PC 1964-1965-1337,~ _
~
l -) ; ~~
. .,
RE90LUTION I~p. 1337. Series 1964-F5
. A RESOLUfION OF THE CITY . PLANNING WI~MISS ION OE THE CITY OF ANAHIIId R~OlY1MENpING
TO THE CII'Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHQM THqT GENERAL PLAN NdENIDMEI1t' Pp, 38,
PApPOSIt~ THE EXTENSION At~ ALIGNMENT OF LA PAL1ilp aVENUE Tn THE CIRCULATION
E[.FJ~(ENt OF THE STREETS AI~ FIIGI~NAYS ON THE, GENERAL PLAN
No. 63R 869ASshowingitheC~eneral~description and extentdof landtusesewithinpthe City anduthen
Cipculation Element of Streets and Highways in the City of M aheim, and
WHFR'r.AS, notice was given regarding the consideration of an amenu>;,ent to the General
Plan in the general location and vicinity of the proposed extension an~i ~eneral alignment of
La Palma Avenue from its prasent easterly boundary at Jefferson Stre~t to Imperial Nighway, and
WHERFAS, the City.Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in
the.Cit~ of Anaheim on September 14, 1964, at 7c00 0'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing
having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim
1Nunicipal Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against said Amendment to the General
Plan and to investigate and make findings an~ reco~mnendations in connection therewith~ and
1Ni~REAS, the County Planning Co:-~nission has held public hearings on a precise alignment
of La Palma Avenue, k:ut has not made a dete.rmination of this precise alignment, and
1NHEREAS, the area being bisected by the proposed extension of La Palma Avenue has been
designated through the Northeast Industrial Areas Malysis and the General Plan as having the
best potential for industrial development, and
Wt~RFAB. said Commission after due iT-spection, investigation and study made by itself
and .in its behaYf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said
hearing, DOES HFRFBY FIIm~
1. That Alternative "A" as shown on Exhibit No. 1, proposing the extension and align-
,ment.of La Falma Avenue easterly from Jefferson Street to Imperial Highway is the
most acceptable and feasible alignment based nn engineering studi8s which indicate
it to bs less cost.ly. Futher, that it utilizes more existing right-of-way, is a more
direct route~ and that sanitary sewers will be less expensive because of the topog-
graphy.
2. That Alternatives "B", "C", and "D" were considered less feasible because of the
increased cost; the divieion of nmre small parcels, making them undevelopable as
individual parcels, and the traversing of a sand and gravel operation.
3. That all property owners in the area present at the public hearing expressed their
desire to develop their properties for industrial purposes and urged that an alignment
be.established as soon as possible, in order that the properties affected by the
extension and aliqnment might be developed.
4. ihat ele~en (11) property owners.appeared before the Commission urging the establish-
ment of the alignment and extension of La Palma Avenue, the majority exprossing their
preference for Alternative "A".
S..That the propcsed_General Plan Amendment is not a precise alignment study, nor is
there.an acquisition program-being.,proposed, but is necessary to clarify the City's
policy for necessary and adequate traffic circulation for the northeast industrial
area.
;---~ -_ - --_.____ __ _ _ _ __ ~
~
r 1 ( ~~
~
DAW, THEREFORE, HE IT RESOLVm that the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim
does hereby recommend to the City Council of the City of Maheim that the Circulation Element
of the General Plan be amended by the approval of General Plan Amendment No. 38, and the
adoption of Alternative "A", as shown on Exhibit No. 1, for the general aligr~ent and extension
of La Paltna Avenue easterly from Jefferson Street to Imperial Highway.
THE FOR~iOING RE90LUfI0N is signed and approved by me this 24th day of September, 1964.
AI7bST~
C~n.,n ~~ ~.1
SECREtARY QM CITY PL NG OOAN~IISSION ~
1
STATE OF CALIFURNIA )
ODUNfY OF ORANGE ) ss. 6
CITY OF ANAHIIk ) D
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Cortanission of the City of Maheim, do hereby ;
certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meetinq of the City Planning ~
Commission of the City of Maheim~ held nn September 14, 1964, at 7e00 G' clock P.M.~ by the i
following vote of the members thereof~ ~ ;
,
AYESt OOMMI3SIONERSt Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Perry. ~
~
I~qESs OOMMISSIONERSe None. ~
ABSENie ~MNISSIONERS: Mungall, Rowland. ~
a
IN WITNESS WHER~F, I have hereunto set my hand this 24th day of Se~tember, 1964.
~ ~
SECRII'AR~ANA IIIE CITY PLANN NG ~MMISSION
Resolution No. 1337
r_,,.~