PC 1964-1965-1361~,
~ 'Y
, _' J
` \
RESOLUiION AlOo 1361. Series 1964-b5
A BE~LUTION OF THE.CITY .PLANNI1~i ~bI11ISSI0N OF THE .CITY OF ANAHIIId
4tBWJOdF11DING TO THE CI?Y COiMCIL OF THE CI?Y OF ANp}-IIM THA?
GENERAL PLAN AlIEt~MFM t~A. 30 BE APPAOYID
1IHF.EtEAS9 the City Council of the City of Maheim did adopt ~ Genernl Plan by
Resnlution No...63R~869,•showing the general description and extent of land uses within
the City and indicating.the present belief of the Council as to possible future develop-
ment and redevalopment.of land withio the. City; and
1NHERfAS9 the City Planning Ccmmission of the City of Maheim did receive verif ied
e~etitior~s f.or Reclassif.ication Noe 6M65~13, and Yariance Noe 1693, which petitions have
itnplicatiortis .on policies as expressad on said General Plan$ and
NHEEFAS, in conjvnction with the notice of the hearing on said reclassification and
va~riance, notice was also gfven regarding the consideration of an amendment to the GenPral
Plan in the general location and vicinity of sub,~ect property of said reciasaification
and variaac~;. aad
NMEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold public hearings at the City Hall in
the City of Maheim on August 3ti August 31, and September 28, 1964 at 2s00 d'clock P,Id,o
notice of said..public hearings having been duly given as required by law and in acco~dance
with the provisions of the Anaheim l~unicipal Cpde, to hear and consider evidence for a~d
against said Amendme~t to the General Plan and said proposed Petition for Raclassificai;ion
and Variance to investigate and make findinqs and recommendations in connection therewlth,
and
MHFREAS, said Commission after due inspection9 investigation9 and study made by itself
and in its behalf and after due consideration of all evidence and :eports offered at said
hearing, ~pES HFRPgy p?ND
lo That evidence was presented at said hearing which justifies the City Planning
Co~mnis~ion°s recoireaending to the City Council a change in the present general
descr3ption and extent of land us~s in the area bounded by a tine 200 feet west
of Brookhtirst Street on ~he west, a line 650 feet south of Orange Avenue on the
south9 a line 200 feet east of Brookhurat Str~ret on the east, and Orange Avenue
on the northo
2e That Exhibit "'~" of Gene•ral Plan Amendment Noo 30 does constitute an acceptable
alternative to current policies as illustrated on the General Plap.
~
i ~
~ 3
l
~ .
,
•~
-'.3
-~~~
; . , ~,.~ <_)
NDY19 THEREl~RE. BE IT RESOLYm that the City Planning Commission of the City of i
M aheim.does. hereby recommend to the City Council of thE City of Maheim that subject ~
General Plan Ameodment be approved on the basis of the aforementioned findings and in ~
accordance with Exhibit "A".
THE PORBGOING RE9~LUIION is signe.i and approved by me this B y of October, 1964.
, ~ ~
, CHAI AHAHEIM CITY ANNING 001~9A4ISSION Z
ATTESTs '
~i~~~vYK/
SECRETARY ANAHEIk CITY PLANNING (AMMISSION
STATE OF CALIIaRNIA )
CaUj~'Y OF ORANGE ~) sse
CI7Y OF ANAHEIM )
I, Mn Krebs9 Secretary of the City Planning Cccmnission of the City of Anaheim d0 hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City
Pianning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on September 28, 1964, at 2~00 0'clock P.IAe,
by the following vote of tha memhers thersofe
AYES: OONMISSIONERSe Ailred, Chavos, Gauer, Mungall, Rowlanda
[~ESe G~MNIISSIONERSe Nonee
ABSENte (pMMISSIONERSa Camp, Perrya
IN~IYITNPSS 1NHERB~Fy I have hereunto set my hand this 8th day of October, 1964e
~~~~~
~Fa.RETARY ,",a.:+7SI~~ CI:Y °LS,"t!lIra 'i...^" ISGI~J
Resolution No. 1361