PC 1963-1964-1051,,
A f?ESOLUTION OF TE~ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAE~IM THAT
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENf N0. 7 BE.DISAPPROVED
~
i
i
WHEREAS, i;he City Council of the City of Anaheim.did_adop.t a.Genexal ..._
~ Plan by Resolution Noo 63R-869, sliowing the general description.and...extent.of
~ Tand uses within the City and indicating the present belief of the Council as
to possible future development and redevelopment of land within the.City;. and
1 WE~REAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did re-
ceive a verified Petition for Reclassification No. 63-64-84, which petition has
implications on pqlicies as expressed on said General Plan; and
~ WI-IEREAS, in conjuncti.on with the notice of the hearing on said reclass-
ifications notice was also given regarding the consideration of an amendment to
; t}~e General Plan in the ganeral location and vicinity of subject property of said
"~~"ieclassiF?~~ation; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the
City Hall in the City of Anaheim on February 3, '1964, at 2:00 o'clock P.Mo,
notice of said public hearing having been duly given as re.quired by law and in .
~accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, to hear and consider
evidenoe for and against said Amendment to the Geneial Plan and said proposed
Petition for Reclassification to investigate and r~ake firidings and recommendations
- in connection therewith; and ~
WHEREAS, said Commission after due inspection~ investigation, and study
~ made by i'tself and in its behalf and after due consideration of all evidence and
~ reports offered at said hearing, DOES HERERY FIND
~
1. That the present general description and extent of land uses in the
aforementioned area adequately represents past and current Gity
policies regarding possible future development of said general areae
2. That no evidence was presented at said hearing which would justify
the City Plannin; Commission recommending a change in the above-
mentioned policies to the City Council.
~ 3. That Exhibit No. 1 of General Plan Amendment No. 7 does not consti-
r tute an acceptable alternative to current palicies as illustrated•
~ on the General Plane
`
-- ~`.• ;,
,.
~' , . . .: ,~ _.-"-- . ~- .
.~; .,~_~.'--.....__.---~-~_.._..--'---. ..__._
~' ..__._ . .
i ;~ ~ ~: ~
~,
. :_:----
.. ~,,., . .
.i
'4 ~ ~ l ,
z.~' ,~
~
;;`
~~
;,
,~.
+' IvUW, THEREbURE, BE IT RESOLVID that the City Planninc} Commission of
the City of Anaheim does hereby recommend to the City Council of the City of
;': Anaheim that subject General P1an Amendment be disapproved on the basis of
C: the aforementioned findingss
THE FORL~OING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 13th day
ofi February, 1964.
, ? l~f.~~~~.~i,'.(~ ,
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIP4 CITY NNING QOMMISSION
ATTESTs
SECRETARY ANAHEIM'CITY PLANNING OOMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
ODUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF AN~IHEIM )
~
I; Ann Kr?bs; $~C,ret~r~ ~f ±he rit~ Plannir.g Commission of the City of Anaheim,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a
meeting of the City Planning Commission of th~ City of Anaheim, held on February
3, 1964 at 2~OQ o'clock PoMo, by the following vote of the members thereofs
AY$S: W6IMISSIONERSa Allred, Camp, Chavos9 Mungall, Pebley, Perry, Rowlanda
NOESt OOMMISSIONERSt None.
ABSENTs ODMMISSIONERSs ~auer, Sides.
IN V~ITNESS WHEREOF9 I have hereunto set my hand this 13th day of
February, 1964.
/~:~r~-~
SECREfARY ANAHEIM CITY PLAN~iING OOMMISSION
f
~
~
~. . ~.__. ..
_~ ,
~
i
,
j
~
1