PC 1962-1963-665,e-.
-~,:~ ii.,- ~•.J
RESOLUTION N0, 655~ SERIES 1962-63
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 1553 gE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petitioa for Varience
fcom CHARLES Ve AMADORy 2628 West 78th Street, Inglewood, California, Owner: BLAS MARAON~
741 North Pauline, Anaheim9 California, Agent of certain real praperty situated in the City
of Anaheim, .County of Orange, State of California, described as Lot No. 3 in the Anaheim
Fxtension Tract, and fu•rther described as the 1st lot east of 1527 East Sycamore Street,
Anaheim9 California.
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a publlc heering at the City Hell in the City of Aaaheim
on March 4~ 1963 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public heari~g heving been duly given as required
by law and in accordence ~,ith the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.63, to hear and coasidzT
evidence for and egainst said proposed veriance end to investigate and make findings and recommendaiions in conne^-
tion thecewith;•and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigetion, and study made by itself end in its behalf,
and after due consideration of all evidence end reports offered as said hearing, does find end deScrmine the £ollowing
facts:
1. Thet the petitioner re uests e variance from the Anaheim Pdunicipal Cade: Section 18 0 32 0 080 (3~, which
stipula'tes a twenty-five ~(25) foot rear yard requirement, Section 18~16e030 (4-b), which re-
quires that an R-A parcel he not less than one (1) acre in area, and Section 18a32.12i~ which
•requires gax•ages on subject propertyy to permit the construction of a single story multiple
family planned residential development on subject property with a nine (9) foot rear yard and
with carports„
2. That there are exceptionai or extraocdinary circumstences or conditions aopliceble to the property involved
or to the intended use of the property thet do not epply geneeally to the property or cless of use in the seme vicinity
and zone.
3. That the requested variance is neceasery for the preservatiort end enjoyment of a substentiel property right
possessed by other pcoperty in the seme vicinity and zone, end denied to the property in question.
4. That the requested varience will not be materielly detrimental to the public welfflre or injuriQUS to the prop-
erty or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the propeny is loceted.
5. That the cequested variance will not edversely affect the Comprehensive ~eneral Plen.
6o That no one appeared in opposition to s.abject petitiono
-1-
>~ vk
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject
Petition for Varienca, upon the following conditions which ace hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject pcoperty in order to preserve the sefety end genewl welfere of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim.
lo Subject to the xeclassification of subject property to the R-3, Multiple Family
Residentialq Zone.as appxoved and completed undes Reclassification No. 62-63-32.
2o Recordation of a Record of Sur~ey recording the approved division of subject property
as indicated on Fxhibit No. 1.
30 ?rovision that the rear and side walls of the propnsed carports shall be stuccoed,
that enclosed storage cabinets shall be provided at the rear wall of each carport, and that
adequate bumper guards shall be provided to protect the interior wall of the proposed car-
ports from damageo
THE FOREGGING RESOLUTION is signed end appmved by me thia 4th da of March~ 1963.
~
CHAIRMAN ANAHED4i CITY PLAN I G COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~p~~
S~CRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COYIMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ~
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM ) • '
I, Ann Krebsy Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby ceriify thet the fora
gaing resolution was pessed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission ofthe City of Aneheim, he?d on
March 4, 1963 et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the foilowing vote of the members thereof:
A1'ES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Craig, Gauer, Mungall, Pebley, Sides.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Noneo . .
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Pexryo ~
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend this 4th day of March~ 1963.
~,~~~G%t=~/~P/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSEON
RESOLUTION h0. 665
V2-G
-2-
~^
._... ...__ _.. . . __ ._ _ .._._~s._ ._....._ _._ ...._ ..
_..._ __....__.
i~
~
~-__,___ _-- - ----•- ---