PC 1963-1964-855~,t;r.....
~ ~[
~2•
°f~~
;lz:
~
`~r4
z~:
:~~.,;
~:
r:
~
t
~
,,
. ..
.,~ `
RESOLUTIOpY NO. 855, SERIES 1963-64
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMEtdDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 63-64-15 BE DENIED
WHEkEAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive e verified Petition for I2ecla'ssificn-
tionfrom FRANK So ANID AGNES Bo STEVENS, 2578 West Rome Avenue, Anaheim, California, Owners;
of real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Urang2, State of California,
described as Lot Noo 18, Tract Noo 2937, and further described as 2578 West Rome Avenue
; end
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
JUly 229 1963, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public heating having been duly given es requited
by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chepter 1ti.72, to hear and consider evi-
dence for and against said proposed reciassification and to investigate end meke finding:~ and :ecommendations in
connection therewith: and
WHEREAS, seid Commissian, after due inspection, investigetion, and study made by itself and in its behelf,
end after due consideration of ell evidence and cepods offered at seid hearing, does find end determine the following
facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes e ceclassification of the above described property from the R-ly One Family
Residentia~, Zone to the C-1, Neighborhood Commercialy Zone to expand a home occupatione
2e That the proposed reclassificatiun of subject property is not necessary and~or
desirable for the orderly and proper de~elopment of the communitya
3, That the proposed reclassification of subject property does not properly relate
to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity to sub3ect
property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established throughout the
communityo •
4, That the proposed reclass3fication and use would be incompatible to the existing
residential living environment adjacent to and in close proximity to subject propertye
5. That subject property is almost entirely surrounded by R-ly One Family Residential,
and R-A, Besidetttial Agricultural, Zoned property,
6o That one (1) person appeared, representing twelve (12) persons present in the
Council Chamber, and further presenting a petition signed by sixi:y-one (61) persons
opposing subjec•~ petitiono
Rl-D
-1-
.. _.. - ---___._ _._.__.... ...
...~.~ ..~~-~-~.~.- ~...~..~.~ .-~~~~. . ~ +. .
__ _"3..`r` . . ~-~ _ ~ ' _ --- _ ~'
f4~ ;~
-~~; , ,. . _ ..
~.v;;~:: ::
.~;,,.,;,
~.._
~
~~`
'a ,
.
•-
~:
~'
~.' ~
4~.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the elnaheim City Plenning Commission does hereby :ecommend
to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subject Petition for Reclassi~cetion be denied on the basis of the
afo~ementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESQLUTION is signed and eppcoved by me this lst day Of August' 1963e
1/j •
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLAN G COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~.~~~!Z?~/ _ _
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ,
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF AhAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krehs ~ Seccetery of the~ City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do he:eby certify thet the fore-
going resolution was possed end adupted at a mee,-,ing of !.he City Planning Commission of the City oE Aneheim, held on
July 229 1963, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., 3y the following vote of the members thereoi:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred9 Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Mungall, Pebley, Perry~ Rowiand,
Sideso
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Noneo
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Nonee
IN NITNESS WHEREOF, I heve heceunto set my hand this lst day Of August ~ 1963 e
_/~~~~~
cFrwFTARY ANAHEIlA CITY PLANNAVG COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 855 ~
R2-D
~ , , ________.~.,~---; --
_-. -=-~ `----- --~' ` '.
~
-2-