Loading...
PC 1963-1964-1081A RE90LUTION ~F THE CITY PLANNING 9WMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REOOMMENDING TO THE CITY ODUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT GENERAL_ PLAN . Al~IEt1i~NT N~ 0 8 BE DISAPPROVID. . WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim did adopt a General Plan by ; Resolution.No. 63R-869, showing the general description and extent of land uses within the City and.indicating the.present belief of the Council as to possible future development and redevelopmen#.of land within the.City; and i WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Maheim did receive a verified ~ Petition for Reclassif.icatiure Noo 63-64-79„ which petition has implications on policies ~ as expressed_.on said Gener.al Plan ; and ; WHEREAS9 in conjunction with the notice of the hearing on said reclassification, notice was given regarding the consideration of an amendment to the General Plan in the ~ general.location and vicinity of sub~ect property of said reclassification; and , WHERFAS~ THE CITY PLANNING O~MMISSION did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on March 2, 1964, at 2s00 0' clock PoMoq, notice of said public hearing ha~ing been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Maheim Municipal Code9 to hear and consider evidence for and against said Amendment to the General Plan and said proposed Petition for Reclassif ication to investigate ~ and made findings and recommendations in connect~on therewith; and WHEREAS9 said Commission after due inspection, investigation, and study made by ; itself and in its behalf and after due considera•tion of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, D(lES. HEREflY FIND la That the present yeneral description and extent of land uses in the aforementioned area adequately represents past and current City policies regarding possible future development of said general area. 2~ That no evidence was psesented at said hearing which would justify the , City Planning Commission r~commandina a change in the abovementioned policies to the City Council~ 3a That Exhibit No~ 1 of General Plan Amen~ment No~ 8 does not constitute an acceptable alternative to current policies as illustrated on the General Plan. ~ 1 j`, ~~', `=:. 1.4 r`: ~. r: r.. 1 ~ ~' . , , ~'`. ~. 1 _ . ., _ ._. ~ . ~ . ` ~ ~ ) ~ ~: . , ~ NOW, THFI~ER~RE~ BE IT RESOLVED that the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim doas hereby recommend to the City Council of the City of.Anaheim that subje,t General.Plan..Amendment be disapproved on the basis of the aforementioned findings. THE F~R&30ING RESOLUTION is signed and approv me this 12 day of March, 1964. ~ ~HAIRMA ANAHEIM CITY P NING Q~MMISSION ATTEST: - / Y~~~~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING ~MMISSION STATE OF CALIFDRNIA ) ~UNTY OF ORANGE ) sso CITY OF ANAHEIM. ) I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim do hereby certify that the foregoing resalution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commissicn of the City of Anaheim, held or March 2, 1964, at 2a00 o'clock p.m., by the following vote of the members thereofa AY&Sa GOMMISSIONERS~ Allred9 Camp, Chavos, Mungall, Pebley, Rowland, Sides. NO~Sa QDkMI&SIQI~Et3Se PIon2. ABSENTe COMMI3SI~NERSg Gauer, Perry. IN WITNESS 1"h?ERIDFy I have hereunto set my hand this 12th day of March, 1964. /9~~l.C~f.~.e~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING OOMMISSION Resolution No. 1U81 -2- _ . . ~ ~ f :, _ , --.- __„ _ __ .-- --.. --- _ __._ ~,~- _ _ _ __ __- _.__. ---..___w. . "t ; s , ..,.._.,.. _. ~.___ ,ry. ~ r ._`__ _.' ~ .. . ~