PC 1963-1964-1070.._. .,,~
~ ~
;
~
RESOLUTION N0. 1070, SERIES 1963-64
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF !~NAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 63-64-82 HE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Planniag Cammission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Reclassifica-
tionfrom VICTOR BALDERHAUSEN, 531 South Harbor Boulevard, Anaheim, Califorr.ia, Q,vner;
.<': CEDRIC A..,WHITE, JR., 125 South Claudina Stxeet, Anaheim, California, Agent of certain
` real•property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
~=`", as.described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referred to herein as though set forth
„ in full
~; • ; and
' WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public hearing et the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
i;., February 17~ 1964~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of said public hearing having been duly given es reyuired by
z law and in accordance with the provisions of the Meheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.72, to hear and cansider evidence
~~ for and against said pioposed reclassification and to investigete and make findings end recommendetions in connection
~~ there:aith; and
,.
j WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, end study made by itself and in its behalf, and
;i after due consideretion of all evidence end cepods ~ffered 'at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
.s:~
;-~ 1. That the petitioner proposes a reclassification of the above described property from the R-1~ One Family
? Residential, 2one to the C-1, Neighborhood Commercial, Zone to establish a real estate
' appraisal office within an existinting residence.
~~ 2. That C-0, Commercial Office, Zone is deemed a more compatible zone, in view of
`~ the location of .subject property witkiin the proposed civic district.
;
.• Thet the proposed reclassification of subject property is necessary and/or desirable for the orderly and pro- j
per development of the community. ~
4• Thet the proposed reclassification of subject p:operty does properly relate to the zones and their pecmitted ~
uses locally established in close p:oximity to subject property end to tha zones and their permitted uses generally esteb- ~
lished throughout the community. ~
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does require dedication for ~
and standard impro~ement of abutting streets,.because said property does relate to and abut
upon streets and highways which are proposed to carry the type and quantity of traffic, which ~
will be generated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation element of the
General Plan.
6. That one person appeared and one letter was received in opposition to subject petition.}
;
;
,
Rl-A
,~;,
+-`S ;
(':.
~i.
4~•~ '
-1-
1
I
1
1
;.
T
'..iYr .....:.
' ..1 ~ ~`,
~ 'P'`...-
~
~
~ - ~~
,
_ ` ~ '~~
,"
~ ''~.4~.~ +. ~ \~
f
~~y'
ti ~ ~
" ~
~~\~
E`~l~!f
°
S ~
:'~ .~ .t
~
~ ' ;
:
`
v
`{;. ~
.. . ~ ~., .
;, ~
ir;' ,
?.'
--
___~_,>.. --- ----------- .,
---->~_.._.:_...._-.. _
_ _vv . ,,...... -'. ,,a~ ~ ~~ '
^ ' . ' . ~. d~fd~-~~~~ l~~, AA
.. ~i. ' ' . .
~ Orang~ Count,y7'itle Corrapany . . . ;
I
1 ' • I'
~ -. WA~IN 9T8EET AT fIFTH. 9ANTA 11NA, D1ILIFDNN111 ~ KIMBERLY 7•8E92
• . . Our No. . ~ ,
PRELIMINARY REPORT ~yg~ ~pw ppgppRpTION , '
~ ' ~ VESTEE:
i.'~ . 1I~C'10R J. BALDFRHAUSEbT s1Rd SiP~' SS: SAI~E~l1USE31~ 2tuaba~ etld 4a ~
~ .. . . .
`~ Tenents•~in ~o~unity. . ., ,.,. .~....,.W..,.....__:_.~..___.-__-- -------------
+ - ---._....,...,..,~.. ...,~~~:.. . _. .. .~
Issued fpr ISole Use o~~..• ~~~ ~IS ~~ . Yo~r No.
. . ptiA&ER~ID 'CALTFORNIA 6120 Fs , '
. . . '~ a~.~t~ a~a~ $LV~as ~ . 6.~ - G ~t -~ ~r
In connedion with~your application for a Policy of Title Insurance on the title'to the land hefeinafter described,
this report is issued as en acrommoda)ion;;and ts made without liability and without obligation•to issue such•Policy.
Statemant o4 ~haiges will be'rendered~:~nihen Policy is issued, or nfnety days frorfl eMry af app~ication, if Policy '
, is not issued prior to that time. ,.. , '
Dated as of ' at 8:00 ~A,M. OR/A~NGE UNTY TITLE COMPANY
. Decamb~ . - ~ // ,,~~f .
. , . ~ BY 4~ ~c~c.~- ~.y j .: ~.f~~h~,s
. RECLASS.. NO. ' ' TITLE OFfICER ~
. • ' . E'ARL D. l~AY1 li
~-..~~.~~..:~..,,...,-~.r,~.....,_._ ------, _ _
_--- -..- _..._____ ~, ._.._ - --.
