PC 1962-1963-645•,1
~ ~.~ ~?•~~~~ -I,
1 .-
....._t .. .......... . . .... . ._ .
~:
~
F
~ ,+.i
\ .~~ ~ ~
RESOLUTION NC. 64~~ ~ERIES 1962-63
A RESOLUTION OF THE ~;1TY PLAIvNING COMMISSIOPI OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE: CITX COUNCIL OF THE CIT~ OF AIdAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLA~SIFICATION N0. 62-63-73 gE APPROVED
~, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the Cd!y oE Anaheim d'ed recaive a verified Petition for 12eclassifica-
tion from MASAMI OGATA, 3030 'Nest Ball Roacis slnahe:m, California, Owrier of certain real
property situated in the City of Anaheim, County af Orat~ge„ St,ate of Californias described
as the ftorth half o£ the i4ortheast quar.ter of the tlortheast c3ua•r.ter of the Piortheast
quarter of Section 23,...Township..4 gQUth,.Range u~Q;~t~ ~-~b Rancho Los Coyotes, as shown
I on a map thereof recorded.in Book 51, page.ll, Miscel;aneous Fhaps, records of said Orange
County; EXCEPT the Westerly rectangular 250.38 feet ~;hereor, ALSO EXCEPT the East 265.00
feet thereof
/
1
r
{
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Aneheim on
February 18~ 1963~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of said public hearing having been duly g;ven as required by
law and in accordence with the provisions of the Anaheim Muaicipal Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear end consider evidence
for and against seid pioposed reclessification and to investi~ate end make findings and recommetsdetions in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, seid Commission, efter due insp~ption, investigation, und study made by itself end in its behalf, and
after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the foliowing facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes a ceclessification of the above described property from the R-A~ Residential
Agricu.ltural, Zone to the C-1, Neighborhood Commarcial, Zone to establish a medical, dental,
and professional office building on subject propertye
2. That the proposed reclassification of subject pcoperty is necessery and/or desirable for the orderly and pro-
per development of the community.
3. Thet the proposed ceclessification of subject propecty does properly relate to the zones and their permitted
uses locally established in close peoximity to subject p:operty and to the zones and their permitted uses generally estab-
lished throughout the community.
4o That the proposed reclassification of subject property does require dedication for
and standard improvement of abutting streets because said property does relate to and abut
upon streets and highways which are proposed to carry the type and quantixy of traffic, which
will be generated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation element of the
General Plano
5a That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition.
-1-
_. _..__..._-._ _ _.--__ --..
t =~ _
...1.__..._._. _.._.__..__. ...__............_.......__......_ .__...__._........_..._..._._.."_"".._ ...__...._.....__._.. .
t
~F . ,' ~ -~ ~ y~
~? ~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE I'I' RESOLVED thet the Aneheim City Pleaaing Commission does hereby recommend
to the City Couacil of the City of Anaheim thet subject Petition for 1?eclassificetion be epproved and, by so doing,
that Title 18-Zoning of the Aneheim Municipel Code be amended to exclude the ebove described property from the
,. R-Ay Residential Agricultural, Zone and to incorporate said said described property in the
; C-1, Neighborhood Commercial, Zone upon the following conditions which are hereby found to
i be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve
the safety and general weifare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
~ lo Dedication of fifty-three (53) feet from the monumented centerline of Ball Road
(50 feet existing)e
2o Preparation of street imporvement plans and installation of all improvements for
Ba11 Road, subject to the approval of the City Fngineer and in accordance with the adopted
standard plans on file in the office of the City ~ngineero
3o Payment of $2000 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Ball Roade
4o Provisior, of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Puk~.i:ic
Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection~
5o Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Item
Noso 19 2, and.3a
6~ Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Noso 1 and 20
7. Installation of tree wells at forty (40) foot inter•vals in the parkway portion of Ball
Road right••~of-way, said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the
Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, and said landscapir.g i;o be instailed prior to F3na1
Building ~:~speciiona •
i ~J THE FORGGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 18th day of February, 1963a
`~ e
:I
,~ ~
,
-I . CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
, RTTEST:
~~~~"'Z/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMNfISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY CF OR~INGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs ~ , Secretary a: the City Plenning Commission of the City of Meheim, do hereby ce
going resolution was pessed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City oi
February 18~ 1963~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the :oilowing vote of the membe:s thereof:
AYES: COhiMISSI0NIERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos,. Gauer9 Marcouxy Munga.ll
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Hapgood.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set ~ny hand t11^ 18th day of February~ 1963.
RESOLUTION NO. 645
(.~Z~~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING
-2-