PC 1962-1963-715~ ;w 1 1 /
RESOLUTION N0.~15~ SERIES 1962-63
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
R~PETITIONFOR RECLASSIFICAT ON NO.F6~163C~4 ~ BE PRO ED T
1YHEREAS, the City Planning Commisaion of the City of Aneheim did receive e vedfied Petition for Reclessifica-
tionfrom GHJRGE P. McCLAIN, 112 East Rosslynn, Fullerton, California, Owner of certain
real property situated in the City of Anah~im, County of Orange, State of California,
de:,cribed as, PARCEL N0. 1: Lot No. 11, Block 4 of Tract No. 304, as shown on a rap
thereof recorded in book 14, page 50, Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange~County.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM the Westerly 2.75 feet thereof, as granted to the City of Anaheim.
PARCEL N0. 2s Lot Nos. 12 and 13, Block 4 of Tract No. 304, as shown on a map •thereor
recorded in book 14, page 50, Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County; 'EXCEPT-
IA'G THEREFROM the Westerly 2.75 feet thereof, as granted to i;he City of Anaheim
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commissica did hold a public hearing et the City Hall in the Ciry of Aneheim on
April 15, 1963, at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of said public hearing having been duly given es required by
lew and in accordence with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.72, to heer and consider evidence
fac and against seid ptoposed ceclessification end to investigate and make findings end recommendations in connection
therewith; end '
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspectioa, investigation, end study made by itself and in its behalf, and
after due consideration o; all evideace aad ceports offeced at seid hearing, does und and de~termine the following fects:
1. Thet the petitionec proposes a ceclessification of the ebove described prope:ty from the C-2, General
Cor~unercial, Zone to the C-3, Heavy Commercial, Zone to establish a used automobile sales
lot and off iceso ~
2. That the proposed reclessification of subject pmperry is necessery and/or desicable toc 4he orderly end pro-
per development of the commuqity.
3. That the pcoposed reclassificetioa oE subject propeNy does peoperly relete to 4he zones and their permitted
use~ la~ally established in close proximity to subject properry and to 2he zonms and theic permitted uses genecally esteb-
lished throughout the community.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does not require dedication
for and standard improvement of abutting streets because said property does relate to and
abut upon streets and highways which are improved to carry the type and quantity of traffic,
which will be generated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the c?.r~:u?ation element
of the General Plan.
5. That no one appeared in opposition to subject pe~tition.
~ Rl-r~
I
i
t
~
I.
~
----- - - r,;,
. . ._ ~. . ~ . ... 'r'.',. _ ~ . ~~
-1-
----- -~-------......----____.______.-_..._ _ _._.
_ :~
~ . _
:7
~ ` : - f~ ",
NOVl, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLi~ED thet the Aaaheim City P'laaning Commission does haeby recommead
to the City Council of the City of Meheim thet subject Petitioa for Rtclasai$c~tion be epproved nnd, by so doing,
thet Title 1&Zoning of the Aneheim Municipel Code be emended to exclude the ebove described pxoperty from the
G2, General Commercial, Zone and to incorporate said described property in the C-3, Heavy
Commercial, Zone upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary
prerequisite to the proposed use of subject pronerty in order to preserve the safety and gen-
erel :velfare cf the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
lo Repair of curbs and damaged and/or hazardous sidewalks on La Palma A~enue and Los Angeles
Street in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City ~ngineer.
2o Removal and~or reconstruction of substandard driveways on la Pa1ma Avenue and Los Angeles
Street in accordance with the adopted standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineer.
3o Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works,
Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspaction.
4. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Item
Nos~ 1, 2, and 30
5o That the owner of subject praoerty place on record standard City of Anaheim C-3 Deed
Restrictions, approved by the City Attorney, which restrictions shall limit the use of subject
property to a used car sales lot or any C-2 uses.
6a That the existing structure on the northerly portion of subject property shall be limited
to off ices in conjunction with the used car sales lot, and that any modification of the existing
building shall be sub3ect to approval of Development Review.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is s3gned end approve-,I by me ¢t,is 15in day of April, 1963.
CHAIRMRN ANAHEDM CITY PLANNING CO~dISSION
PRO TFM
ATTEST:
SECRETARY ANAHEIlH CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUIdTY CF OR{~NGS ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs ~ Seccetery of the City Planning Cummission of the City of Anahefim, do hereby certify that the fore-
going resolution wes passed and adoptcd at a meetiag of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
ApriT 15~ 1963~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the folloa~ing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavo~}; Gauer, Mungall Pebley, Sides.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
AHSENT: COMMISSIQNERS: Craig, Perry.
IN WITN~,SS WHEREOF, I have hereuato set my hand this 15th day of April~ 1963.
_ Li~~~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM i.ITY PLANNING ~OMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. ~15 '
R2-A -2-
___ __--. _--. .___ __ _-------_.-,--- ----._ ..---- _.._._._--.-.._.__..: ~__--- --------___._... _ .__ _.,
~
... ~ , ' ~