PC 1963-1964-1019ti: :ti
;
i
.i
~ `~'
• . ~ 1
, - .
i ~
. .. .,~.._ . _
,... .
.,_.,. .._,.
::~. t .. - -
f
'.y :
_
riP v
RESOLUTION NO. 1019, SERIES 1963-~n
A RESOLUTIOt+ CG TKE ~IT~ ~i.ANNIKG ^.OMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
S~'c:CQ'.NhSF'::'*iNli Td TF:~e. i;~ft" ~.`.OUNCIL riF TH',E CITY OF ANAF£EIM THAT
Pc^:TITION F'OR RF.f';LASS~c ICA'CION I.'i0. ~'-64-68 gE APPROVED
W',tEREAS, :,ie City Plenning Commis~cion c'tbe ~Ciig~ af Meheim did recelve a verified Petition for Reclessifica-
tion f:c.-~ ~:wYSTONE SAVINGS 8 L6k'f °.:~vln..1M.TION~ 555 North Euclid Street and ANAHEIM INVESI'-
Iu1ENf ~QMF +NY, 551 North Euclid ::tr~et,• Ans::ei,~y California, Owners; RONALD W. CASPERS,
555 North Euclid Street, Anal~~.u?~a California, Agent of certain real property situated in
the City of Anaheim, CoLnty oY Orange, State of California, described as the north 56.58
feet of Lot Noo 55 and ~ot Nese 56~ 57, 58, 59; 60, 61, 63, 64, and 65 of Tract No. 1591
; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public headng at the City Hell in the City of Anaheim on
January 6~ 19G4~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of said public hearing having been duly given as :equired by
law end in accordance with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.72, to heer end consider evidence
for end egeinst said ptoposed reclassification end to iavestigate and meke findIngs end recommendetions in connection
the:ewith; end .
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due :lnspection, investigetion, and study made by itself and in its behalf, end
after due conside:etion of all evidence and reports ofEered at seid hearing, does find and determine the following fects:
1. Thet t'~e petitioner proposes a reclassification aE the ebove described propeety from theR-1~ Single Family
Residential, and C-1, Neighborhood Commercial, 2ones to the C-0, Commercial Office, Zone
to canstruct an addition to an existing office building.
2. Thet the proposed rec:te~~:ficat~on of subject pcopecty is necessery end/or desirable tor the ordecly and pra
per development of the community.
3. Thet the proposed reclessificetion of subject property does properly relete to the zones and their peanitted
uaes locelly esteblished in close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitied uses generaliy esEao-
lished throughout the community.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does require dedication for
and standard improvement of abutting streets because said property does relate to and abut
upon str.eets and higMv2ys which are proposed to carry the type and quantity of traffic,
which will be generated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation element
of the General Plane
5a That four persons appeared in opposition to subject propertyo
Ri-A
-1-
~
. ' ~ ~~
I ~ - ~
..._ ..........
......_.
.._.._
..v......._........ ~
... _
~
.i
_. .......~......
.. ...
. ~~. . .
.. . ..~.
.
. t ... ..., ......
.... ~~.-,.... ,. ' ..... ,....
_...._..-~~__ ~~........ ...... .
l~
1•' • ~i
-- .~ tJ
NOW, TIiEFcE':~~RCo i3E IT RESOLVED thet the Anaheim City Plaaning Commission does keroby cernmmend
to the City Council <.; ija~ City ~>.f Aneheim thet subject Petition for RedessiHcatioa be approved and, by so Aoing,
that Title i&Zonir,g oE the Anahti;a Municipal CodP be amended to exclude the above described property fmm the
R-1, One-Famiiy Resident.tal; Zone, and C-1, Neighborhood Commercial, Zone, and to incorporat•z
said described property int:c the C-0, Commer.cial Office, Zone, upon the following conditions
which are hereby found i:v ne a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject property
in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of ++~~ citizens of the City of Anaheim,
1. That th2 completion of these reclassification proceedings is contingent upon the
granting of a variance.
2a That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of
land 32 feet in width, from the center line of the streat, along Crescent Avenuey for
street widening purposes.
3o That Condition Noo 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a per:iod of
180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant.
4. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and
.specifications on file wit}i the City of Anaheim, marked "Exhibit Nos. 1 thru 6", and in
accordance with all provisions of the C-0, Commercial Office, Zoneo
5o That access ri9hts to Fairhaven Street shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim.
TFIE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is eigned end epproved by me this 16th f January~ 1964e
. ~
. CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY P N ING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
.~L~~2~~~
SECRE;TARY ANAHEIM CITY P~.ANNING COMMISSION
STA~'! "s OF CALIFORNIA )
COiStQTY CF ~R~1NGE ) as,
CITY' OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs~ Secretery of the City Planning Commiasion of the City of Moheim, do heceby certify thet the fore-
going resolutio~ wes passed end edopted et a meeting of the City Plenning Commisaion of the City of Meheim, held on
Ta~~uary 6~ 1964~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M„ by the following vote oE the membera thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred9 Camp, Gauer, Mungall9 Pebley, Perry, Rowland~
!~LSi.S: COMMiSSIONERS: Chavose
ABSEN'r: COMMISSIONERS: Sides.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. I heve here.mto set my hend this 16th day of January~ 1964.
RESOLUTION NO. 1019 '
R2-A
~~~
CFf`DFTpRV 11N~1NFiU f iTV A]~P.NFIING COM1N?SS?OI~I
-2-
r ~
,
;
;
;
~
a
-.- ... __ _-_.~