PC 1963-1964-1164('"i
~ K
` i"
~
~ - __ ~;c;.~
~
RESOLUTION N0. 1164~ SERIES 1963-64
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 1635 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commiss:on of the City of Maheim did receive e verified Petition for Vadaace
from NELSON E. ENDICOTT, 3521 Savanna Drive, Anaheim, California, Owner of certain real
property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described
as Lot No. 13 of Tract Noo 743
; end
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a pablic liearing nt the City Hall in the City of Aneheim
on May 11 ~ 1964, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing heving been duly given es cequired
by law end in accordance with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipel Code, Chepter 18.68,to heer snd consider
evidence for end egeinst seid proposed varience end to inves~igete and meke findings and recommendetions in connec-
tion theeewith; end
WHEREAS, seid Commission, efter due inspecUon, investigation, aad study made by itself and in ita behalf,
and efter due considereiion of ell evidence and repods offered es seid headng, does find end detecmine the following
fects:
1. Thet the petitioner requests e veriance from the Aneheim Munlctpel Code: Section 18 160030(4-a and 4-b~
whlch sequires that an R-A parcel shall have not less than one acre, and a mir~imum lot width
of 55 feet to areate two R-A parcels of less than one acre each in area and one lot 52>65
feet wide on sub3ect propertyo
2. Thet thece aie exceptional or extreordinery circumstences or conditiona appliceble to the property involved
or to the intended use of the property thet do not apply generelly to the property or cleas oE use in the seme vicinity
end zone.
3. Thet the requested varlance is necessery for the Areservation end enjoyment of e substential property right
poasessed by other pcoperty in the seme vicinity and zone, end denied to the ptopedy in questlon.
4. That the requested verience will not be meterially detrimental to the publlc welfete or injurious to the pmp-
erty or improvements in such vicinity end zone in which the pioperty is located.
5o That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition~
Vi-G '1'
, } {~ )
=~. ~ _
- ,*
,~
NOW, THEI2EFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that tiie Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby gtent subject
Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which ece hereby found 4o be e necessary prerequisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject property in o:der to preserve the sefety and generel welfere of the Citiiens of the City of
Anaheim. '
le That~the owner of subject ~roperty shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land
32-f~et in W3dth, from the- ce~r±pr ? zne- of-the~ street•. alono.. Savanna Stxeet,.. for stxeet wideRing !
purposes•,
2a That street.improvement plarrs shall..be-prepared•anct a21-engineerir~g requi.rements of ,
t~e Ci~ of ~lnahe3rrr alor,y Savanrta Street, such .as.:c~ubs-arid~ gutters•; sidew~lks, street grading
and paving,.drai~age facilities, or other appurtenant work snall be.comRle~e3 as requirad by
the Git Ertg'neer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office ~'
of •~the ~t~y~~gineerS ~anct-that~ a bond-in -an ~amourtt and• farnr satisfactary~ta• th~ City of•:Anaheim :
may be~posted with ti~e City to guarantee the installation of sa~d engineering re.quirements.
3o That the owner of sub ect roperty shali pay to the City of Mahaim the sun. of $2.00
per front foot, along Savanna ~tree~, for street ligi~ting purposes.
4. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15~
per front foot along-Savanna Street;.for.tree..planting.pur~oseso
5e That a Record of Survey to record the approved division of subject propert~ be record-
ed in the effice of the Orange County Recorder.
6. That Conditiort Nos> 1 2,.39,Q9.and 5, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior
to the time that the-Building ~ermit is issued_or within a.period of 180 days from date-hereof,
whicherrer occurs- first, or such further .time. as the Co~issi~n may granto
7o That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and
speci~ications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit No. 1.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me this 2 ' y of May~ 1964.
CLiA1R14tAN R,NAHEIM CITY P NING COMMISSION
ATTEST: ,
~
~~.~C~' ~'' ` `.~/ - ~
SECRETAR"r AIwAHEIM CITY PLt~wTj;Tjjpl, ,~MMG55SYoN
STATE OF C£iLIFORNIM )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) as.
C1TY OF ANAHEIM )
Iy Ann Krebs~ Seceeeery of t~e City plenr.l~g Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby cedify thet the foce-
going resolutlon wea pasaed end edopted at a meeling of the CIty Planning Commission ofthe City of Anaheim, held on
Mdy 11 ~ 1964 ~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members theceoE:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred•,. Camp, . Chavns~...Gauer, . Mungall, Perry, Rowlando
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Nnne.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Pebley, Sides.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have heceunto set my hand this 21st day of May~ 1964e
RESOLUTION N0. 1164
!
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CI i'Y Pii+NA1I'riG COlhiriYSSION
V2-G -2-
:l
~ a
t J
~ ~
~
` ~
~ ~
1 ~
'. ~
, ~
i ;
t :
7 ,
s'
' ~
~.
t
ti ---i