. `-.. 3 . ,
~` : ^+-: , • , ' , ' : • ' ,--1 • . , '
. '+ , ... . . • . . . . .. ;
' • ; ; , 8510~5 ' ~
, • .. . . • i
~ :2itora±e~ ~ASS~~1Ued as S~llox8t , ~ , . .' ~ ~
~$eBi~miag }~.t a~oiat 144.75 t~t Weeterly~ mee~u='od r-~ s3g~Zt ab3lee'~roz~t t,l~s' i
momuv~xs~ed center' lia~ oY ~Sou'Lh Pralm Strea~ a~ci 38.25 feert garthorly, meaaure8 at•. ..' '
Y
r.itxZ-~L araBl,es Pram tho ~aom~ent~ed coates ].ino ot Wea~ Water 6br@et~ thesu~ Norther~y ' ,
para2.1~e1 vith said eenter lia~ oY South Pnlw Stree'~ 5l.8.25 Peet to t}~ ~oxthar3,Y •.. •, (
ar •
~' lirie ur Ia~apartY. conveyrsd to Jo$ep~ Lao Heia~a, by deed s~ac~led Avauat 23~ 1938, ,
in Doo.'s 3A08~ ~ 174~ oP OP~iaisl Racozdee in tha •ofPice o! *1ab Couat~Y RaccrBer oR ,, ''. I
eafd.Ora~ge CauntYi t~e~c~ Dastac;ty•~l.on8 the Nortltcx],y 11ao o~ 4~ l~~'~'~Y ~~3^~ ~ ~
~ • by naid drsad ~o a poi.~xt 54~.75 fe~rC Wactarly at ri8ht ar~gl~s Sra~ t$e momu~ntte3 cez-ter': . ,. ~
3.iz~ of South Pa~m Stre~t1 ~a ~'n~t}xe~ly a1o~ e~ lin~ par~11~1 't~ said asornnmez~ted
Cesit,ar lima oY South Palm Sti~eet 5]$.iS i'eet, IIw~e or le8s to Et po~.rit ia~ a~1aa 38.23
• Zea~ HarEbc~xly- msosureA at rlght a~,~glos,tttim- tho~.x~nsmaizted eeast~r line ot W~ Water ' ~ ~
St,re~e~; mhich ~.ine i0 ~ 14os~ther]3-. ],laa. oP Wast LT~t~r Stxe~b, as S3xsa by' 4,hab'
certain 'deod recoade8 J~'~v~erY 8, 1927 in boole 10~ ~&So 81 0~ OPYicisl Reeo~d8a iYt ths, .
` o~43ce ot tbo CouatY Itecartis~r oi' saSd Oraag~a Co. •.u~tyy thc3ncts W~sLeQ'e'],y' e1~os~8 e~id ,'
~ortherly li~a oP ~1eat idat~m~. St~'C Il~ fe~rC to tbs yoin~t ot be~agf .
o~~ ,
sxxccey~Cin~ fram ansst ~C~xth 171.ZS ~e~a ~tue T~- u4.2s t~6 tbsa~oP. ~~~~ Sf -~ ,
> . .a
~ . d..d..a ~ ~ . , , . ~ . •~ .. ~
f , • . , . . . . .. .. _ - _ . . ... . , ' /.
# ~.
~ ( F3~i 7~K ' . , ' ~ . .
.
,~ . ,
~ ------- -~- -~ - . . -. . _ ..
,.
~
~ . _ -~~ ..
~
~
. _-_~
i
I~ ~~~
- `~' ~ ~~~~
' 1~~ .
_ . '
.. '
"4 ;
~ .. ~~
t
NOW, TIiEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thgt the Anaheim City Pleaaing Commission does heceby cecommend
~to the City Council of the City of Aneheim thet subject Petition foc Reciassification be approved end, liy so doing,
thet Title 1&Zoning of the Aneheim Municipal Code be emended to exclude the ebove descrlbed properry from the
R-1, One-Family Residential, Zone, and to inconpoxate said described pr.operty into the
C~O, COMMERCIAL OFFICE, Zone, upon the foilowing conditions which are hereby found
to.:be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject property in order to preserve
the safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
1. That subject property shall be developed in accordance with all provisions and
conditions of Area Developme7t Pl.an No. 2, and in accordance with all provisions of the
C-0, Commerical Office, Zone, as amended, prior to the reclassification of subject property.
2. That the petitioner shall be granted temporary access to Harbor Boulevard by
extending the existing driveway to the existing alley, such temporary access shall be dis-
continued when the alley is improved. .
3. That all accessory buildings shall be removed, and the rear of the property be
improved.for parking purposes, prior to final building inspection.
4. That this Reclassification of subject property is contingent upon the granting of
~Conditional Use Permit Noo 5400
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end epproved by me this "27 of February~ 1964.
, • /
, CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PL ING COAiMISSION
ATTEST:
~~.~~~yEy 2~iL~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY P'':ANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY CF OR~NGE ) s..
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs~ Secretery of the City Planning Commission of the City of Mahclm, do hereby cectify that the foce-
going resolution wes passed and adopted et a meeting of the City Planning Commission ofthe City of Aneheim, held on
February 17~ 1964~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of ttie membera thereof;
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred; ~au=r, Mungall, Pebley, Perry, Rowland.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Chavos.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Camp, Sides.
IN WITNESS WH~REOF, I have hereunto set my head this 27th day of February~ 1964.
RESOLUTION NO. 1U70 '
R2-A
~~!/Y(/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIIIG COMMISSION
_y..
t~
'
;_ '
~' I
!
- - ""_;"* I
~ _ ....
.. . ~ ~