PC 1964-1965-1277;~
RESOLUTION ND. 12'77a Series 1964-65
A RE90LlffION QF TNE ~ITY PLANNING CAMMISSIOt~-OF TFiE CITY OF ANAHEIM
E~MMEtmII~ TO TI~ CITY COUNC:L OF THE CITY OF ANAHQAI THAT
GENFRAL PLAN NdF.NQbI~~IT 1~. 28 BE APPAOV~U
MHFREAS, the City Council of the City of Maheim did adopt a General Plan by
Rasolution Ho. 63R-869, shoxing the general description and extent of land uses
within the City and indicating the present belief of the Council as to possible future
developmant and.~>devalcpment of land within the City~ and
1~HEREAS, the City Planning Com~ission of the City of Anaheim did receive a
Yerifled Petition for.Conditional Use Permit No. 596, which petttion has implications
on policias as expressed on said Gene:~al Planf and
111~RF.AS, in conjunction with the notice of the hearing on said conditional use
permit, notice was also given regarding the consideration of an amendment to the
General Plan in the qeneral locatfon and v:c:nity of subject property of said conditional
use permit; and
MF~REAS, the City Plaaning Co~nission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall
in the City of Mah~im on July 20, 1964, at 2i00 PoMe, notice of said public hearing
having been duly given as required by law and in accordancu with the provisions of
the Maheim Ilunicipal Coda, to hear and consider evidence for and against said amend-
ment to the General Plan and said proposed Petition for Conditional Use Permit to
investigate and make findings. and recomnendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Co~ission after due inspection, investigation, and study made
by itself and in its behalf and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, DOES F~REBY FII~
1. That evidence was presented at said hearing which justifies the City
Planning Commission's recommending to the City Council a change in
the present general description and extent of land uses in the
aforementioned area, extending from the present Commercial Recreation
Area eoutherly botmdary to 660 feet south of Jrangewood .rvenue the
weIIterly boundary be'.ng the east side of Harbor Boulevard.
2. That the Commission deecs it advisable to extPnd *hP Comnercial Recreation
Area as illustrated in Fxhibit "A" because the proposed use approved under
Conditional Use Perroit No. 596 due to its proximity to the proposed conver.tion
facilities located approximatel~ one-quarter of a mile northerly, constitutes
a logical extension of said Area.
3. That $xhibit "A" of General Plan Amendment No. 28 does constitute a~
acceptable alternative to current policies as illustrated on the General
Plan.
AAW~ TI~REPORE~ L~E.IT RE90LVID that the :.:ty Planning Commission of the
City of Ma`le3m does hereby recommend to the City Council of the City of Anaheim
that subje~t General Plaa Amendment be approved on the basis of the aforemo:~tioned
findinga and in accordance with Exhibit "A"~
1964.
THE FORHiOING RESOLUfION is signed and approved ~~~ me this 30th day of July,
ATTEST~
~ y~~
SBCRQARY ANAHEIk CITY PLANNING CUI~IiIISSION
STA7E OF CALIf~RNIA )
COUNfY OF ORANGE ) sa.
CITY OF ANAHEIY. )
I, Mn Krebs, Secretary oi the City Planning Commission of the City of Maheim da
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution w~s passed and adopted at a meeting of the
City Planning Commission of the C:ty of Ar:ahe~~~, held on July 20, 1964, at 2~00 0'ciock
PoMo~ by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYESs COM9ulISSIONFRS~ ~~Ps ~avos, Gauer, Mungall, Perry, Rowland.
Pq$S: G~MMISSIONERSs None.
ABSFMs WWdISSIONIIt~ Allrad.
IN 1NITNFSS NfHF1t~F, I have hereunto set my hand this 30th day of July, 1964.
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMIMISSION
i
Rest 1277