Loading...
PC 1963-1964-970: `. . . ... . ,, _ .., ,_ .,., ,,;-: -- ~. ~ RE30LUTION NO. 970. SERIES 1963-64 A RESOLUTION OF THE CYTY FLANNING COMMISSI~N OF 'fHE C11 Y Gr i+iSi+riEun RECOh1idENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANe1HEIM THAT , PETITION FOR,RECLASSIFICATION N0. 63••64-57 gE APPROVED VJHEREAS, the Ciry Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did ceceive a verified Petition for Reclassifica- tionfrom DAVID Wo HOOK, ROhALD Ao KAROS, ROBERT Po GILLMAN, and GUSTAFF T~ ERICKSON, 1780 West..Lincoln Avenue, Suite H, Anaheim, California, Owners of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as Parcel 1, the Easterly 551o3U feet of the Nor~h half of Lot 2, as shown on a Record of Suruey of part of Section 4, Township 4 South,~Range 10 West, So B, Bo 8 M,, filed in Book.l, page 55 of Record of Surveys in the office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California, excepting therefrom the South 27,OO.feet; Parcel 2, an Easement for ingress and.egress over the South 30000 feet of the.North 50000 feet of the North half... of.:Lot 2, as shown on a Record of Survey of.part of Section 4, Township 4 South, Range 10 West, So Bo B, & M., filed in Book 2, page 55.of Record of Surveys in the office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California, excepting therefrom the Easterly 551030 feet, and further described as 1144 North Euclid Street, Anaheim, California ; and WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commissioa did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Mehelm on November [i~ 1963~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of seid public hearir;g having been duly given as required by law end in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Mimlcipal Code, Chepter 18.72, to hear and consider evidence for and against seid ptoposed reclassification and to investigate and make findings and cecommendetions in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behelf, and efter due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the foliowing facts: 1. Tha; the petitionec proposes a reclassification of the above described property fmm the R-A~ . Residential Agricultural, Zone to the R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone to establish a one-story rnultiple iainily planned residential development v:ith carport~o 2. That the pmuosed reclassiiicaEion of subject property is necesseey 6ridJoe desirable :or :he orderly and pro- per development of the community. 3. Thet the proposed ieclessification of subject p:operty does properly relate to the zones end their permitted uses locally established In close proximity to subject property and to the zone, and their permitted uses generally estab- lished throughout the community. 4o That the proposed reclassification of subject property does not require dedication for and standard improvement of abutting streets becaL;.e said property does not relate to or abut upon streets ~nd highways which are improved to carry the type and quantity of irafiic, wnich wiil be generated py ine permitted uses, 3n accurua~~ce ;~it~~ t;~e circ~ia~i~n element of the General Plane 5. That the existing structure does comply with R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone standards except that carports are being proposed instead of garages and that adequate trash storage areas are not providedo 5: Tha± no ene appea*ed ir. on~os;tion to subj~ct•netitiono • Rl-A -I- • ~ ~° :~~ '~ ~~ .~' I •. _ -~; „'~i ~~E `v RESOLUTION N0. 970, SERfES ly(i3-(i4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT PETITIO~T FOR,RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64-57 gE APPROVED 14FiEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did cecelve a verified Petition for Reclassifica- tionfrom DAVID Wo HOOK~ RONkLD Ao KAROS~ ROBERT P~ GILLMAN, ar.d GUSTAFF T. ERICKSON~ 1780 4Yest:Lincoln Avenue, Suite H, Anaheim, California, Owners of certain real property situated in the Cit~ of Anaheir~i, County of Orange, State of California, described as Parcel 1, the Easterly 551o3Q feet of the North half o£ Lot 2, es shown on a Record of Suruey of part of Section 4, Township 4 South,~Range 10 West, So Bo Bo 8 Me, filed in Book.l, page 55 of Record of Surveys in the office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California, excepting therefrom the South 27o0Q.feet; Parcel 2, an Easement for ingress and eyress over the South 30000 feet of the North 50000 feet of the North half of.Loi: 2, as shown on a Record of Survey of.part of Section 4, Township 4 South, Range 10 