PC 1964-1965-1373;, .
(~)
RESOLUTION NO. 1373, SERIES 1964-65
kRESOLUTION OF THE C1TY PLANNING CO1NMlSSION OF THE C1TY OF ANAHEIhI
` . RBCOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TfiAT
PETTfION FOR RECLASSIFICATIQN N0. 64-65-40 BE DENffiD
WHEREAS, the City Planaing Commissioa of the City of Maheim did receive e vecified Petition fot Reclassi6ca-
tionfmm RICHARD M. POLENTZ, 423 Park Way~ Anaheim, California~ Owner; HAROLD L. WFIRICH,
420 South Euclid Avenue, Anaheim, California, Agent of certain real property situated in the
City of Anaheim, ~ounty of Orange~ S~ate of California, described as the north 65.35 feet of
Lot Noo 1 of Tract Noe 1071
; end
WHEREAS, the City Planniag Commisafon did hold e public heariag at the City Hall ia the City oE Anaheim oa
OCtOber 19~ 1964~ at 2:00 o'ciocic P.bi., notice of seid pnbIic 8earing hevieg been duly givm as cequired
by lea and in accordance with the provisions of tha Aaaheim Mmicipel Code, Chepter 18.72,to hear end coneider evi-
deace for and egeinat aeid proposed reclassification and to iavestigate aad make findings ead recommeadatioas la
comection therewith: and
IqHEREAS, said Commisalon, eRer due iaspection, inveatigatioa, ead study mede by itselE end in ite behalf,
and ahar due coasideration of all evidence aa8 repods offaed at said heacing, does flad aad dete~ine the following
facts:
1. Thet the petitloner propoaee e recluaificaUon of the ebove described propetty from the R-0~ Residential
Suburban9 Zone to the R 1, One Family Residential, Zone to create one R-1 lot less than 7200
square feet, and retain the balance for an R-0 loto
2. That.the proposed reclassification of subject property is not necessary and/or
desirable £ar t,he orderly and prQper development of the community.
3e That the..proposed division of sub~ect property, after the required dedication for
straet widening was made9 would create a substandard R-0, R-1 lots.
4. Zhat the proposed reclass.ification of subject property would set a prece~ent for
the division of all R-O.Zoned lots.in the.immediate vicinity of subject property.
5. That the proposed establishment of a R-1 Zoneci lot would be incompatible to the
exieting develc~ment of residential suburban lots which have a minimum of 10,000 square feet.
6e That two persons appeared representing 5 persons in the Council Chamber and two
letters were received in opposition to sub~ect petition.
Ri-D ~ -1- '
.. ~
.
!
~
l~
NOW, TFIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Maheim City Planaiug Commission does hereby iecommend
to the City C9undi oE thc Ciry, of Aneheim thet aubject Petition for ReclaeaiScetioa be denied oa the beais of the
aforementioaed Badings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end epproved by me this 29th day of October, 1964e
. J
. CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY P ING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~~.~ i~/!'~/
~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLRNNING COMh1ISSI0N
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEAN ) ~
I~ Ann: Kr~etb~"y Secretery of the City Pleanlag Commissioa of the City of Aaaheim, do hereby certify that the fo:e-
goiag reaolutlon aas paesed end edopted et e meeting of tt-e City Planaing Commiseion of the City of Anaheim, held oa
October 19~ 1964~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the followiug vote of the memben thereof:
AYES: COhU1dISSIONERS: Camp, Chavos' Gauer, 1Q~mga119 Perry, Rowland.
NOES: COI~YIISSIONERS: licne.
ABSENT: COb~SSIONERS: Allrede
IN WTfNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto aet my haad this 29th day of October~ 1964.
;
r ~
~ ^I
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIIIG CO1I~ILSSION
RESOLUTION NO. 1373
R2-D _Z-:
i
1
~