Loading...
PC 1963-1964-1003; . _. . .._ _ ti-~-- -.__..w__.__.:_~ , . __. _ _.,.__.__._._...____---- . ..._._ _,~._.__ ..._ ~ .... ,:. .... ~ ---- . . . ., - ' i ~ . L_~ _ ~ ~ RESOLIITxON-NO. 1003 ~ - . . ; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF AN/~.HEIM THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 521BE DENIED WHEREAS, the City Plaslaing Commissloa of the City of Aneheim did receive a vedfied Petition for Conditional , Use Permitfmm MARY Ho HOSKIN, 810-816 South Magnolia Avenue, Anaheim, California, Owner; ~ VAL ZAJEC and~or BETT1 WILSON, 1016 North Magnolia Avenue~ Anaheim, California, Agents of ~ ' cer';ain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, i described as the South 140 feet of the North 390 feet of the West 310 f~et of the Southwest I yuarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 18, Township 4 South, Range 10 West~ in the ~ Rancho Los Coyotes~ as said section is shown on a map recorded in book 51, page 10, Miscel- laneous biaps, records of said Orange County, said North and South distances being measured along the West line of said section, and further described as 510-816 South Magnolia Avenueo ; and I ~VHEREAS, the City Plenning Coaimission did hold a public hearing at the City Hell in the ~:ty of Aneheim on DeCember 23~ 19639 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing having beep duly given as requiced by law and in accotdence v~Ith the pmvisioas of the Aneheim Municipel Code, Chepter 18:64, to hear and consider evidence i for and ageinst said pmposed conditional use end to investigate and make findings end recommendations in connection ~! thecewith; and • .l WHEREAS, aeid Commission, after due inspection, investigetion, and atudy mede by itself end in its behalf, end after due coaPideratioa of all evidence and cepotts ofEered et said hearing, does find and dete~mine the following facts: 1, That the proposed use is propetly oae for which a Conditional Use Permii is authorized by this Code, to wit: establish a.dog kennel on sub3ect prr~pertvo 2~ That the proposed use will adve~.•sel•~ affeci the adjoining land uses and the growth and.develop:nent of the area in wh3ch it is proposed to be locatecia 3o That the gianting of the Conditional Use Permit will be deteimental to the peace, health9 safetyy and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheimo 4e That the proposed use is incompatible with the surrounding single f amily developmento ~ 5o That three persons aoneared; one of whom presented a petii:ion signed by 58 persons opposing, and one person appeared in favor of subject petitiono Ci-~ .i. ~ • ~ . •: -~- _- _ . . . .. . : ~ . ..... ..._-- _ _._. . ,~~ ' ~ . ,. ,, . r `~ ~~~ ~.',, ~ ~ ~. S ~ : ~ 1 ) I I ' NOW,.THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Anaheim City Plenning CommissIon does hereby deny subject Petition for Conditionel Use Permit on the basis of the aforementioned findings. TSE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end approved by me.this 2nd day of January~ 19640 ~ CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY ANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: ~ %~~i%C.(~/ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CI'1'Y PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) sa. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I~ Ann Krebs ~. Secretery of the City Plenning Commission af the City of Aneheim, do heeeby certtfy thet the fo~e- going resolution wes paesed end edopted et a meeting of the City Pienning CoromiseIon o: the City of pnehaim, held on December 23, 1963~ , at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by th~e following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Cam~, Gauer9 Mungall, Perry, Rowland, Sides. NOES: COMMISSIaNERS: Nonee 'ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allredy Chavoa, Perryo IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hnve hereunto set my hand this 2nd day of January~ 1964. ~.~~?i%C/Yt/ ~~`v SECRETARY AI~IAHF.IM CI7!'Y PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 1003 C2-D '2' i i c ~_ _'. •_--.__~_.'_. '__......._..._ _.._._._~~, i' 1 ,~ ` t 1 : ! . .. . .. _ . -..:-..,...-....--~.-w._._.._..___ . _.. .__._. ___~.'.:.~...,........ ~c'"_ ~..... .~.:~....,.....,.,....__._.__" __"'~.1 __.................,.. - .. . .__ - _.. .. '.- . .. . . ~~. i"l 'L.l NOW,.TiiEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Anaheim City Planning Commisaion does hereby deny subject Petitian for Conditional Use Permit on the besis of the aforementione3 findings. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and app:oved by me.this 2nd day of January, 1964. CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY~ANPIING COMMISSION ~ AT7fE5T: %~~r~ ~:U~/ i ~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CIZ'Y PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) i COUNTY OF ORANGE ) as• CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I~ Ann Krebs ~, Seccetery oE the City Plenning Cammisaion of che City of Aneheim, do he~eby cedity that the fore- ~ going cesolution was pessed end adopted at a meeting oE the City Pla~,•ing Commisaion of the City of Anaheim, held on December 23~ 1963~ , at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote oa the membecs theceof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Camp, Gauer9 Mungall, Perry, Rowland, Sides. NOES: COMMISSI0NER5: Nonee 'ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allredy Chavos, Perryo IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve heceunto set my heed this 2nd day of January, 1964. ~_i i~ %~~~~ . SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ~,......::~ 1~^3 n~:.:.,L'....., . C2-D -2- - --~