PC 1964-1965-1366, ~,
RESOLUTION NOe 1366. Series 1964-65
A RfiSOLU?ION OF 1'HE. CITY PLANNING CDMIIISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEiId
RF.~LWIENDING TO THE CITY ODUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHIIWI THAT '
GFldF~tAI.- PLAN 1WE~IDMENf 1~. 19 BE DISAPPImVID
WHEtEAS, the City Council of the City of Maheim did adopt a Ge~eral Plan ~
by Resolution Noe 63R-869, Fhowing the general description and exteni of land ~
uses within the City and indicating the present belief of the Council as~to ;
possible future development and redevelc~rnent of land within the City; and ~
i
WHEREAS, the City Planning Cortanission of the City~ of Anaheim did receive ~
ver3fied Petitions for Reclassification No. 64-65-18, Conditional Use Permit
Noa 613, and Revis3on No. 3 of Tentative Mlap of Tract No. 5611., which petitions ?
a.,n iwp:1~3~:C~ .. ~ p a_: a
.-._ zs ^ c2,,,,es as axpressed on said General Plan; and ~
iN1iFREAS, in conjunction with the notice of the hearing on said reclassification, ~
conditional use permit, and tentative tract, notice was also given regarding the
considerat3on•of aa amendment to the General Plan in the general location and ~
vicinity of subject property of said reclassification, conditional uv,e permit ~
and tentative tract; and
1MHFREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City '•
Hall in the City of Anaheim on A~~yust 17, and September 28, 196a. at 7s00 0'clock
P.~le~ notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law
and in accordance with the provisions of the M aheim ldunicipal Code, to hear anc~ t
consider evidence for and against said Amendment to the General Plan and eaid i
pruposed Petitions for Reclassification, Conditional Use Permit, and Temative ;
Tract to investiqate and make findings and recortmendations in connection there-
with; and ~
~
MHEREAS, said.Conmiission after due inspection, investigation, and study ~
made by iteelf and in its behalf and after due consideration of all evidence
and.repcrts offered at said haaring, DOES HFA~Y.FIND ~
4
1. That the.present general description and extent of land uses
in the aforementioned area adequately represents past and ~
current City policies regarding possible future development i
of said general area, bounded on the north by South Street,
on the west by State Coilege Boulevard, on the south by Wagner ~
Avenue9 and on the east by the park and school district ad~a;:ent
to Sunkist Street. ~
2o That no evidence was presented at saict hearin9 which would ~
justify the City Planning Commission recommending a change ~
in the above mentioned policies to the City Council, ~
I
3. 'that Exhibit "A" of General Plan Amendment No. 19 does not ~
constitute an acceptable alternative to current policies as
illustrated on the General Plan. .
. '
~ ___.___.----.~_._.___.___._.__.------- '.~-
,~-,.,...,~~,~.~.____ ___------- -_.__
~ ^ 1~'~ ~
NOW, THEREPORE BE IT RESOLVID that the City Planning Commission of thP City
of .Anaheim does hereby recommend to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that
subject Ger~eral Plan Amendment be disapproved on the basis of the aforementioned
fi~dings.
THE EnRB(~ING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 8th day of October,
1964. ~~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLAI~ING aDMMISSION
~~
AI'f EST e
/~'•~`~ic:~/
S~:RII'ARY ANAHQM CITY PLANNING OOMMISSIQN
STATE OF CALIf'ORNIA )
[AUNTY ~.1F ORANGE ) sse
CITY OF ANAHEIId )
I9 Mn Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Co~amission of the City of Anaheim do
hereby certify that the fcregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting
of the C;ty Pianning Commissjon of the City of M°heim, held on September 28, 1964,
at 7sCC~ 0`c'lock Poldo9 by the following vote of the members thereof~
AYESs ODM~.~ISSIONERSs A;lredy Chavos, Gauer, Mungall, Rowlande
NO&Ss 001~MISSI~NERSe Noneo
ABSENft ~IrWISSIONFRSs Camp, Perry.
IN Y(ITNESS WHER~F9 I have hereunto set my hand this 8th day of October, 1964.
SECRETARX ANAHEIM CITY PLAM~IINO OOIAM[ISSION
Resolution No. 1366