PC 1963-1964-1039;
r
~~ =~' °'' ' •
v o.~,~.~~,:~ _
~ - . __. ._'
. ~------
N
+o.
~
RESOLUTION NO. 1039, SERIES 1963-64
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENUING TO THE •CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64-76 gE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive a vedfied Petition for Reclessifica-
tionfrom VILLA FONTAINE EIdfERPRISES, INCORPORATED, 3261 North Harbor.8oulevard, Fuller.ton,
California, Owner of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim,._C.ounty af
Orange, State of California, described as the North 226 feet of the West 5 acres of the.
NQx-th 18 acres of the East 30 acres of the Northeast quarter. o£ the.Northwest.quarter of
Section 13, Township ~3 South, Range 11 Westo So B. Bo 8 Mo; Excepting ther.efxom the_IVortli
66 feet as conveyed to the State of California by deed recorded October 15, 1956 in Book
3575, page 56 of Official Records
; and
,~ ~
i
~ i
i;
i
i
'
+i a
:~ i
1~
a
; I
~; ~
I
.i
i
:j
~J
J
..;
:i
~,
=,:~
:,
i
:~ .
~
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commissiort did hold e public hearing et the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
February 3~ 1964~ at 2:00 o'c.lock P.M. notice of said public hearing having been duly given es cequired by
law end in eccocdance with the provisions of the Maheim Municipel Code, Chepter 18.72, to hear and consider evidence
for and' ageinst said pioposed ceclassificetion and to investigete and meke findings end recommendations in connection
thecewith; and _
WHEREAS, seid Commiasion, after due inspection, investigatlon, and study made b;~ itself end in ita behalE, and
e$er due coasideration of ell evidence and repods offeced at seid hearing, does find end determine the folloming fects:
' 1. Thet the petitioner proposes a reclessification of the ebove described property from the R-3~ Multiple Family
Residential, Zone to the C-1, Neighborhood Commercial, Zone to construct two commericai
buildingso
2. Thet the proposed reclassificetion of aubject property is necessary end/or desireble for the orderly and pra
per development of the community.
3. That the proposed reclassificetion of subject propeety does properly celete to the zones and their permitted
uses locelly estebliahed in close proximity to aubject p:operty and to the zones end their permitted uses gene:ally esteb-
lished throughout the community.
4, That the proposed reclassification of subject property does not require dedication for '
and standard improvement of abutting streets because said property does relate to and abut upon
streets and highways which are improved to carry the type and quantity of traffic, which will
be generated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation element of the General
Plan.
5. That the petitioner stipulated that a 6-fuot masonry wall would be constructed on the
south property line, except across the access drive, and on the east and west property line.
6. That the petitioner stipulated that a s3yn would be posted at the entrance of the
private access drive which would indicate "This is a Private Street"a
7, That no one appeared fn opposition to subject petitiono
Rl-A
-1-
:r,..;_
;, ~
1 ~ ...~ ~ ~ ~~,~~ ~ ~
_L ~
` ~ ~.
~ y~' ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Aneheim City PlennIng Commission does hereby recommend
to the Ciry Council of the City of Anaheim that aubject Petition for Reclessification be appioved end, by, so doing,
thet Title 1&Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be nmended to exclade the above described property from the
R-3, Multiple.Family Residential, Zone, and to incorporate said described property into the
C-1, Neighborhood Commercial, Zone, upon the foliowing cor.ditio4s which are hereby found to
~ be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of sub,ject property in order to preserve the
safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim<
~ lo That trash storage areas shall be nrovided in accordance with approved plans on file
~ in the office of the Director of Public Works9 prior to final building inspectiono
2~ That the owners of subject property sha11 pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢
~~ per front foot zlong Lir,coln Arrenue, for tree planting purposeso
3o That Condition Noo 2, above mentionedy sha11 be complied with within a period of 180
W days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may granto
4, That subject property sha11 be developed substantially in accordance with plans and
specifications on f ile with the City of Anaheim, marked "Exhibit Noso 1 throu~h 3"0
5. That all air-conditioning f acilities shall be properiy shielded from view from
• abutting streetso
bo That'all landscaping indicated on Exhibit Noo 1 shall be provided and maintainedy that
plans for said landscaping shall be submitted to and approved by the Superintendent of Parkway
Maintenance; and that said landscaping shall be installed prior to final building inspectiono
7o That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the south property line except
across the access drive9 and on the west and east pro~erty 1ir.es, prier te f:nal buildiag
inspectiono .
8. That a sign shall be posted at the entrance of the private drivey said drive providing
access from Lincoln Avenue to the multiple family development to the rear of the proposed
commercial developmenty and that said sign shall read "This is a Pr£vate Street"e
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is ql.~ned end nrpmy~r~ by me this 13 y of Februar 1964
ATTEST:
y, ~
r ~
r"~~AI~;2MAN E.~TpHEIM CITY P NING COMMISSION
' i ='~ i
;~ ~ ` ~ /
4 SECE"~-'TA~Y t1ATAHEIM C1TY P1tANt,~1IV'u cUMMISSioN
,
;~ STATE OF CbLi~'°~iIA )
COUNTY CF O,RAt~~~~ j as.
; ~ CITY OF ANAH~llM j
~ I~ Ann Krebs ~ Secretery of the City Planning Commission of the City of Maheim, do hereby certify thet the fore-
going resolution wes pasaed end edopted at e meeting of the City Plenning Commiesion of the City of Anaheim, held on
:~ February 3~ 1964~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof;
~ AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALlredy Camp, Gauer9.Mungall, Perry, Rowlandn
;
=~ I NOES: CaMMISSIONERS: ~avos„
~ Peble Sides.
`1 AHSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Yv
I
~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend this 13th day of February~ 19640
~i
`=~ % , .
' I .~
'' SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMM~SSiOtq
~ ~ RESOLUTION NO. 1039 '
~ i
~
,.j i R2_A ~2~
' - - ---- .. _ - - _ _
_ --i,- , ~