PC 1964-1965-1363
~.,.~~.~,,.n...~,..~,._~.,.....~_.. __ i
.,.,.._..~._._,~._._....
___. '
..~--- .._. - .- -
._.... - ____ __
~ ~*
~~ ~ ~~
RESOLUTION NOo 1363. Series 1 64-65
A.RES~)iUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING ODMMISSION OF THF CITY OF ANAHfiIM
~ RE[Ak6AENDING TO THE CITY OOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAfiQM THAT
GENERAL PLAN AMEImMENT_ NO< 40 BE DISAPPRO.VED
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maheim did adopt a General Pian by
Resolutioci Noe 63R•869, showing the general description and extent of land uses within
t~e City and indicating the.present belief of the Council as to possible future develop-
ment and..redevelopment of land within the City; and •
WHEEiEAS, .the City Planning_Commissian of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit Noe 627, which petition has implications on poZ;c?~s
as exprossed on said GeneraL plan; and
WHEREAS, in conjunction with ~Lfie notice of the hearing on said conditional use permit,
notice was also given regarding the coricideration nf an amendment to the General Plan in
the general locatina and vicini.ty of subject property of said conditionai use permit; and
~~, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in
}~e CSty of Maheim.on September 28, 1964, at 2e00 0'CLOCK P,Mo, notice of said public
}~ear3ng hauing.,been duly•g3,ven.as.required by law and in accordance with the provisinns
of the-1~naheim Municipal Code9 .to hear and consider evidence for and against said
Amendment to the General Plan and said proposed Petition for conditional use permit to
investigate and make.findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHERBAS9 said Commission after due inspection, investigation, and study made by
itself and in its.behalf and a£ter due consideration of all evidence and reports offered
at said hea,r.ingq DOES. HEREBY..FIt+m
1...That the..present general description and extent of land uses•
-~3n the,af.orementioned area adequately.represents past and current
City policies ,regarding possible future development of said general
axea, geaexally baunded by a line 200 feet west of Euclid Street on
~ the.west9 Cerri.tos.Avenue.on the south, a line 250 feet east of Euclid
Street on tha east, a line 550 feet south of Ball Road on.the north>
2< That no..evidence was presented at said hearing which would justify
the City Planning Commis3lon recommending a change in the above
•- mentioned policies to.the.City Councii.
3e That ~xhihit "A" add "B" of General.Plan Amendment No< 40 does not
constitute an acceptable alternative to current policies as illustrated
on the General Plan. .
~
_ , i
V
~~ V
NOINq THEREI~AE~ BE IT RESOLVEO that t} j City P.lanning Cotmnission o° the City
of Anaheim does hereby recommend to the City Council of the City of Maheim that subject
General P1an.AmendmAi~t be..disapproved on ;he basis of the aforementioned findings.
THE PORQ;OING RE90LUfI0N is signad and approved by me this 8th day of October, 1964.
CHAIR~AN ANAHEIM CITY P ING ~MMISSION
AITESTs
SECRHTARY CITY PLANNING OOMMISSION
STATE OF CALIf~RNIA )
aOUNTY OF ORAN(3E ~) ss e
CITY OF ANpHE~d )
I9 Ann~Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby
certify that the foregoing.resolutfon was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City
Planniny Commission of the City.cf Maheim, held ot. September 28, 1964 at 2a00 0'clock
P,yo9.by the following vote of the members thereoft
AY~a ~MISSIONERSa Alired9 Chavosy Gauer9 Mungall, Rowland.
Maa ~ONW~ISSIONERSs Nonee
ABSED1Tt 00l~WlISSI~NERS: Camp, Perry,
IN WITNESS WHER~F9 I have hereunto set my hand this 8th day of October, 1964.
~
SECRETARY ANpHETM CITY PLANRING OOMMISSION
~,_''
,,
.: i
'~,~c»<~b..s.,"'~.~