PC 1962-1963-735.._ ,
~
O'.~ ~ ~ ~~7 ~ '
~ -
~
~~ _ , ;
RESOLUTION-N0. ~35, SERIES 1962-63' ~ ~"~
A RESOLUTIO~Y OF T8E CHTY PLANNAQG COMMLSSION OF THE CTfY OF A2~AH~'f
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERNQT N0. 414 BE DENIED
f:I
i.,I
WHEREAS: the Ciry Planniag Commis~ioa of the City of Aneheim did receive a rerifie3 Pditim Eor C~~tiaea!
Use Pecmit from CAUNTRY DEVIIAPMENT, INC., 10600 Katella, Anaheim, Caiifornia, O~rapa; -~DY
~~~ JOHN90N, 224 West 5th Street. Santa Ana, California, Agent of certain seal ~ra~~~ sn~u~ted
~ in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as Znr d~n. P cs~
Tract Noo 3886, as shown on a Map recorded in Book 151, pages B, 9 and i~ or" Dtiscell~ea~s
~°~; Maps, records of Orange County, Califorriia
:~
WHEF.EAS, the Ciry Plenning Commi~eion did hold a public heariag at the ~ity F~all ia the Ciiy of l.~ca~ aa
April 29~ 1963~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice c.f said public heariag havingbeea dciy gv~ea as:eqmxedbg~
lew and in aeeo~deaee with the provisions of the Aneheim Mnaicipel Code, Chepter 18:64, Yo ~ear and cnesida e~i3e~ce
for and egainst seid pmposed rnaditional use and to iaveatigate and make findings aad reco~mea3aYic~s ia wsae~ian
therewith; and
WHEREAS, seid Commission, after due iaspection, investigation, end study aade by iY~sel£ aad ia ~ts ~aI~
and after due consideration of ell evidence end reporta offeied at said hearing, does fiad and d~ia~ ~~ fxls
1. Thet the ptopoaed u~e is properly oae for which a Conditional ZJse Pecmit is acthodud by this Code, to WiL•
establish a walk-up restaurant and a hofbrau.
2. That the proposed uses will adversely affect the adjoining land uses aan~d ~
growth and devel.opment of the area in which it is proposed to be iocated.
3. That the sale of alcoholic beverages within 600 feet of a szhool ar~uIld ~se~e ~
detrimental environment for school age children in the area.
4. That the proposed uses would be incompatible to the area in ~w}~ic3~
to be locatedo
5. That subject property should be developed in accordance wi~ apps
commercial plans reclas6ifying subject p'roperty to the G 1, Neighborho~d C.~
under Reclassification No. 61-62-16.
6o That one letter was received in opposition to subject petitaon.
~
.
_ ..
- ~-- -- -- .... . - ----_....._
k ^
i
, ~. _ '1 a ~~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RE50LVED thet the Aneheim City Plenning Commission does hereby d~y subject
PetiUon for Conditional Use Permit on the besis of the aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me.this 29 of April~ 1963.
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PL ING COMMISSIONT
ATTEST:
~
%~~~r2~~ ~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) `
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) se.
CITl OF ANAHEIM ) ~
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planairtg Commission of the Ciry of Aneheim, do heceby certify that the fore- ~
going resolution was pasaed end adopted at a meeting of the City Plenning Comr~ission of the City o~' Anaheim, held on
~ April 29~ 1963~ , et 2:00 o'c2ock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
i AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Mungall, Pebley, Perry, Sides.
i '
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
'ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
~ 1N WITNESS WHEREOF, I hevo hereunto set my hand this 29th day of April~ 1963.
. ,~~~ l//Li7/!'v
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. ~35 ~
, C2-D _~
~
~
_.___ _ __....-- ---__.__ _.._..._._
------.~.._
~ ----.. ---_ .,__ _--... . --
.,::,;, ~
~ i. ~`.~-.