PC 1962-1963-706o: •
'
~~~~; ~ ~ .~~`~ ! f ~ -
. ,~ I ~
f
~
} .. -• r• ~~ ~
' ' 3
iC
~
RESOLUTION N0. ~~~, S~RIBS 196 -63
;t
,,I
A RESOLUTION OF THF, CITY PLANNING COA7MISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CI'lY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
~ PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 62~63-93 BE DENIED
~
,i
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commissicn o: t4o CF'v c> .~ineheim did receive a verified Petition for Recla'ssifice-
~ tion from avArr J, mnd i~;A L. SCOTT, 14?. 1'hirteenth Street, Seal Beach, California, Owners;
TDM B. I.~'WI3 and/or MORRI BiTKSR, 220 ~ast Z"t'r, $treet, Costa Mesa, California, pgents of
~~ certain real propertq situated in the City of Rnaheim, County of Orange, State of California ~
as described in Bxhib±t "A" attr:ched hereto and referred to herein as though set forth in
full ~
• ; and
WHEREAS, the Ciry Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
April 1, 1963 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required
by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Meheim Municipal Code, Chapter 1$.72,to hear and consider evi-
dence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make findings and recommendetions in
connection therewith: and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study mede by itself and in its behelf,
and efter due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following
facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes a reclassification of the ahove described property f:om the R-k, Residential
Agricultural, Zone te ~the R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone to permit the establishment
of an 18-unit apa•rtment b•~ilding~
2,. That the proposed rec'lassification of.subject property is not necessary and~or
desirable for the o.rderly and proper development of the community.
3~ That the petitioner proposes the establishmer.t of an overcrowded living environmenta
4,. That the p•roposed development would be incompatible to the existing uses, and would
be detrimental •to the highest and best possible land use development of property adjacent
and in close proximTty to subject pz•operty~
5. That two (2) persons appeared, one of whom represented four (4) property owners,
in opposition to subject petitiono ~
Rl-D -1-
~_ ---~---- ---_ .. ....____ _ ______----------- - - _
_ ,
_ -, .- . - _ ~t ~ ~----
, ',
. PdlfrA•fl f3~v. 6.59) ~ T ' `' --~r~ . .
:~~.~c ~~ ~'L T~.J~~ i~ 3 J~. L S ~~i=. ' .
~" ~ INSUC~'w1NCE C~MPANY
825 Norih Broadway, Santa Ana. Cali(omia
, Tolephone ffimberly 7-7251
~
Your No..........OBl4 ..............:.......... , ~ FRELINlNARY REPQRT . i
' . + .,
Our Order No........2$~~~],-3'!ffi'........ ,:; . ,
• .
Friendl;~ Fi;,lls Escrow '
1720 Z~;~s ~ 7~a Palma •
. • Anahe3m, California
Attn: A1ice V. Carsrud
~ . ~
This report is issued preiimina;y tn :~•cc;;::,~'. ::r,: .... ,. a,-,d iw:uanae o( go:icy oi liUe insu;ancc
in connection with this ordor. Our liability is solely that expressed in such policy. No separa6~, lia-
bility is assumed by thts report'except that if no policy is issued under this o~der the cmount paid
~tor this report shall be the maximum lictbil{ty of the compatty.
. • • ~ SECURTfY TITLE INSURANCB COMPANY
' ~^!~~ ~j ..Y~~^-J'
By ........... .. . ......... ...... '
Da~ed as oE 7:30 A.M. on January ~2, 1g63 . ~~ll~am B. Thomas ~
• . i
Vestee: . '. •
NAN J. SCBTT and NA L. SCOTT, husband and reife, as ~oint tenants. ,
. . . . ~• . • i
The land referred to in this report is in the state of Cali[omia, county of pr~e t
T_.~wi por~io:z oP the West one-halP of the Southrrest quarter of the
Southeast q-zarter of Section 13, in Tormship 4 South, Range 11 41est,
P•ancho Los Coyotea, as shown on a map thereof recorded in boolt 51, }
• pa~e 11, Offic~.al Records, described as Fo3lowa: .
