PC 1962-1963-729n
~ . ~ } `}
RE50LUTION-NO. 729+ SERIES 1962-63 `
~ A RE50LUTION OF THE C£fY PLAAiNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
; THAT PETI'IiOH FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT P10. 379BE DEN:ED
WHEREAS, the CiE1~ Plenning Commis~ion of the City of Aneheim did t~ eive a verified Petition for Conditional
UsePecmitfrom CHIP CHASINy 1$Ol N~wport Boulevard, 5laite 221, Costa Mesa, California, Owner;
' NhlNII.L LITTLE9 1425 East Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California, Agent of certain real property
~ situated in the City of Anaheira, County of Orange, State ef California, as described in Exhibit
„ "A" attached hereto and referred to herein as though set forth in full ,
. ; end
WHEF.EAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public heedng at the City Hell in iha Csty of An.heim on
Ap•, il 15~ 1963~ at 2:00 o'ciocn Y.t~i., notice of seid public hearing having beep duly given as required bp
lew end in accordance with the provisions of the Aneheim Muaicipal Code, Chaptet 18:64, to hear end consider evidence
for end ageinst said proposed condiHoael use and to iavestigete and make fiadings and recommendations in connection ;
thecewith; end •
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inapection, iaveatigation, en6 etudy aade by itself end in its behalf,
end efter due consideration of all evidence and iepods offeced et seid hearing, does fiad and detetmine tfie folloasg fads: ~
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a Conditionel Use Parmit is authorized by this Code, to wit:
construct a service station on subject propertye
2~ That the proposed use will adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth
and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located.
3o That the traffic 9enerated by the proposed use will impose an undue burden upon •i
the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area.
4~ Thst the granting of the condition2l use permit under the conditions imposed, if any,
will be detrimental to the peace, heal~th, safety and yeneral welfare of the citizens of the
~ City of Anaheim~ ,
5,. That the proposed location of a•service station in the middle of a block would be an
incompatible development and a detriment to future development of adjacent property: -
6. That development pians were incomplete for tne rear portion of subject property.
s
Cl-D -1-
~
~ ;
y
~ ` ' ?
~ ~ _ _ _ _ _ __ s
3 -.__._ .. _ ,.: ...s. ',
€ . . ~~ ' ~ ~..'_.:. ~ .a
~ " /
NOW,.THEREFORE, IIE IT R~SOLVED that the Aneheim City Planning Commission does hereby deny aubject
PeLition for Conditional Use Permit on the basis of the afarementioned findIngs.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIOId is signed and approved by me.this 15th day of April~ 1963.
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIlH CITY PLANNING COMMISSI
PRO TFJ~I
ATTF:ST:
%~~~~"~C/ _
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
T, Ann Krebs, Secretery of the City Planning Commission of the City of Maheim, do hereby cedity that the fore-
going resolution w~s pessed end adopted at a meeting of the City Pianning Commission ofthe City of Anaheim, held on
April 15, 1963, , at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the membets thereof: ~
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, MUngall, Sides.
NOES: COMMISS:ONERS: Pebleyo '
'AHSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Craig, Perry.
IN WITNESS R'HEREOF, I have he:ennto set my hand this ?5th day of April~ 1963.
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNI~TG COMMISSION
;;{ ~ RE50LUTION NU. 729
C2-D
c
~ _
~ ._.._..'_ _'_ "a ::'~~' ,I
.:.'1i?
.~
!
.
y4
.. ._ . .. . . _. .... _... -.. . .._ . ... . ... ~7
"~~A.~..-: _, ~i