PC 1963-1964-850A RESOLUTION.9F THE CITY PI,ANNING C01~MTSSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PEfITIQI~ FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 63-64-10 BE GRANTID
WHEREAS, the City Plannirig Cortunis~ion of the City oi Anaheim d3d initiate a vesified Petition
for Feclassification of certain.real property situated .in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State of California, describad as s PORTION "A"; all of Tract No> 3011, as shown on a Map
recorded in Book 94, paqes 12 and 13 of M3.scellaneous Maps, records of Orange County, California,
EXCEPTING THERE~ROM the Southerly 27,00 feet lying within Midway Drive, and the Southwesterly
14s00 feet lying within Palm Street; PURTION "B": Blocks 2, 3, 4, and 5 of Tract IQoa 419, as
oii'vin?i 'vi~ a ivid'p rOCGrcieti .in u[iok ioy pny ~~ ^---y- y~
C L UI Ml$1;C11G11@V115 nid S i'cGvi.uS vi vi~ait a CGuTti.
California; Lot 5 and the Southerly 12040 feet of Lot 4 of Jospeh f'iscus Subdivision, as
shown on a Map recorded in Book 8, page 73 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange
County; and a tr3.angular parcel of Lot 7 of Joseph Fiscus Subdivision, as shown on a Map
recorded in Book 8, qage 73 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County, bounded o~
the North by the South line of Midway Drive, on the East by the Westerly line of Block 5 of said
Tract Noo 419, and on the southwest by the Northeasterly line of the Santa Ana Freeway~
except therafrom the northerly 150 f eet of the easterly 90 feet measured from the existing center-
line of Midway Drive of said described property~ and
WHEREAS~ tha City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the
City of Anaheim on July 22, 1963, at 7e00 o'clock P.M;y notxce of said public hearing having
been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the prcvisions of the Ananeim
Municipal Code, Chapter 18,72, to hear a~id consider evidenc~ for and a9ainst said proposed
reclassification and i;o investigate and make findings and r~commendations in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS9 said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself
and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said
hearing, does f ind and determine the following factsa
lo That subject petition, initiai:ed by the Anaheim Planning Cormr.ission, proposes a
reclassification of Portion "A" from the R-A; Residential Agricultvral; Z~ne to the R-3;
Multiple Family Residential, Zone, and further proposes the reclassification of Portion "B"
from the R-A, Residential Agricultural, Zone and R-1, One Fami.ly Residentialy Zonc to the R-3,
Multiple Family l2esidential, Zon.,.
2o That the proposed reclassif ication of Portion "A" is unconditionally recommended for .
approval, because of the existing development on subject property, with the ex~eption of
Lot Noso 29 and 30 of Tract Noo 3011y which are developable in accordance with the provisions
of the R-3 Zone,
3e That the proposed reclassif ication, in part, of Portion "B" is determined to be
n~cessary and desirable for the orderly and proper development of the commuriity;"does praperly
relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity to subject
property and generally established throughout the coirJnunity, and does require dedication for
and standard improvement of abutting streets, unless said streets, in part, are appaoved for
abandonment by the City of Anaheim, because said property does relate i;o and abut iapon streets
and highways which are not fully improved to carry the type and quantity of traf£ic generated
by the existing and permitted uses in accordance with the circulation element of the General
Plan, providod however, that these f indings do not a~ply to those properties included within
Partion "B" which are not pr?sently being used for multiple family residential or trailer park
purposes for which land use permits have been grantad by the County of Orattge or the City of
Anaheim, and therefore, only the following described propertic~ of Portion "B" are racortunended
for reclassification to the R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone, and that the remainder of
Porticn "B" is recommended fo•r denials .
Lot Noso 4y 5, 25, or Block 2; Lot Nos 5, 6, 21, 22, 23, and 26 of Block 3~ Block 4;
Block 5 of Tract Noo 419 as shown on a Map in Book 16, page 2 of Miscellaneous Maps records
of Orange County, California; Lot 5 and the southerly 12<40 feet of Lot Noe 4 of Joseph
Fiscus Su'odivision, as shown on a Map recorded in Book 8, page 73 of Miscellaneous Maps, records
of said Orange County, and a triangular parcel of Lot 7 of Joseph Fiscus Subdivision as shown
on a Map recorded in Book 8, page 73 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange Caunty~ bound-
ed on the North by the South li~e of Midway Driva, on the East by the Westerly line of Block 5
of said Tract Noo 419, and on the Southwest by the N ortheasterly line of the Santa Ana Freevray,
excepting therefrom the noril~erly 150 feet of t~e easterly 90 feet measured from the existing
centerline o£ Midway Drive of said described property, '
4. That one person represanting four persons in the Council Chamber appeared in opposition
to the reclassification of Portion "B" of sub~ect propexty.
Rl-A _ 1..
.......- ---- -~--- __ .. _. ____- -.. _ _...__..__ _.. ...----• ,_._-. ..~---.._. ....___,__. _~..~....
,.~ ,. ......._. _-------;
_ -..; ., .~ ~ .
--- -- -- - -~ .