~~ •. Commeazc3.ng at `c:~e Southwest coxner of ~ aaid West ~ one-half o~ the
~ 841?th~aest quarter oP the Soutl:e~ast qua.rter, runnint, thence Bast '
~ alon~ the Southerly line of saia Z,1est haTf.214.5 feet to a point
~•• 450 feet S~Jest of the East line of said tVest one-h~ilP; said point .
bein,g 'tre L•rue po3nt of beg:innin, oF the land ~here3r~ descrii:e~;;
~hea.ce iloxtherly pas~al~el r:i~h ~aicl ~asb line 365 teet; thc::c;: jv'GSt-
' erly parallel vrith ,said sout:~erly I.3ae 79.5 feet to a poiii~ _;;~ .z~e~ ~
East of the West line of sa~.d Vte~~ one-half; thence Sou~herl~ "
. . R~CtASS. N0. ~•z° ~~`~ ~
. ~ , • ~ .-:~ ~~~~~~ et~~f9
~~ - • , ~ • i
, . _~ . ~~~
' ~ 23~:;51-S~TBT •
' .• .. _ 2
.:.•.,.llel w3.'~h said VJest Zine 3~5 feet, more or les~, ~o the Sc'..:~?'--
;;~^~ ~.~- line of ::,'a ~'^z'~ hal~; thence East . long said Soui;herl~: '~.:1~
79,j ,-~ee~, ~~~.:.. +.. •.:., to the true poir.~ of be~:Lnnin,~.
~• ~tOTE: Sw~.d iand 3.s described on the County Tax Assessment Roll ~o:^
. , t1~:e fiscal year 19~2-63, ~,s A. P. No. 126-220-6.
; SL~7EGT i0: •
' l. 1!n easemenb for roads,.railroada and ditchett over ~he Southe~:!y
30 ~ce~ o~: ~aid lanc:; also the use anfl con'crol o~ cie:~e;~~:, ~~:la
, na~ural s~rea~aN of rrater, if any, n~tuxa7.ly upo~, i'1o;:i.r,,; ~.::ros~.yc.,
:I..,'.o or by ~aid ~ract, and the ri~ht of vsaY~- for and to CGiiJ INS~LLC V
irr~i;;~.Llon or dralna~e ditches thro~~;iz sa~d txact to ir~.~igate or
~~ drain the adJacent land, as reserved in deeds of record.
~; 2. Pdatters which may affect the title unless eliminated by statement
of identity'~rom all part3es. ~• '.
i '
j , +/: i!~ ,JF ~## it Ye 9F 3F
'' NO^~: Tai:es for the fisc~l year 1962-63 i~a.ve bcen pa~:d. :~nounts
i ror pro-ratinn purposes are: Tota1 $126.70; firaN ~.ns~allment ~63•33;
; second installment~~63.37~ • .. • ' ' •.
: . . __ __ . _ ~ - . '~ . . ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ' . .
~ _ -- -_~ _;~~;:;
~.
~~~ ~ ~~ ,~~ ~ ~ ~.'~ ~'~ I i ~~
.~ .> . '~~ -'•~, 1
j i ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Plenning Commission does heceby recommend
to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that ~ubject Pe~ition far Reclessificetion be denied on the basis of the
eforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOI.UTION is signed and epproved by me this lst day of April~ 1963.
i
, '
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY ANNING COMMISSIOPI .
ATTEST:
/
V
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs ~ ~ccetecy of thp City Planning Commission oi the City of Anaheim, do hereby cectify that the fore-
going resolution wes pessed and adopted et a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Maheim, held on
Ap'ril '1„ 1~63, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the followinq vote of the members thereof: ',
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chavos, Craig, Gauer, Mungall, Pebley, Perry, Si~les.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: N~ne~
ABSTAINe OOMMISSIONERSs Campo
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allredo
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heva hereunto se! my hand this lst day of April~ 1963.
___L~~~~~ `~ ' -
SECRETARY ADTAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. 706
R2-D -1,-