PC 1962-1963-793., ~;~
r.
~ _ . r'~ ~.~
793, SERIES 1962-63
RESOLUTION N0.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 430 ~gE GRAN ED HEIM
TFIAT PETITIOPi FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
WfiEREA°i~ ~hmMitY ~1 pA~F~ 220 Bartlett A enue,~lNoodla d,eCalifornlia POwner•,tOLAdSl1ITT,
Use Permit icom +~-~~--~~- ..° - p~ ~r-= -,
DBA WCTS TNC>, 1800 Esplanade, Redondo Beach, California, Agent oi cer~ai~~ r~a1 °"
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Californ;.a, described as the
North 60 feet of Lot Noso 17, 18, 19, & 20o The north 60 feet of the east 10 feet of Lot
No. 16, Block K of the new subdivision of Vineyard Lot 0-5 as shown on a map recorded in
book 17 page 72 of Miscellaneous records of Los Angeles County Clerk, and further described
as 119 North Lemon
; end
.~
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did ho;d a public heacing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on ;
June 10~ 1963~ at 2:00 0';.lock P.M., notice of said public h Cheptec 18.64b t hea ecd cons der evidence ~
law und in acco:dance with the p~ovisions of the Aneheim Municipel code, >
for and e~ainst said p:oposed crondSt3onel use aad to investigate and meke findings and cecommendstions in connection ~
thecewith; end ~ ;
WHEREAS, said Commission, aftee due inepection, iavestigation, end study made by itself aad in its behelf, and `y
aftec due consideiation of all evidence and :epoda offeced et neid heacing, does find end determine the following fects: f
1. That the pcoposed use is ptoperly one for which a ConditionaS .Uae Perinit is authocized by this Code, to ~
wit: estabiish trade school-in ar. ex3sting building on su~ject propertya %
2, That the p~oposed use will not advecsely affect,the a~joining lend uaes and the gcowth and development of ~i
the azea in which it is pcoposed to be located.
3. Thet the size and ahape of the site psoposed for the use is adequate to allow the fttll development of the ;
proposed use in a menner not detrimeatel to the pasticular ecea nor to the peace, health, safety, end ¢eneral welface '
of the Citizens of the City of Aneheim. . ,
4, That U~e gxanting of the Conditional Use Permit under the conditions imposed, if eny, will' not be det:imental ``
to the peece, health, safety, and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Aneheim. ;
5~ That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden ;
upon the streets and highways designed and improved i:o carry the traffic in the axea. ~
6~ That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition~ ,7
.1.
Cl-G
;~
: .,...._. .. . ~
~ ~ ~. ~~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Maheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject
Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the following conditions which are heceby fo;;nd to be a necessary prerequisite
to the proposed use of the subJect property in order to preserve the safety end generel welfere of the Citizens of the
City of Aneheim:
lo That subject propez•ty sha'l1 be developed substantially in accordance with plans and
specifications on file w3th L•he City of Anaheim, marked "Exhibit Noo '1"~
TNE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end eppcoved by me this lOth day of June~ 19630
. ~ ~~ ~,
CHAIRhtAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COhiMISSION
PRO TFsA
SECRETARY ANAF~E}M CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
PRO TEM ~J
STATE OF !:ALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM ) ~
I9 Ann Krebs ~ Secretary of the City Plenning Commission o£ the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify thet the
foregoing :esolution was pessed end adopted at e meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim,
hel~ on June 10~ 1963 ~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the folloe~ang vote of the membcrs thereof:
AYkS: COMMISS;ONERS: A11red, Camp9 Chavosy Gauery Pebiey, Perryy Rowland, Sides.,
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Noneo
ABSENT: CON,MIS510NERS: Mungalla
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I havehereunto set my hand this TOth day of Jline~ 19630
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. ~93
C2-G
._~ ,
_ .. -'.~