" . ~ ~ :;}
;r -
, ' IN?TIATED BY THE PLANNTNG DEPART.MENT
- . ~X~IIBT7C `~,A,~
DESCRIPTION FOR REZONE OF AREA OF MIDWAY DRTVE~AND SANTA ANA FREEWAz~ AS REQUESTID
BY PLANMNG DEPARTM.ENf.
;
~
,~~C:II. ONF:
All of Tract No. 3011, as shown on a Map recoxded in Book 94, pages 12 and 13
of Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County, California.
EXCEPTING TI~REFR~VI the Southerly 27.00 feet lying within Midway llriva and the
~Southwesterly 14.00 feet lying within Palm Street.
PARCEL TWOt .
ulnrks 2; 3; 4 and 5 of Tract No. 419, as shown on a Map recorded in Book 16, ,
page 2 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County, California, including
Lemon Street~ Clementine Street and Dickel Street adjacent thereto.
PARCEL THREEs .
Lot 5 and the.Southerly ?~.40 feet of Lot 4 of Jaseph Eiscus Subdivision, as
shown on a Map recorded in Book 8, page 73 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of
said Or.ange County. , ,
PARCEL FOUR: '
A triangular parcel of'L•ot 7 of Joseph fiiscus Subdivision~ as shown on a Map
recorded in Book 8, page 73 of Miscellaneous Maps, recods of said Oranga County,
bounded on the North by the South line of Midway Driye, on the East by ~.he
Westerly line of Block 5 of said Tract No. 419, and on the Southwesterly by
the *?ortheasterly line o~ the Santa I!na Freeway.
~~ ~
b~.
Wr~I '
.. ~ . .. ..._.... _"".'" ...._. --_...._ .... . ........... ......_...._..._... .....-. .__. _.._.....,..-.... _. ~._..-_.._..~._. ~.......__~.~_. _..._._'__"_ - . .
~
a Y,
3
~
J
"
. ..__._,...~._.~_._.
. __' '"___._.-. ~ _"'"~_'
.._ , . ..,
__ . .~._ .... .. F+i.~ ' i . .
_..._._..""'__...._-_"_....~'"_.~__.Y..._.. __.~....._,-.~,.
, n , :
~-....._~
11-
'zj „'
~- i ~
_
~~: /
~
~
R ,=
~`~ _..
.
!f . .
;~
I~N-, THERFFQRE, BE IT RFSOI.VID that .the Anaheim City Plannis~g Commission does hereby
reco~end to the City Council of the Czty of Maheim that sub3ect Peti~tion for Reclassification
be~approved in part, and by so doing, that Title 18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code
be ame~~ded to exclude the above described Portion "A" from the R-A, Residential Agricultural,
Zone unconditionally to the R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone; and furtY~er, that those
contained Kithin Portion "B", described in Finding Noo 3 above, be excluded from the R-A, Resi-
dential Agricultural, and R-1, One Family Residential, Zones and to incorporate said desoribed
property in the R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone upon the following cottditions which
are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the sub~ect property
in order to presexve the safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheima
1, That the ownexs of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of
iouu t~~a~~t :'~; rnol Foo± _„ wirith; from the. centerline of the street9 along Midway Drive
y-c y',.e ~....~ ~.._a....
extending from the Santia Ana Freeway to 290 feet, more or less, easterly, :or s~rc=t ~;i~~~,~.~y
purposeso
~ 2o That street improvement plans shail be prepared and all engineering requirements of
the City of Anaheim along Zeyn Street, Lemor: Street„ Clementine Street, Dickel Street,
f and Midway Drive, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage
` facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer
~ and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on i.ile in the office of the City
k Engineero
{ 3o That a six (6) foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the westerly boundary of
k Portion "B" where said property abuts the Santa Ana Fre2way s•ight-•of-waye
~;.
u:_ 4a Payment of $2000 per front foot, or the installation of street lights along ~yn,
~; ' Lemon, Clementine, and Dickel Streets, and Midway I?rive, where those portions have not been
:- paid under previous zoning applicationso
ir' 5a That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim $125000 for the
reclassifzcatian of those pxoperties of Portion "B" in accordance wit?~ che resolution
~'= passed by the Cit;~ Cour.cil on March 12, 1963o above mentioned, sha77 h,a complied with within
~~ 6a That Condition Noso 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5,
~? a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further t9.me as the ~%:.`.~~ Council may grant.
THE FORBGOING RESOLUTION is signed and
ATTESTa
~ -
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
approved by me~ lst d::y of August, 1963a
~ ~ d ~ ,
r
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLA NG COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) sso
CITY OF ANAHEIM ) '
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary o: the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a mec:ting of thebCi~hePlanning ?
Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on July 22' 1963, at 7f0i; o"clock P.Mo~ y ~
follow3ng voie of the members thereof: '~
pYESs COMMISSIONERSi Allred, Camp, ~avos, Gauer, Mungall, Pe~ley, Perry' Rowland, Sides.
D(pESt COMMISSIONERSa Nonee ~ -
pgSENTs COMMISSIONFRS; Nonee
IN WITNESS WHFREOF~ I have hereunto set my hand this lst day of Augast.. J.963a
. ~~~ ~~ .
S ETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNInG COMMI5510N
`
RESOLUTION N0, 850 ~
R2-A r2
~---- -