Loading...
PC 1962-1963-657\ f ~ ~ ~ RESOLUTION NO. 657, SERIES 1962-63 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REC034SENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT PETTTION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-80 BE DENIED WHEREAS, the City Plancing L'ommissioa of the City of Aneheim did ceceive a verified Petition for Reclassifica- tionfrom GIAQ~MA LUGARO, 532 North Magnolia, Maheim, California, Owner; VILLAGE GREEN G~MPANY, 600 North Euclid, Suite 645, Anaheim, California, Agent of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referred to herein as though set forth in full ; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hell in the City of Anaheim on February 18~ 1963, at 2:00 o'dock P.M., notice of seid public hearin~ having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Maheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.72,to hear and considerevi- dence for and against said pmposed reclessification and to investigate end make findings end recommendetions in connedion therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspec4ion, investigetion, and study made by itselE and in its behalf, and after due consideratioa of all evideace and repor[s offered at seid hearing, does fInd and determine the following fazts: 1. That the petitioner proposes a reclessification of the above described property from the R-A~ Residential Aqricultisal, Zone to the R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone to permit the establishment of a two-story planned unit multiple family residential development. 2. That commercial zoning was established on the Magnolia Street frontage after multiple ~ family development and neighborhood commercial zoning was denied, that the City Council on ~ July 5, 1960 approved Tentative Tract No. 3365 for single f amily development, and at the time the co~ercial zoning was approved, the City Council assured the single family develop- ment owners that vacant property abutting to the east of the commercial zoning would be developed for single family homes. 3. That the injection of residentiai development i~: excess of seven (7) dwelling units per net residential acre would be inconsistant with past land use policies for subject prop- erty. 4. That the subject parcel, by dimension~ would be ideally suited for a single family subdivision development. 5. That two persons, one of whoro represented the single family residents to the east of subject property appeared in opposition to subject petition. Rl-D -1- ~ -- i . ~ _ .. ~ , `..} i _-~ ;, ;~ .~i .~ :~ :~ ;, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Maheim City Plenning Commission does hereby recommend s°i to the City Council of the City of Aneheim that subject PeGtion for Reclassification be denied on the besis of the , ,i aforementioned findings. ~j ;f THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me this 18th day of February~ 1963. ,7 ;; ;,j ;i ;I CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMIS ATTEST: ' ij (%~~~~v1'~ tj SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ;.'~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) `~ I~ Ann Krebs ~ Secretary of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore- .~ going resolution wes passed ana adopted at e meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Maheim, held on :._j February 18~ 1963, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof: :~ AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Marcoux~ Niungall, Pebley, Perry. :'~ NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None. , ';j ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Hapgood. 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hand this 18th day of February~ 1963. ,, ~ ; j SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION i ~~;~,,,, RESOLUTION NOb57 . R2-D -Z-