-A. Residential
Agricultural, Zone to the C-1, Ne3ghborhood Commercial, Zone to permit the developm2nt of
a nei.ghborhood shopping, center on subject propertyo
2. That the praposed reclasaificetion of subject property is neceasary and/or desireble for the orderly end pto-
per development of the community. '
3. That the psaposed reclassificaUon-of subject property does properly relete to the zones and their peanitted
uses locally establiahed in elose proximity to subject pcoperty end to the zones and their permitted usen generally eatab-
lished thcoughaut the commuaity.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does require dedication
for and standard imprdvement of abutting streets because said property does relate to
and abut upon streets .and highways which are proposed to carry the type and quantity of
traffic~ which will be generated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation
element of the General Plan.
5. That no one appeared in ~opposition to subject petitiona
Rl-A .1_
- ---•-,--..___..__
..~ - .~ra ,
~ ~V ~ ~~~ ~~
N01V, THEREFORE, F3E IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Plenning Commission daes hereby ~ecommend
to the City Council of the City of Maheim that subject Petition for Recleasil~icetion be appcoved aad, by so doing,
thet Title 1&Zoning of the Aneheim Municipal Code be amended to eaclud~ J~e ebove desedbed propeety from the
R-A; Res.idential. Agxic"it'~!*a~-. Znne.and~o .inC~Trate_ :~irl _d~scrihe.d.~r.operty...in .the G1,
Neighborhood Commexcial,. Zone .upon .the fnllowing conditions which ar.e hereby found to be a
necFSSary prerequisite to the proposed use of subjer.± ,:~operty 3.n order to preserve the safety
and general welfare of the Citizens of the City oi Anah~:im.
1.. Dedication of fifty-three (53) feet from Liie monume~,ted centerline of Ball
Road (30 feet existing).
2. .Freparation of stxeet..improvement plans ai~a installation of all improvements
for Ball Road, .subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the
adopted standar~i..pl~ns..on f3le.in the office of the City Engineer.
3. Payment of $2000 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Ball Road.
4. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Department of
Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection.
5. Instal3.ation of fire hydrants, as determined to be necessary by the City of
Anaheim Fire Department to provide adequate fire protection.
6. Time Iimitation of one hundred and eighty (180) davs for the accomplishment of
Item Nose 1, 2, and 3.
7. Development substantialLy in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2 as amended
herein.
8o Installation of a six (6) foot strip of landscaping on the Ball Road property line
of subject property, prior to Final Building Inspection.
9. Installation of tree wells at forty (40) foot intervals in the parkway portion of
the Ball Road right-of-way abutting subject property, and said landscaping to be installed
prior to Final Building Inspectiono •
10. Construction of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the seuth and east boundaries
of subject property, prior to Pinal Building Inspection. . '
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me this 7th day of January~ 1963.
CHAII2MAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COINMISSf
ATTEST: •
- `!L~i~~~/Y~/ %~~''s ""
.~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMb'RSSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY CF OR~INGE ) ss.
C1TY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs ~ Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aaaheim, do hereby cettify thet the forz-
going resolution was pessed and adopted et a meeting of the City Plenning Cammission ofthe City of Anaheim, held on
January 7~ 1963~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof;
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Marcoux, Mungall, Pebley, Perry.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Noneo
ABSENT: COMMISSdONERS: Hapgood. .
IIV WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereuato set my hand Uus 7th day of JanuBry~ 1463.
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNINQ COlI~M13Si0N
RESOLUTION NO. 598
R2-A
-2-
_ ._._.. ._ ,..
3:: ~ .
~ , .~ M__..r ~
`_-' . ~°~ . ~1 . ~ , .