West, So Bo ~, 8 M., filed in Book 1, page 55.of Record of Surveys in the office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California, excepting therefrom the Easterly 551030 feet, and further described as 1144 North Euclid Stree~, Anaheim, California end WHEREAS, the City Planning Commissioe did hold a public hearing at the City Hell in the City of Meheim oa November 27 ~ 1963, at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of said public hesring having been duly given as cequiced by law and in acco:denoe with the provisions of the Anaheim Mualclpal Code, Chepter 18.72, to heax and consider evidemce for end against said pPoposed reclassificution end to investigate ertd make findings and cecommenda4ions in connection therewith; and WFiEREAS, seid Commission, after due inspection, investigation, end study made by itself end in its behalf, and efter due rnnsideretion of ell evidence and reports offeced et said hearing, does find and determine the follo.wing facts: 1. That the petitloner proposes_a reclassificetion of the ebove desccibed property from the R-A~ Resi.dential Agricultural, Zone to the R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone to establish a one-story multiple family planned residential development with carportse 2. That the proposed reclassificetion of subject pcoperty is necessery end/or desirable for the ocderly and pro- per development of the community. ' 3. That the proposed reclessiflcation of subject pcoperty does properly celate to the zones and their permitted uses locally esteblished in close proximity to subject~pcoperty and to the zones and their permitted uses genecelly esteb- t•e~;va .u.~.. ~,,..,~ ~w~~ ~:~.. -- - • °'_-•-° - -----~ + 4a That the proposed reclassification of subject property does not require dedication for and standard improvement of abutting streets because said property does not relate to or abut upon streets and highways which are improved to carry the type and quantity of traffic, which will be generated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation element of the General Plan. 5. Thai ihe exisiing siruc~ux•e ~oes cc~~~ply uit}7 R".~iy °AUltiplc Family R~s:~?e.^.tial; ~one standards except that carports are being proposed instead of garages and tha~ adequate trash storage areas are not providedo 6a That no one appeared in opposition to subject~petitiono • Rl-A -1- ; 1 ~ 3 ~ s ; ~ :, ~,~ " v _ ___._-._---~Y . ~ i o ''• x ~~ ~ -1~' '~~ ,~ ~-_•! .-, _..v;:, A~ >~~; ~~b ~ NOW, THEREFORE, EE ?T RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Flenniag Commission does hereby eecommend to the City Cour.cil of the C:ty of Anaheim that subject Petition for Reclessification be approved end, by so doing, thet Title lit-Zoning of the Aneheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above descdbed pmperty from ti~e R=A, Residential Agricultural, Zone, and to incorporate said described property into the R-3, Multiple Family.Residential,.Zone, upon the.following conditions which are hereby found to be.a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject property in order to preserve 'the safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheimo -1~ That the completion of these reclassifical:ion proceedings is contingent upon the granting of a Conditional Use Permito 2. That an irrevocable easement granting access from subject property across the abutting property to the west,fronting on Euclid Street, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney's office prior to reclassificat3on of subject propertyo THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me this 6 of December' 19630 _n i ~ , CHALRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PL G COMIYISSION ATTEST: SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLA.NNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY CF OR~INGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I~ Ann Krebs~ . Secretery of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do he:eby certify thet the fore- :.,e ...~„i~-;nn was nessed and adopted at a meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on e=-••e -- November 27~ 1963~ et 2:40 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Mungali, Pebley, Sidesa NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Chavos, Gauer, Rowlando ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: perryo . n~.~rp;wCS` IWG`pFQF i hnae hereunto set my hend this 6th day of DeCembeT~ 19b3o u~ na. -~~~/ / !/I' v - SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 970 R2-A -2- ' ~ ,~ i '; ~ 5 ~ . r .~ A f ~ 1f S ;t .ra