PC 1962-1963-804`~
RESOLUTIpN NO. 804~ &ERIES 196?-63
A?ESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNIIC~r COMC4ISSION 1
~~~ ^1rifsT P,~.T*.TrON F012 VARIANCE N0. 1582
_____..__ ---_ _____._.. ___..___--_.__.__.
„
,
~...,1 ;
~._~ ~
~
)F THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ~
BE DEIvIED ' ;
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive a vedfied PeUEion for Verience from
MIIES Oo HANN~ 10691 Allen Drive, Garden Grove, California, Owner; VAL ZAJEC REALTY,
ia422 verano 3ireet, Garden tirove, l;elitorniay Agent of certain real property situated in
the City o: At~aheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as Lot Noo I of
TraCt Noa 1948, and fvrther described as 1016 North Magnolia, Anaheim, Califor~fa
; end
WHEREAS, tha City Plenning Commisaion did hcld a public heedng at the CIty Hell in the City of Anahei~c on
June 24~ 1963~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing heving been duly g~ven es required by
lew end in axordence with the provisfons of the Maheim Municipel Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear and coaeider evidence fs~
and ageinat seid pmposed verience end to investlgate and meke findiag's end tecommendations in connection therr~with;
end
WF?EREAS, seld Commiselon, aEter due inspection, investigatinn, end etudy mede by itself and in its be4:1f,
end eRer due consideration oF ell evidence and reports offered es seid heering, does Eind end determine the following
fects: • ~
1. Ti~et the petitionet requests e:•a:~ence from the Aneheim Municlpel Code: SeCtion 18 0 24 0 010~ whiCh
stipulates the permitted uEes in t~e R-1, Single Family Residential, Zone, to establish
a real estate offi~eo
2e That there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the proparty that do not
apply ganerally..to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zoneo
3o That the requested variance is not n€ce~sary for the preservation and en~oyment
of a substantial property right possessed by~other property in the same vicinity and zone,
and denied to'the property in questi~no
40 'That sub3ec•t property has inadequate parking facilities, and that ingress and
egresc to an existing alley for use of commercial parking at the rear of sub~ect prop2rty
was not the intended use of said residential alley~
5o That one (1) person appeared in opposition and two (2) persons appeared in favor
of sub~ect petitiono
.
' 1
~ '
~
~~,
' ~. '
~
A. _.~...~ ................~...+..~ ........~....~.~.~.. .
y
~ \
~ ~ J
~
; ~
a
!
'
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RES4LVED thet the Anaheim Ciiy Plenning Commission does hereby deny subJect )
petit~on for Veriance on the basis of the nfocementioned findings. ";
~
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end approved by me this 24th day of Juney 1963, `~
~
i
~
~
i
CHP,IRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISS f
PRO TF~7 i
ATTES'1': !
~~//~~ ~ . ' ;
~ ~i~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 ~
SECRETAR`! ANAHEIht CITY PLANNING COMPdISSION ~
i
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
CQUNTY OF ORkNGE ) es~ ' ' j
CITY OF ANAHEIM ) ~
Iy Ann KTebsy Secretery of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anehelm, do he~eby cedity thnt L`~e foze- ~
going ~eaolution was pessed end adopted at a meeting of the City Plenning Coiamistslon of the City of Aneheim, held on j
June 249 1963y at 2:00 o'clock P,M., by the .'ollowing vota of ~=" ~embe~y- tue~eof: ;
:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Gauer, Pebley, Perry, Rowland, Sideso !
(
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None. ~
i
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Camp, Chavos, Mungall~ (
I
IN WFTNESS WFiEREOF, I heve heceunto set my hend this 5th day of Julyy 1963e ~
~
~~ i
, --+~~
' SECRETARY A?QAHGIh~CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
;
R~;SOLUTION NO. 804
~~ V2-D ' .
..2-