PC 1963-1964-1158S,_~
RESOLUTION-NO. 1158, SERIES 1963-6~'
A RESOLUTTaN OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE pEI2MIT NO. 568 gE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Pletining Commission of the City of Anaheio dld receive a verified Petition for C:oaditionel
Use Pe:mitfrom HUGH B. SPRAGUE, 757 North East Street, Anaheim, California, and•?.EONARD Le
EGGLESTON, 755 Narth East Street, Anaheim, California, Owners; E. L. BENSON, 1803 North Old Tustin
Road, Santa Ana, California, Agent of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County
of Orange, State of Cali:cr~ia, desc: ~ed as b~ginning at a~oint 80 feet Sputherly from the North-
east corner of Vineyard Lot A-1, as per mep thereof recorded in book 4, pages 629 and 630, Deeds,
Records of Los Angeles County; running thence Nlesterly parallel with the Norther~y line of saidlot,
164 feet; thence Southerly parallel with the Easterly line of said lot, 75 feet; thence Easterly
parallel ~vith the Northerly line o: said lot, 16d feet; thence Northerly 75 feet to the point of
beginning; ALSO, beginning at the Northeast corner of Vineyard Lot "A1", as shown on a map record-
ed in book 4, pages 629 and 630, Deeds, records of said Los Angeles County, running thence Westerly
along the Northerly line of said lot, 164 feet; thence Southerly parallel with the Easterly line of
said lot, 80 feet; thence Easterly parallel with the Northerly line of said lot, ;and
164 feet, and thence Northerly to the point of beginning
WHEF.EAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a gublic h~srino at the City Hell in the City of Anaheim on
May 11 ~ 1964 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearing hnving bec~ duly given as requiced by
lew end ia accocdaace with the provisions of the Anaheim Munidpal Code, Cheptea 18:64, to heaz end consider evidence
for and against said pcoposed rnnditioaal use aad to investigete aad make findings end cecommendations in connectIon
therewith; end '
WHEREAS, aeid Commission, after due inspection, investigetion, end study mede by itself end in its behalf,
and after due consideration of ell evldence ead reporQs o;rored at seid hearing, does find and detecmine the foU.owing fac,ts:
1. That the proposed use is pcoperly one for which a Conditionel Use Permit is authorized Uy this Code, to wit:
establish a service station on subject propertye
2o Tha+. the proposed use will adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth
and development of the area in which it is proposed to be locatedo
3o That, although two servic~e st~-tions have b~en approved near subject property, these
service stations are located at the intersection of two arterial highways, namely La Palma
Avenue and East S1;reet~ that sub~eat property is located at the intersection of a local street
and an arterial highway and further, that North Street should be used as the southerly
boundary of commercial development at the La Palma Avenue and East Street intersectiono
4o That the significance of North Street, n~w functioning as an arterial hgihway, will
be substantially altered when La Plama Avenue is extended westerly from East Street across
the railroad right-of-way, particularly if the Public Utilities Cormnission requires the closing
of North Street across the railroad right-of-way.
5o That no o~e appeared in oppositian to subject petitiuno
~
~ ~
i ~
1
~-. .
.~
~ - : " ,,
,, - (,_ ? {~-'€
NOW,.THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Aneheim City Planning Commission does hereby deny subject
Petition foi Conditionel Use Permit on the besis of the afocementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me,this 21 of May~ 1964.
CHAIR1dAN ANAHEIM CITY PL G COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) 3e•
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs.~gectetary oE the City Pianaing Commisssion of the City of f+neheim, do he~eby certify thet the foce-
going resolution was passed and edopted at a meeting of the Ciry Planning Commiasion of the City of Aneheim, held on
May 11 ~ 1964~ , et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the membets the:eof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS;Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Mungall, Perry, Rowland.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Noneo
'ABSENT: COfdMISSIONERS: Pebley, Sides.
YN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have he~eunto set my hend this 21st day of May, 1964.
L/L/1~G~t/ ...~~~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMtAISSION
RESOLUTIOId NO. 1158
C2-D
-.^r
,,,- ~
,. _..- ; ~.--_-r.._.,+~~w„
~
~E ~
~
~
; ~
; •
.~
3
;f ~
~
a
1i~ ~
;~
_ __,ii