PC 1963-1964-1064~r_~
~~~
?~::
RESOLUTION N0. 1064y SERTES 1963-64 ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNIIQG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
TFIAT PETITIONi FOR VARIANCE N0. 1620 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did ceceive a verifled Petition for Veriance
from LUSK CORPORATION, Box 1217 Perry.Annex, Whittier, California, Owner'; WILLIAM Do LUSK,
Box 1217 Perry.Annsx, Whittier, California, Agent of cartain real property situated in the
City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as Lots Nos. 5 through
48 of Tract Noo 4689
; ead
WHEREAS, f}~e City Plenning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hell in the City of Anaheim
on February 17y 1964~ et 2:00 o'clack P.M., notice of said public headn~ heving been duly given as required
by law end in accordance witfi ate proviaiu~i3 cf :~e :.:a.`•e:r: I:4"-"--=?Fp~ rt+de; Chaoter 18.68, to hear end conslder
evidence for end egeinst said ptcposed verience end to investigste end meke findings and recommendations in c~nnec-
tion therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commassioia, efter due inapection, investigatlon, and study made by itself end in its behalf,
and efter due consideration of ell evidence end :eports offered es said heering, does find end detera:ine the following
fQCtS.
1. '1'nai irte pe[iii~ner ~eyiu=3.o ~~:.::w•^-~ ~~="~ rwa A~~hnim Municinal Code: SeCtion 18 0 240 030(1-a~9
which requires'front yards not less than 25 feet in the R-ly One Family Residential, ~one
to permit a reduction of the required front y: setback on Tract Noo 4689~
2. Thet tfie:e ere exceptionel or ext:aosdinary ciccumstences or conditiona eppHceble to the property involved
or to the intertded use of the p~opecty that c?o not apply generally to the property or class of use in the seme vicinity
and zone.
3. Thet the cequested variatsce is necessary for the pceservation and enjoyment of e substantial pmperty right
poasessod by othec p~opedy in ifie same vicinity end zone, end denied to the pmperty in question.
4. Tha4 the requested vaxiance will not be materially 9etrimenfel 4o the public welfete or injurioua to fl~e pmn-
edy or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the pmperty is located.
~ 5. That no one appeared in opposition to subject pe±itiono
Vi-G ~
i
;
i
j
'~
'-a
;~i.':
i
`_.~ ~ ~~
. • t ~r
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Planning Commission doea hereby geant subject
Petition far Varieace, upca the following cortditions which are heceby found to be a necessery precequisite to the pro-
poaed use of the subject p:opecty in osder to preserve the cafetiy end general welfere of the Citizens of the City oi ,
Meheim.
la That sub3ect property shall be developed substantially in accordance with p2ans
and specifications on~file wi•th the City of Anaheim,marked Exhibit Noso.l, 2, and 30 '.
~~a..' _'
1[ _ . ~
; ';~
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end eppcoved by me this ~2 y of February~ 1964e ~ ~
a~~~~~~~ n /7 :
. ~ ~~ ~ ~
CIiAYRNIAi1 lsNAHEI~Yi CITY L NING COMMISSION :~
ATTEST: '
i ~
~e~~~z~/~y~z~/ ' ;
S~CRETARY RNAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORAIIA ) ' ~
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. '
CITY OF AN+IHEIM ) '
, ~
I~ Ann Krebs9 Secretery of the Cixy Planning Commission of the City of A~aheim, do hereby cettify that the fore- j
going teaolutiou was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Plenning Commiss3on ofthe City of Anaheim, held on .
February 17~ 19u4~ t:t 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the membeca thereof: j
AYES: CONIMISSIONERS:.Al1rEd, Chavos.,.Gauer, Mungall, Pebley, Perry, Rowland.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Noneo i
AHSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Camp, Sideso
IN WITNFSS 1YHEREOF, I have he:eunio set my hand this 27th day i~f February~ 19640 ~
r!~ ' ~
--a -+L9S~.(d~`'''
SECRETAR'Y ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COhiMISSION i ~
RESOLUTION N0. 1064 : ~
v2-G .2. S
'~
. ~
7 ~
A
. ~ ~
~ . ~ ~ ,.. . . ~ ~~~ ..~
, . . . . . ~ ~ , ~, .. ~ ' ,. .. . ~ . . ~ . . :~ ~
~
~
~. ...._:. ___
, ~