Loading...
PC 1962-1963-646. ~ . ' _.' ~r ,. RESOLUTION N0. 646~ SERIES 1962-63 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITF OF ANAHEIM ! RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF6'~H~C~'4Y OF ANAHEIM THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. BE APPROVED WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Meheim did recelve a verified Petition for Reclessifica- tionf:om ~GER LOWELL OLSON, 2210 Loara, Anaheim, California, Owner; OSCAR AIKEN~ 8752 Gardeh Grove Boulevard, Garden Grove, California, Agent of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, 5tate of California, described as the North 120 feet of the South 554 feet of th2 West half of the West half of the Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 28, Township 4 South, Range 10 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the City of Anaheim and WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commissiort did hold e public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on February 18~ 1963, at 2:00 o'clock P.M, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as requited by iaw and in accacdence with the provisions of the Anaheim Muniaipal Code, Chepter 18.72, to hear and consider evidence for and against seid pioposed :eclassification and to investigate and make findings end cecommendations in connection therewith; end WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study mede by itself and in its behelf, and eEter due rnnsideration of all evidence and :eports offered at said heering, does find and determine the following fects: 1. That the petitioner proposes a reclassificetion of the above described property from the R-A~ Residential Agricultural, Zone to the R-3, Multipl.e Family Residential, Zone to establish a sixteen (16) unit one-story planned unit multiple family residential development on subject property. 2. That the proposed reclassificetion of subject property is necessary and/or desirable for the ocderly and pro- per development of the community. 3. That thE proposed reciassification of subject property does properly relate to the zones end their pennitted uses locally established in close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generelly esteb- lished throughout the community. 4. That the proposed reclassificai:ion of subject property does require dedication for and standard impro~iement of abuttinq streets because said property does relate to and abut upon streets and nighways which are proposed to carry the type and quant~ty of traffic, which will be generated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation element of • the General Plano 5o That subject property is located within an established area of multiple family residential development wliich is not reflected an the proposed General Plan because of its small sizee 6o That no one appeared in opposition to ,ubject petition. ~'~i } t ^.~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that lhe f-nae~im City Pleaning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council of the City of Anaheim thet subject Petition for Reclassi6cetion be approved and, by so doing, that Tifle 1&Zoaing of the Maheim Muaicipal Code be emended to exclude the ehove descdbed property from tne R-Ay Residential Agricultural, Zone and to incorporate said described property in the R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone upon.the.f.ollowing conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject property in order to Freserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheima lo Dedication of thirty-two (32) feet from the monumented centerline of Loara Street (20 feet existing)o 2e Preparation of sireet impror-ement plans and installation of all improvements for Loara Street, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the adopted standard alans on file in the office of the City Fngineero 3~ Payment of $2~00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Loara Streeto a~ Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25000 per dwelling unit to be ~ollected as part of ihe Building Permit~ 5~ Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Departme:7t of Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection~ 6a Subject to the approval of Petition for Conditional Use Permit Noe 3?i~ 7~ Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days fo:c the a ccomp'~.ishment of Item Nose 1, 29 and 3e 8o Developmeut substantially in accordance with Exhibit Noso 1 throvjn 5 as amended hereina 9a Submission of revised p~ans to the Planning Department for Devel:>pment Review prior to hearing of subject petition before the City Councilo 10, Provision that the interior walls of the proposed carports ~ha.ll be stuccoed, that enclosed storage cabinets shall be provided along the rear wall of each carport, and that adequate bumper guards shall be provided to protect the interior wall of the proposed carports from damage prior to Final ~,,:;ding Inspection. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 18th day of February, 19630 CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: l ~~ ~ ~~-1.~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY CF ORpNGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Meheim, do heraby certify thet the fore- going resolution wes pa~sed and edopted et a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on FebrUary 18, 1963, et 2:Q0 o'clock P.M., by the following vote oE the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Marcoux, Mungall, Pebley, Perrya NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Hapgood. IN l'JITNESS WHEREOF, I have heaeunto set my hand this 18th day of February~ 1963. ~; ~ ~ - ~/'/~ ivl./ %~~f'LQ~~fito/ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ;~ j RESOLL!TION NO. 646 ' R2-A _2_ , i ------ ._ ..___ _ _ . ~ __ _ _ _ ~ ~~_. ;:: ~ cr:~: ' r= - ~ ~ .